The Green Paradox, A Hotelling Cul de Sac

IF 1.8 4区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS Economics of Energy & Environmental Policy Pub Date : 2019-04-01 DOI:10.5547/2160-5890.8.2.rcai
Robert D. Cairns, James L. Smith
{"title":"The Green Paradox, A Hotelling Cul de Sac","authors":"Robert D. Cairns, James L. Smith","doi":"10.5547/2160-5890.8.2.rcai","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The green paradox is an effect by which an increasing tax per unit on oil production, aimed at tracking damages from CO2 emissions, induces an increase in world production and a decrease in price in the near term. The increase is a rational response in a Hotelling exhaustible-resource model. We simulate the decisions of a price-taking producer in response to a tax of various shapes. In contrast to a Hotelling model, our extraction technology involves irreversible, lumpy investments in exploration and development. In addition, we assume output from a developed reserve is subject to natural decline at a rate that is determined by the sunk development investment and the geology of the reserve. Decisions are far more complicated, and results far subtler, than in the Hotelling framework. Given a price path, we show that almost any form of tax causes a reduction in the level of development and initial production, thereby contradicting the hypothesis of the green paradox.","PeriodicalId":45808,"journal":{"name":"Economics of Energy & Environmental Policy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economics of Energy & Environmental Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5547/2160-5890.8.2.rcai","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

The green paradox is an effect by which an increasing tax per unit on oil production, aimed at tracking damages from CO2 emissions, induces an increase in world production and a decrease in price in the near term. The increase is a rational response in a Hotelling exhaustible-resource model. We simulate the decisions of a price-taking producer in response to a tax of various shapes. In contrast to a Hotelling model, our extraction technology involves irreversible, lumpy investments in exploration and development. In addition, we assume output from a developed reserve is subject to natural decline at a rate that is determined by the sunk development investment and the geology of the reserve. Decisions are far more complicated, and results far subtler, than in the Hotelling framework. Given a price path, we show that almost any form of tax causes a reduction in the level of development and initial production, thereby contradicting the hypothesis of the green paradox.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
绿色悖论,一个霍特林的道德准则
绿色悖论是这样一种效应:为了追踪二氧化碳排放造成的损害,对每单位石油生产征收越来越多的税,导致全球产量在短期内增加,价格下降。在霍特林的可耗尽资源模型中,这种增长是一种理性的反应。我们模拟了一个接受价格的生产者对不同形式的税收做出的决定。与Hotelling模式不同的是,我们的开采技术涉及不可逆的、块状的勘探和开发投资。此外,我们假设已开发储量的产出受制于自然下降的速度,该速度由沉没的开发投资和储量的地质情况决定。与霍特林的框架相比,决策要复杂得多,结果也微妙得多。给定价格路径,我们表明几乎任何形式的税收都会导致发展水平和初始生产水平的降低,从而与绿色悖论的假设相矛盾。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
22
期刊最新文献
Energy Network Innovation for Green Transition: Economic Issues and Regulatory Options Model-Based Evaluation of Decentralised Electricity Markets at Different Phases of the German Energy Transition Socio-technical Inertia: Understanding the Barriers to Distributed Generation in Pakistan Residential Welfare-Loss from Electricity Supply Interruptions in South Africa: Cost-Benefit Analysis of Distributed Energy Resource Subsidy Programs Cost Efficiency Evaluation of Thermal Power Plants in Bangladesh Using a Two-Stage DEA Model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1