Knowledge about and attitude toward electroconvulsive therapy among those who agree and those who refuse electroconvulsive therapy treatment

S. Grover, N. Varadharajan, S. Chakrabarti
{"title":"Knowledge about and attitude toward electroconvulsive therapy among those who agree and those who refuse electroconvulsive therapy treatment","authors":"S. Grover, N. Varadharajan, S. Chakrabarti","doi":"10.4103/jmhhb.jmhhb_218_20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is although one of the most effective treatments in psychiatry, and many a times patients refuse the same. Although, there is information about the knowledge about and attitude towards ECT among people who receive the same, little is known about these among those who refuse ECT. Aim: This study attempted to assess and compare the knowledge about and attitude toward ECT in patients with severe mental illness who accepted and refused ECT. Methodology: 68 patients divided into 3 groups (readily accepted; accepted, with initial reluctance; refused) based on the readiness for ECT were evaluated using ECT knowledge and attitude questionnaire. The higher proportion of those who refused had poor knowledge about the frequency of ECT sessions, investigations required before ECT and believed that ECT can be given against patient and family members' consent. Higher proportion of those who initially refused but later agreed believed that ECT can be given without the patient or family members'consent and it is given only to those patients who are unlikely to improve when compared to those who agreed ECT. Compared to those who agreed spontaneously, higher proportion of the participants in other two groups believed that ECT is not useful in the treatment of psychiatric disorders and they lacked knowledge about headache being a side effect of ECT. In terms of attitude toward ECT, higher proportion of those who refused ECT (n = 24; 89%) had a negative attitude in terms of not recommending the same for their relatives and were reluctant to receive ECT themselves. Conclusions: The results highlight that negative perception toward ECT in patients who refuse to receive ECT. Thus, it is essential to convey adequate information about ECT to enhance their understanding and acceptance.","PeriodicalId":31679,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mental Health and Human Behaviour","volume":"26 1","pages":"92 - 99"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mental Health and Human Behaviour","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jmhhb.jmhhb_218_20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is although one of the most effective treatments in psychiatry, and many a times patients refuse the same. Although, there is information about the knowledge about and attitude towards ECT among people who receive the same, little is known about these among those who refuse ECT. Aim: This study attempted to assess and compare the knowledge about and attitude toward ECT in patients with severe mental illness who accepted and refused ECT. Methodology: 68 patients divided into 3 groups (readily accepted; accepted, with initial reluctance; refused) based on the readiness for ECT were evaluated using ECT knowledge and attitude questionnaire. The higher proportion of those who refused had poor knowledge about the frequency of ECT sessions, investigations required before ECT and believed that ECT can be given against patient and family members' consent. Higher proportion of those who initially refused but later agreed believed that ECT can be given without the patient or family members'consent and it is given only to those patients who are unlikely to improve when compared to those who agreed ECT. Compared to those who agreed spontaneously, higher proportion of the participants in other two groups believed that ECT is not useful in the treatment of psychiatric disorders and they lacked knowledge about headache being a side effect of ECT. In terms of attitude toward ECT, higher proportion of those who refused ECT (n = 24; 89%) had a negative attitude in terms of not recommending the same for their relatives and were reluctant to receive ECT themselves. Conclusions: The results highlight that negative perception toward ECT in patients who refuse to receive ECT. Thus, it is essential to convey adequate information about ECT to enhance their understanding and acceptance.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
同意和拒绝电休克治疗者对电休克治疗的认识和态度
背景:电休克治疗(ECT)虽然是精神病学中最有效的治疗方法之一,但许多患者拒绝接受。尽管在接受ECT治疗的人中有关于ECT知识和态度的信息,但在拒绝ECT治疗的人群中却知之甚少。目的:本研究试图评估和比较接受和拒绝ECT的严重精神疾病患者对ECT的知识和态度。方法:根据ECT的准备情况,将68名患者分为3组(容易接受;接受,最初不情愿;拒绝),使用ECT知识和态度问卷进行评估。拒绝接受ECT治疗的人中,有更高比例的人对ECT治疗的频率、ECT治疗前需要进行的调查知之甚少,并认为可以在未经患者和家人同意的情况下进行ECT治疗。最初拒绝但后来同意的患者中,有更高比例的人认为ECT可以在没有患者或家属同意的情况下进行,而且与同意ECT的患者相比,ECT只给那些不太可能改善的患者。与那些自发同意的人相比,其他两组中有更高比例的参与者认为ECT对治疗精神疾病无效,并且他们对头痛是ECT的副作用缺乏了解。在对ECT的态度方面,拒绝ECT的人中有更高比例(n=24;89%)对不向亲属推荐ECT持负面态度,并且不愿意自己接受ECT。结论:研究结果强调了拒绝接受ECT治疗的患者对ECT的负面看法。因此,传达足够的ECT信息以提高他们的理解和接受度是至关重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
31 weeks
期刊最新文献
Correlation between excessive smartphone usage, basic psychological needs, and mental health of university students Attitude and knowledge of physiotherapy students toward mental health and patients with psychiatric illnesses Coping and Cyberchondria in a Pandemic: A Study on Young Adults Psychiatric morbidity and its impact on quality of life in patients of chronic kidney disease undergoing hemodialysis Psychosocial intervention for harm reduction of alcohol use among school-going adolescents from North India
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1