The Nuclear Deterrence Strategy of the US-Japan Alliance is Failing but Can Be Fixed

IF 0.5 Q4 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Journal for Peace and Nuclear Disarmament Pub Date : 2021-07-03 DOI:10.1080/25751654.2021.1994744
Gregory Kulacki
{"title":"The Nuclear Deterrence Strategy of the US-Japan Alliance is Failing but Can Be Fixed","authors":"Gregory Kulacki","doi":"10.1080/25751654.2021.1994744","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The current nuclear deterrence strategy of the US-Japan alliance, which is based on the threat to use nuclear weapons first in a conflict with China, is not credible and is counterproductive. A new strategy, based on diplomacy rather than threats, is needed. Unfortunately, time is no longer on the side of the alliance. China has been waiting for the United States to advance two critical international nuclear arms control agreements for twenty-five years. Chinese diplomats say they are still willing to ratify the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty and negotiate a Fissile Material Cut-off Treaty. But the Chinese military seems to be pursuing an expansion of Chinese nuclear forces that will be difficult stop if it gets much farther along. Since a likely motivation for this expansion is to convince the US-Japan alliance that its current deterrence strategy can never succeed, reviving nuclear arms control diplomacy is the only viable means to reduce the risk of Chinese nuclear attacks against Japan.","PeriodicalId":32607,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Peace and Nuclear Disarmament","volume":"4 1","pages":"222 - 234"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Peace and Nuclear Disarmament","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/25751654.2021.1994744","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT The current nuclear deterrence strategy of the US-Japan alliance, which is based on the threat to use nuclear weapons first in a conflict with China, is not credible and is counterproductive. A new strategy, based on diplomacy rather than threats, is needed. Unfortunately, time is no longer on the side of the alliance. China has been waiting for the United States to advance two critical international nuclear arms control agreements for twenty-five years. Chinese diplomats say they are still willing to ratify the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty and negotiate a Fissile Material Cut-off Treaty. But the Chinese military seems to be pursuing an expansion of Chinese nuclear forces that will be difficult stop if it gets much farther along. Since a likely motivation for this expansion is to convince the US-Japan alliance that its current deterrence strategy can never succeed, reviving nuclear arms control diplomacy is the only viable means to reduce the risk of Chinese nuclear attacks against Japan.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美日同盟的核威慑战略正在失败,但可以修复
美日同盟目前的核威慑战略是建立在与中国发生冲突时威胁首先使用核武器的基础上的,这是不可信的,而且适得其反。我们需要一种基于外交而非威胁的新战略。不幸的是,时间不再站在联盟一边。25年来,中国一直在等待美国推进两项重要的国际核军备控制协议。中国外交官表示,他们仍然愿意批准《全面禁止核试验条约》,并就《禁止生产裂变材料条约》进行谈判。但中国军方似乎正在寻求扩大中国的核力量,如果它走得更远,将很难阻止。由于这种扩张的动机可能是让美日同盟相信,其当前的威慑战略永远不会成功,因此恢复核军备控制外交是降低中国对日本发动核攻击风险的唯一可行手段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Synergistic Effects of Deterrence by Denial and Safeguards in the Biological Weapons Convention: Building on the History of International Nuclear Safeguards The Limits of Anti-Nuclear Critique in Pakistan Contested Nuclear Sharing in Belgium: Domestic Political Dynamic for the Nuclear Weapons Ban Logic (or Illogic?) of Japan’s Aversion to TPNW and Charting a Path Forward Nuclear-Conventional Entanglement in Northeast Asia: The Case for Crisis Management Interoperability
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1