Effects of low-intensity and short-duration isometric contraction after static stretching on range of motion, passive stiffness, and isometric muscle force

Shin Goto, Shingo Matsuo, M. Iwata, Wakako Tsuchida, Genki Hatano, S. Kataura, Yasuhiro Banno, Y. Asai, Shigeyuki Suzuki
{"title":"Effects of low-intensity and short-duration isometric contraction after static stretching on range of motion, passive stiffness, and isometric muscle force","authors":"Shin Goto, Shingo Matsuo, M. Iwata, Wakako Tsuchida, Genki Hatano, S. Kataura, Yasuhiro Banno, Y. Asai, Shigeyuki Suzuki","doi":"10.7600/jpfsm.9.247","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although static stretching is commonly performed to improve flexibility, it has been reported to have detrimental effects on muscle force and performance. Previous studies have reported that low-intensity and short-duration isometric contraction after static stretching inhibits stretch-induced force loss. However, the detailed effects of low-intensity short-duration isometric contraction after static stretching on flexibility, such as passive torque and stiffness, are currently unclear. Therefore, the current study sought to reveal the effects of low-intensity and short-duration isometric contraction after static stretching on flexibility and muscle force. Sixteen healthy participants (eight men, eight women) performed 300-s static stretching (SS), 300-s static stretching followed by 6-s 30% maximum isometric voluntary contraction (MIVC) (SS-30% MIVC), and 6-s 30% MIVC (30% MIVC) of the right hamstring on three separate days, in random order. Range of motion (ROM) and passive stiffness during knee extension, peak passive torque, and MIVC torque were obtained before and after exercise. ROM and peak passive torque were significantly increased after all exercises, whereas passive stiffness and MIVC torque were significantly decreased after SS only. Moreover, ROM after SS and SS-30% MIVC were significantly greater than that of 30% MIVC, and peak passive torque after SS-30% MIVC was significantly greater than that of SS, while passive stiffness after SS was significantly lower than that of 30% MIVC. These results indicate that low-intensity and short-duration isometric contraction after static stretching is effective for inhibiting stretch-induced force loss while also inhibiting the effects of static stretching on passive","PeriodicalId":55847,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Physical Fitness and Sports Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Physical Fitness and Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7600/jpfsm.9.247","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Although static stretching is commonly performed to improve flexibility, it has been reported to have detrimental effects on muscle force and performance. Previous studies have reported that low-intensity and short-duration isometric contraction after static stretching inhibits stretch-induced force loss. However, the detailed effects of low-intensity short-duration isometric contraction after static stretching on flexibility, such as passive torque and stiffness, are currently unclear. Therefore, the current study sought to reveal the effects of low-intensity and short-duration isometric contraction after static stretching on flexibility and muscle force. Sixteen healthy participants (eight men, eight women) performed 300-s static stretching (SS), 300-s static stretching followed by 6-s 30% maximum isometric voluntary contraction (MIVC) (SS-30% MIVC), and 6-s 30% MIVC (30% MIVC) of the right hamstring on three separate days, in random order. Range of motion (ROM) and passive stiffness during knee extension, peak passive torque, and MIVC torque were obtained before and after exercise. ROM and peak passive torque were significantly increased after all exercises, whereas passive stiffness and MIVC torque were significantly decreased after SS only. Moreover, ROM after SS and SS-30% MIVC were significantly greater than that of 30% MIVC, and peak passive torque after SS-30% MIVC was significantly greater than that of SS, while passive stiffness after SS was significantly lower than that of 30% MIVC. These results indicate that low-intensity and short-duration isometric contraction after static stretching is effective for inhibiting stretch-induced force loss while also inhibiting the effects of static stretching on passive
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
静态拉伸后的低强度和短时间等距收缩对运动范围、被动僵硬和等距肌肉力的影响
虽然静态拉伸通常是为了提高柔韧性而进行的,但据报道,它对肌肉的力量和表现有不利影响。先前的研究报道了静态拉伸后低强度和短时间的等距收缩抑制拉伸引起的力损失。然而,静态拉伸后的低强度短时间等距收缩对柔韧性的详细影响,如被动扭矩和刚度,目前尚不清楚。因此,本研究旨在揭示静态拉伸后低强度、短时间等距收缩对柔韧性和肌肉力量的影响。16名健康参与者(8名男性,8名女性)在3天随机进行300秒静态拉伸(SS), 300秒静态拉伸后6-s 30%最大等距自主收缩(MIVC) (SS-30% MIVC)和6-s 30% MIVC (30% MIVC)右腿筋。在运动前后分别获得膝关节伸展时的运动范围(ROM)和被动刚度,峰值被动扭矩和MIVC扭矩。所有运动后ROM和峰值被动扭矩显著增加,而被动刚度和MIVC扭矩仅在SS后显著降低。此外,SS和SS-30% MIVC后的ROM显著大于30% MIVC, SS-30% MIVC后的峰值被动扭矩显著大于SS,而SS后的被动刚度显著低于30% MIVC。这些结果表明,静态拉伸后的低强度和短时间等距收缩可以有效地抑制拉伸引起的力损失,同时也可以抑制静态拉伸对被动拉伸的影响
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊最新文献
Effects of stimulation conditions and subcutaneous tissue properties on acupressure-induced changes in blood circulation of human tendons Investigation of effective standing posture for increasing activity of pelvic floor muscles: a cross-sectional study Short-term strength adaptation in isometric training to volitional failure depends on initial specific tension in elbow flexors <sup>13</sup>C-glucose breath test quantifies differences in glucose metabolism between endurance and non-athletes Nutrition-related considerations for health and performance in female basketball players: a narrative review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1