Dislocation, Exploration, Invigoration: Exploring the Cross-cultural Intersection of Art and Friendship

Juanita Mulholland, Sarah Bacaller
{"title":"Dislocation, Exploration, Invigoration: Exploring the Cross-cultural Intersection of Art and Friendship","authors":"Juanita Mulholland, Sarah Bacaller","doi":"10.1080/07256868.2023.2192469","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT If love can blind, are there are also scenarios in which relationality invokes clarity of knowledge and closeness of hearing? In this collaborative piece, Bardi artist and weaver Juanita Mulholland and researcher Sarah Bacaller explore the intersection between friendship and Australian Indigenous art forms. They reflect on the development and ethos of Juanita’s artistic practice, as it pertains to her sense of Indigenous identity and selfhood, including in the context of dislocation and loss. The dialogue is prefaced by reflections on recent criticism by Fisher [2012. The Art/Ethnography Binary: Post-Colonial Tensions Within the Field of Australian Aboriginal Art. Cultural Sociology, 6 (2), 251–270] on the ethnography–art binary in approaches to interpreting Australian Indigenous art in its diverse and varied forms. By exploring the dangers inherent in both objectivist (‘ethographic’) and subjectivist (art ‘on its own terms’) approaches, and building on the work of Biddle and Stefanoff [2015. What is Same but Different and why Does it Matter? Cultural Studies Review, 21 (1), 97–120], the authors explore how ethical relationality and connection can lead to a fuller understanding and appreciation of artworks and their artists, especially in relation to non-Indigenous engagement with Australian Indigenous artistry.","PeriodicalId":46961,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intercultural Studies","volume":"44 1","pages":"772 - 784"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intercultural Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07256868.2023.2192469","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT If love can blind, are there are also scenarios in which relationality invokes clarity of knowledge and closeness of hearing? In this collaborative piece, Bardi artist and weaver Juanita Mulholland and researcher Sarah Bacaller explore the intersection between friendship and Australian Indigenous art forms. They reflect on the development and ethos of Juanita’s artistic practice, as it pertains to her sense of Indigenous identity and selfhood, including in the context of dislocation and loss. The dialogue is prefaced by reflections on recent criticism by Fisher [2012. The Art/Ethnography Binary: Post-Colonial Tensions Within the Field of Australian Aboriginal Art. Cultural Sociology, 6 (2), 251–270] on the ethnography–art binary in approaches to interpreting Australian Indigenous art in its diverse and varied forms. By exploring the dangers inherent in both objectivist (‘ethographic’) and subjectivist (art ‘on its own terms’) approaches, and building on the work of Biddle and Stefanoff [2015. What is Same but Different and why Does it Matter? Cultural Studies Review, 21 (1), 97–120], the authors explore how ethical relationality and connection can lead to a fuller understanding and appreciation of artworks and their artists, especially in relation to non-Indigenous engagement with Australian Indigenous artistry.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
错位、探索、振兴:探索艺术与友谊的跨文化交汇点
如果爱情可以使人盲目,那么是否也存在这样的场景:关系唤起了知识的清晰和听觉的紧密?在这个合作作品中,巴蒂艺术家和编织者胡安妮塔·穆赫兰和研究员萨拉·巴卡勒探索了友谊和澳大利亚土著艺术形式之间的交集。它们反映了胡安妮塔艺术实践的发展和精神,因为它与她的土著身份和自我意识有关,包括在错位和失落的背景下。对话的开头是对Fisher[2012]最近批评的反思。艺术/民族志二元:澳大利亚土著艺术领域内的后殖民紧张关系。《文化社会学》,6(2),251-270]关于民族志-艺术二元论在解释澳大利亚土著艺术的多样化和多样化形式的方法。通过探索客观主义(“民族志”)和主观主义(“按照自己的条件”的艺术)方法中固有的危险,并以Biddle和Stefanoff[2015]的工作为基础。什么是同而不同,为什么重要?《文化研究评论》,21(1),97-120],作者探讨了伦理关系和联系如何导致对艺术品及其艺术家的更全面的理解和欣赏,特别是与非土著参与澳大利亚土著艺术的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
10.00%
发文量
67
期刊介绍: Journal of Intercultural Studies showcases innovative scholarship about emerging cultural formations, intercultural negotiations and contemporary challenges to cultures and identities. It welcomes theoretically informed articles from diverse disciplines that contribute to the following discussions: -Reconceptualising notions of nationhood, citizenship and belonging; -Questioning theories of diaspora, transnationalism, hybridity and ‘border crossing’, and their contextualised applications; -Exploring the contemporary sociocultural formations of whiteness, ethnicity, racialization, postcolonialism and indigeneity -Examining how past and contemporary key scholars can inform current thinking on intercultural knowledge, multiculturalism, race and cultural identity. Journal of Intercultural Studies is an international, interdisciplinary journal that particularly encourages contributions from scholars in cultural studies, sociology, migration studies, literary studies, gender studies, anthropology, cultural geography, urban studies, race and ethnic studies.
期刊最新文献
Normalistas-Teachers and Coloniality of Power in Mexico ‘I Was Part of Minority Group’: Youth’s Attitude Towards Multiculturalism and Their Awareness of Being an Intercultural Citizen Integration of Afghan Immigrants in Iran: A Multi-Grounded Theory Study Queer Encounters as Poetic Disruptions of the Nation in Ozan Zakariya Keskinkılıç’s Prinzenbad (2022) Encountering the Strange Feminine: Failure of Partition and Masculine Hegemony in Saadat Hasan Manto’s ‘Colder Than Ice’ (‘Thanda Gosht’)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1