Early European Colonial Rule on the African Red Sea Littoral

Q3 Arts and Humanities Northeast African Studies Pub Date : 2017-10-24 DOI:10.14321/NORTAFRISTUD.17.1.0001
S. Serels
{"title":"Early European Colonial Rule on the African Red Sea Littoral","authors":"S. Serels","doi":"10.14321/NORTAFRISTUD.17.1.0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article proposes a new periodization of European colonial rule on the African Red Sea Littoral (ARSL). The ARSL is the arid and semi-arid region between the Red Sea and the Sudanese Nile and the Ethiopian/Eritrean highlands. The region is now divided among Sudan, Eritrea, and Djibouti. However, historically the ARSL was claimed by numerous pastoralist tribes and clans, including the Hadendowa, Bisharin, Amarar, Beni Amer, Habab, and Afar. This article demonstrates that the process of rendering these pastoralists into British, French, or Italian colonial subjects—i.e., of establishing European colonial rule—took decades. Though colonial officials laid their claims to the region at the end of the nineteenth century, it was not until the 1920s and 1930s that they began to exert meaningful forms of colonial control over these pastoralist communities. This article argues that this period of early colonial rule should be treated differently from the period of high colonial rule that follows. During the early period, the balance of power on the ground had not yet tipped in the favor of colonial officials. Though these officials were part of large imperial networks, they were not able to effectively mobilize these networks to get access to the resources they needed to establish effective administrations. At the same time, these officials did not command local resources, which, in general, remained in the hands of the local communities that continued to mobilize them to their advantage. These communities progressively lost access to the resources that allowed them to hold the colonial state at bay. In the case of the ARSL, this loss was only partially the result of actions taken by the emerging colonial state. Rather, the leading cause was the introduction of rinderpest, a disease that killed up to 90 percent of infected cattle in virgin herds. Following the initial epizootic impoverishment of the region, continuing poverty over time robbed pastoralists of their ability to protect themselves from adverse environmental conditions such as droughts. During the first third of the twentieth century, pastoralists were plagued by repeated famines that left them with no choice but to submit to the colonial state and gain access to the limited colonial food aid programs. This submission marks the end of early European colonial rule.","PeriodicalId":35635,"journal":{"name":"Northeast African Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Northeast African Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14321/NORTAFRISTUD.17.1.0001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article proposes a new periodization of European colonial rule on the African Red Sea Littoral (ARSL). The ARSL is the arid and semi-arid region between the Red Sea and the Sudanese Nile and the Ethiopian/Eritrean highlands. The region is now divided among Sudan, Eritrea, and Djibouti. However, historically the ARSL was claimed by numerous pastoralist tribes and clans, including the Hadendowa, Bisharin, Amarar, Beni Amer, Habab, and Afar. This article demonstrates that the process of rendering these pastoralists into British, French, or Italian colonial subjects—i.e., of establishing European colonial rule—took decades. Though colonial officials laid their claims to the region at the end of the nineteenth century, it was not until the 1920s and 1930s that they began to exert meaningful forms of colonial control over these pastoralist communities. This article argues that this period of early colonial rule should be treated differently from the period of high colonial rule that follows. During the early period, the balance of power on the ground had not yet tipped in the favor of colonial officials. Though these officials were part of large imperial networks, they were not able to effectively mobilize these networks to get access to the resources they needed to establish effective administrations. At the same time, these officials did not command local resources, which, in general, remained in the hands of the local communities that continued to mobilize them to their advantage. These communities progressively lost access to the resources that allowed them to hold the colonial state at bay. In the case of the ARSL, this loss was only partially the result of actions taken by the emerging colonial state. Rather, the leading cause was the introduction of rinderpest, a disease that killed up to 90 percent of infected cattle in virgin herds. Following the initial epizootic impoverishment of the region, continuing poverty over time robbed pastoralists of their ability to protect themselves from adverse environmental conditions such as droughts. During the first third of the twentieth century, pastoralists were plagued by repeated famines that left them with no choice but to submit to the colonial state and gain access to the limited colonial food aid programs. This submission marks the end of early European colonial rule.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
早期欧洲对非洲红海沿岸的殖民统治
本文提出了欧洲对非洲红海沿岸殖民统治的新时期。ARSL是红海、苏丹尼罗河和埃塞俄比亚/厄立特里亚高地之间的干旱和半干旱地区。该地区现在分为苏丹、厄立特里亚和吉布提。然而,从历史上看,许多牧民部落和氏族都声称拥有ARSL,包括Hadentuta、Bisharin、Amarar、Beni Amer、Habab和Afar。这篇文章表明,将这些牧民转变为英国、法国或意大利的殖民主体——即建立欧洲殖民统治——花了几十年的时间。尽管殖民地官员在19世纪末对该地区提出了主权要求,但直到20世纪20年代和30年代,他们才开始对这些牧民社区实施有意义的殖民控制。本文认为,这一早期殖民统治时期应与随后的高度殖民统治时期区别对待。在早期,当地的权力平衡还没有向殖民地官员倾斜。尽管这些官员是大型帝国网络的一部分,但他们无法有效地动员这些网络,以获得建立有效行政所需的资源。与此同时,这些官员没有掌握当地资源,这些资源总体上仍掌握在当地社区手中,这些社区继续动员他们为自己谋利。这些社区逐渐失去了控制殖民国家的资源。就ARSL而言,这一损失只是新兴殖民国家采取行动的部分结果。相反,主要原因是牛瘟的引入,这种疾病导致原始牛群中90%的受感染牛死亡。在该地区最初的流行病贫困之后,随着时间的推移,持续的贫困剥夺了牧民保护自己免受干旱等不利环境条件影响的能力。在20世纪前三分之一,牧民们饱受反复饥荒的困扰,这让他们别无选择,只能屈服于殖民国家,获得有限的殖民粮食援助计划。这份呈件标志着早期欧洲殖民统治的结束。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Northeast African Studies
Northeast African Studies Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Quest for Self-Determination and the State in Ethiopia: The Oromo Popular Uprising of 2014–2017 in Historical Perspective Race, Gender, and Pageantry: The Ups and Downs of an African American Woman in Imperial Ethiopia Dr. Abebe Ambatchew (1934–2022) National Integration through Political Marginalization: Contradictions of Nation-Building in Ethiopia The Past of Ethiopia's Present: Unfolding Crises, Cyclical Violence, and Competing Nationalism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1