The cultural influence on employees' preferences for reward allocation rules: A two-wave survey study in 28 countries

IF 5.4 2区 管理学 Q1 INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR Human Resource Management Journal Pub Date : 2023-01-08 DOI:10.1111/1748-8583.12486
Mladen Adamovic
{"title":"The cultural influence on employees' preferences for reward allocation rules: A two-wave survey study in 28 countries","authors":"Mladen Adamovic","doi":"10.1111/1748-8583.12486","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Multinational organisations and government organisations experienced problems introducing a merit pay system in different countries. Designing the right reward system is challenging in an international work environment, because employees often have different expectations about reward allocations. Most prior research predicted that individualistic employees prefer equity as allocation rule for rewards, while collectivistic employees prefer equality as allocation rule. However, prior research could not confirm this prediction. To expand prior research, we integrate cultural value theory and allocation rule research to examine if employees' culture-inspired personal values influence their preferred allocation rule. We conducted a two-wave study with 3432 employees from 28 countries. The results show that employees' cultural value orientations are related to their preferred allocation rules. Further, supervisors are not only considered fair if they distribute outcomes based on employees' task performance but also based on equality or extra-role performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":47916,"journal":{"name":"Human Resource Management Journal","volume":"33 4","pages":"889-921"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Resource Management Journal","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1748-8583.12486","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Multinational organisations and government organisations experienced problems introducing a merit pay system in different countries. Designing the right reward system is challenging in an international work environment, because employees often have different expectations about reward allocations. Most prior research predicted that individualistic employees prefer equity as allocation rule for rewards, while collectivistic employees prefer equality as allocation rule. However, prior research could not confirm this prediction. To expand prior research, we integrate cultural value theory and allocation rule research to examine if employees' culture-inspired personal values influence their preferred allocation rule. We conducted a two-wave study with 3432 employees from 28 countries. The results show that employees' cultural value orientations are related to their preferred allocation rules. Further, supervisors are not only considered fair if they distribute outcomes based on employees' task performance but also based on equality or extra-role performance.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
文化对员工奖励分配规则偏好的影响:一项在28个国家的两波调查研究
跨国组织和政府机构在不同国家推行绩效薪酬制度时遇到了问题。在国际工作环境中,设计正确的奖励制度是具有挑战性的,因为员工通常对奖励分配有不同的期望。以往的研究大多预测,个人主义员工更倾向于公平作为奖励的分配规则,而集体主义员工更倾向于平等作为奖励的分配规则。然而,之前的研究并不能证实这一预测。为了拓展已有的研究,我们将文化价值理论与分配规则研究相结合,考察员工受文化启发的个人价值观是否影响其偏好的分配规则。我们对来自28个国家的3432名员工进行了两波研究。结果表明,员工的文化价值取向与其偏好的分配规则有关。此外,如果主管不仅根据员工的任务表现分配结果,而且根据平等或角色外表现分配结果,则被认为是公平的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
10.90%
发文量
56
期刊介绍: Human Resource Management Journal (CABS/AJG 4*) is a globally orientated HRM journal that promotes the understanding of human resource management to academics and practicing managers. We provide an international forum for discussion and debate, and stress the critical importance of people management to wider economic, political and social concerns. Endorsed by the Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development, HRMJ is essential reading for everyone involved in personnel management, training, industrial relations, employment and human resource management.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Neuronormativity as ignorant design in human resource management: The case of an unsupportive national context Reflections on achieving anti‐racism in organisations: The role of human resource management scholars and practitioners Gender composition at work and women's career satisfaction: An international study of 35 societies Antecedents and outcomes of enabling HR practices: The paradox of consistency and flexibility
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1