“TAKING THE EMPATHY TO AN ACTIVIST STATE”: ALLY DEVELOPMENT AS CONTINUOUS CYCLES OF CRITICAL UNDERSTANDING AND ACTION

IF 1.4 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL Research in Human Development Pub Date : 2021-04-03 DOI:10.1080/15427609.2021.1928453
Karen L. Suyemoto, Alissa L Hochman
{"title":"“TAKING THE EMPATHY TO AN ACTIVIST STATE”: ALLY DEVELOPMENT AS CONTINUOUS CYCLES OF CRITICAL UNDERSTANDING AND ACTION","authors":"Karen L. Suyemoto, Alissa L Hochman","doi":"10.1080/15427609.2021.1928453","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Allies are individuals who take action to end oppression in areas in which they have privilege. Although research on ally development is growing, prior research has often conceptualized allies in a binary fashion (privileged or oppressed), focused on only one specific area of privilege (e.g., race, as in White privilege), been limited to one specific context of development (e.g., college), or examined influences rather than developmental processes. We used a constructivist grounded theory approach to address the question “What is the process of being and becoming an ally?” Through a constant comparative analysis approach, we analyzed 28 semi-structured depth interviews with community participants age 26 to 73 from diverse racial, social status, and sexual identities. Results indicated that developing as allies was a lifelong process, with iterative cycles of understandings and action. Understandings of privilege and oppression were developed through education and relational learning and included understandings of concepts and systems, personal positionality, and cognitive and emotional empathy. These understandings contributed a sense of capability and multiple motivations (responsibility and integrity, relational connectedness, and personal healing and growth) that moved participants into action. Taking action also involved an iterative cycle, including active processes of deciding whether and how to intervene; action engagement with people who are privileged as well as those who are oppressed; and evaluating action. This second cycle catalyzed processes of seeking further understandings. Findings from this study have implications for future research examining ally development across the lifespan and developing interventions to foster ally development to advance social justice.","PeriodicalId":47096,"journal":{"name":"Research in Human Development","volume":"18 1","pages":"105 - 148"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15427609.2021.1928453","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Human Development","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15427609.2021.1928453","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Allies are individuals who take action to end oppression in areas in which they have privilege. Although research on ally development is growing, prior research has often conceptualized allies in a binary fashion (privileged or oppressed), focused on only one specific area of privilege (e.g., race, as in White privilege), been limited to one specific context of development (e.g., college), or examined influences rather than developmental processes. We used a constructivist grounded theory approach to address the question “What is the process of being and becoming an ally?” Through a constant comparative analysis approach, we analyzed 28 semi-structured depth interviews with community participants age 26 to 73 from diverse racial, social status, and sexual identities. Results indicated that developing as allies was a lifelong process, with iterative cycles of understandings and action. Understandings of privilege and oppression were developed through education and relational learning and included understandings of concepts and systems, personal positionality, and cognitive and emotional empathy. These understandings contributed a sense of capability and multiple motivations (responsibility and integrity, relational connectedness, and personal healing and growth) that moved participants into action. Taking action also involved an iterative cycle, including active processes of deciding whether and how to intervene; action engagement with people who are privileged as well as those who are oppressed; and evaluating action. This second cycle catalyzed processes of seeking further understandings. Findings from this study have implications for future research examining ally development across the lifespan and developing interventions to foster ally development to advance social justice.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“把同理心带到一个积极的国家”:盟友的发展是批判性理解和行动的连续循环
盟友是指在他们享有特权的地区采取行动结束压迫的个人。尽管对盟友发展的研究越来越多,但先前的研究往往以二元方式(特权或受压迫)对盟友进行概念化,只关注特权的一个特定领域(例如,种族,如白人特权),局限于一个特定的发展背景(例如,大学),或考察影响而非发展过程。我们使用基于建构主义的理论方法来解决“成为盟友和成为盟友的过程是什么?”这个问题。通过持续的比较分析方法,我们分析了28次半结构化的深度访谈,对象是年龄在26岁至73岁之间的社区参与者,他们来自不同的种族、社会地位和性身份。结果表明,作为盟友的发展是一个终生的过程,有着反复的理解和行动循环。对特权和压迫的理解是通过教育和关系学习发展起来的,包括对概念和系统、个人立场以及认知和情感移情的理解。这些理解促成了一种能力感和多种动机(责任和正直、关系联系以及个人治愈和成长),促使参与者采取行动。采取行动还涉及一个反复循环,包括决定是否干预以及如何干预的积极过程;与享有特权的人和受压迫的人进行行动接触;以及评估行动。第二个循环促进了寻求进一步理解的过程。这项研究的发现对未来的研究具有启示意义,该研究考察了整个生命周期的盟友发展,并制定了促进盟友发展以促进社会正义的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Research in Human Development
Research in Human Development PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
5
期刊最新文献
Development and validation of the white critical consciousness index A Lifecourse Perspective on Singlehood Age 19-30 Union Formation Trajectories Across The Past 30 Years Within The U.S.: Delineating Heterogeneity In Trajectories And Its Historical And Sociodemographic Variation TIME-VARYING CORRELATES OF ADULT SINGLEHOOD: EDUCATION, WORK, LIVING ARRANGEMENTS, AND MENTAL HEALTH RELATIONSHIP AND SINGLEHOOD TRAJECTORIES DURING THE TRANSITION TO OLDER ADULTHOOD OVER THE PAST 40 YEARS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1