Development and Psychometric Validation of a Scale for Measurement of Tramadol Abuse

Orfega Zwawua, Rohani Ismail, Mohd Yasin Mohd Azhar, N. M. Noor, Targema Iorvaa
{"title":"Development and Psychometric Validation of a Scale for Measurement of Tramadol Abuse","authors":"Orfega Zwawua, Rohani Ismail, Mohd Yasin Mohd Azhar, N. M. Noor, Targema Iorvaa","doi":"10.4314/ajdas.v20i2.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There are indications that the practices or behaviour involving tramadol use have not been measured with valid and reliable tools in the past. A scale that can be used to identify tramadol abuse practices in both clinical and non-clinical settings would be useful for possible intervention efforts. The objective of this study was, therefore, to develop and validate a scale to measure tramadol abuse. The scale items were sourced from the literature and outcomes from focus group discussions (FGDs) with 16 longterm tramadol users who were screened with Q-cup urine drug test kit (Q-CUDTK). Six experts and 30 long-term tramadol users were engaged for content and face validations of the items respectively. For construct validation, 180 tramadol users participated. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was applied to identify the underlying factor structure of the scale and Cronbach’s alpha was computed for the scale internal consistency. Two items failed to meet the I-CVI (item-content validity index) cut-off point (I-CVIs < 0.83) and were deleted leaving 18 items with the S-CVI (scale-validity index) of 0.93. Three more items were deleted for having factor loadings below 0.50 leaving 15 items. The EFA resulted in the extraction of three factors: frequency of use (7 items), intensity of use (5 items) and pattern of use (3 items) with the reliability coefficients of 0.95, 0.96 and 0.89 respectively. We named this scale ‘Tram-BEHAV’ because it can be used to identify tramadol abuse behaviour for possible intervention. It can also be used for the evaluation of tramadol abuse intervention programmes. ","PeriodicalId":39196,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of Drug and Alcohol Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Journal of Drug and Alcohol Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/ajdas.v20i2.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There are indications that the practices or behaviour involving tramadol use have not been measured with valid and reliable tools in the past. A scale that can be used to identify tramadol abuse practices in both clinical and non-clinical settings would be useful for possible intervention efforts. The objective of this study was, therefore, to develop and validate a scale to measure tramadol abuse. The scale items were sourced from the literature and outcomes from focus group discussions (FGDs) with 16 longterm tramadol users who were screened with Q-cup urine drug test kit (Q-CUDTK). Six experts and 30 long-term tramadol users were engaged for content and face validations of the items respectively. For construct validation, 180 tramadol users participated. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was applied to identify the underlying factor structure of the scale and Cronbach’s alpha was computed for the scale internal consistency. Two items failed to meet the I-CVI (item-content validity index) cut-off point (I-CVIs < 0.83) and were deleted leaving 18 items with the S-CVI (scale-validity index) of 0.93. Three more items were deleted for having factor loadings below 0.50 leaving 15 items. The EFA resulted in the extraction of three factors: frequency of use (7 items), intensity of use (5 items) and pattern of use (3 items) with the reliability coefficients of 0.95, 0.96 and 0.89 respectively. We named this scale ‘Tram-BEHAV’ because it can be used to identify tramadol abuse behaviour for possible intervention. It can also be used for the evaluation of tramadol abuse intervention programmes. 
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
曲马多滥用量表的编制与心理计量学验证
有迹象表明,涉及曲马多使用的做法或行为过去没有使用有效和可靠的工具进行测量。可用于确定临床和非临床环境中曲马多滥用行为的量表将有助于可能的干预工作。因此,本研究的目的是开发和验证一个测量曲马多滥用的量表。量表项目来源于文献和16名长期曲马多使用者的焦点小组讨论(fgd)结果,这些使用者使用q杯尿液药物测试试剂盒(Q-CUDTK)进行筛选。分别聘请6名专家和30名曲马多长期使用者进行内容验证和外观验证。为进行结构验证,180名曲马多使用者参与。采用探索性因子分析(EFA)确定量表的潜在因子结构,并计算Cronbach 's alpha来确定量表的内部一致性。2个项目未能达到I-CVI(项目内容效度指数)的分界点(I-CVI < 0.83),被删除,留下18个项目的S-CVI(量表效度指数)为0.93。因子负荷低于0.50的另外三个项目被删除,剩下15个项目。EFA提取出使用频率(7项)、使用强度(5项)和使用方式(3项)3个因子,信度系数分别为0.95、0.96和0.89。我们将这个量表命名为“曲马多行为”,因为它可以用来识别曲马多滥用行为,以便进行可能的干预。它也可用于评价曲马多滥用干预方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
African Journal of Drug and Alcohol Studies
African Journal of Drug and Alcohol Studies Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
期刊最新文献
Implementation of the “unplugged” school-based prevention programme in Nigeria: Results of process evaluation Methamphetamine (Mkpuru-Mmiri) prevalence in Southeastern Nigeria: Exploring peoples' perception of public flogging as a control measure The impact of substance use disorders on families and carers: A scoping review Mental health problems, dark triad personality and school environment performance in substance user and non-user of high school students Substance use under a restrictive and prohibitive policy regime in secondary schools in Uganda: The convergence of motives, contexts and student characteristics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1