BAUS oncology guidance for implementing streamlining in cancer MDT meetings: Selecting standards of care and operational considerations

IF 0.2 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Journal of Clinical Urology Pub Date : 2023-05-02 DOI:10.1177/20514158231168463
B. Lamb, K. Linton, K. Narahari
{"title":"BAUS oncology guidance for implementing streamlining in cancer MDT meetings: Selecting standards of care and operational considerations","authors":"B. Lamb, K. Linton, K. Narahari","doi":"10.1177/20514158231168463","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is widely recognised that multidisciplinary team meetings (MDTMs) are the cornerstone of cancer practice in the United Kingdom and many countries around the world. While MDTMs offer several key benefits to patients, healthcare professionals and cancer registration, data and audit services, in the United Kingdom they have over time become too large, onerous and ‘transactional’ often discussing cases that have a pre-determined management plan. In response to this growing problem, National Health Service (NHS) England and NHS Improvement produced an multidisciplinary team (MDT) streamlining document as a guide to encourage MDTM to consider a ‘Standard of Care’ (SoC) approach to conditions with a predictable agreed management plan based on national, regional cancer network or local cancer unit protocols. This would then enable more meaningful discussion of complex cases with in the MDT. This document did not gain much traction and had little impact on UK urological cancer MDTM. As a result, The British Association of Urological Surgeons (BAUS) was approached by the NHS Getting It Right First Time (GIRFT) Leads in 2021 to promote an SoC-based streamlining to urological cancer MDT working. Having consulted widely with colleagues, cancer networks and cancer delivery teams, the BAUS Section of Oncology sought views from its membership during a dedicated MDTM session in the Sections of Oncology Meeting, December 2021. From this extensive engagement with stakeholders, we have put together the following guidance for use as a framework to facilitate the agreement of local policies in the interests of supporting the needs of patients and MDTs. Level of evidence: level 5 (Expert opinions based on non-systematic reviews of results or mechanistic studies)","PeriodicalId":15471,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Urology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20514158231168463","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

It is widely recognised that multidisciplinary team meetings (MDTMs) are the cornerstone of cancer practice in the United Kingdom and many countries around the world. While MDTMs offer several key benefits to patients, healthcare professionals and cancer registration, data and audit services, in the United Kingdom they have over time become too large, onerous and ‘transactional’ often discussing cases that have a pre-determined management plan. In response to this growing problem, National Health Service (NHS) England and NHS Improvement produced an multidisciplinary team (MDT) streamlining document as a guide to encourage MDTM to consider a ‘Standard of Care’ (SoC) approach to conditions with a predictable agreed management plan based on national, regional cancer network or local cancer unit protocols. This would then enable more meaningful discussion of complex cases with in the MDT. This document did not gain much traction and had little impact on UK urological cancer MDTM. As a result, The British Association of Urological Surgeons (BAUS) was approached by the NHS Getting It Right First Time (GIRFT) Leads in 2021 to promote an SoC-based streamlining to urological cancer MDT working. Having consulted widely with colleagues, cancer networks and cancer delivery teams, the BAUS Section of Oncology sought views from its membership during a dedicated MDTM session in the Sections of Oncology Meeting, December 2021. From this extensive engagement with stakeholders, we have put together the following guidance for use as a framework to facilitate the agreement of local policies in the interests of supporting the needs of patients and MDTs. Level of evidence: level 5 (Expert opinions based on non-systematic reviews of results or mechanistic studies)
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
BAUS肿瘤学指导在癌症MDT会议中实施精简:选择护理标准和操作考虑因素
人们普遍认识到,多学科团队会议(MDTM)是英国和世界许多国家癌症实践的基石。虽然MDTM为患者、医疗保健专业人员和癌症注册、数据和审计服务提供了几个关键好处,但在英国,随着时间的推移,它们变得过于庞大、繁重和“交易性”,经常讨论有预先确定的管理计划的病例。为了应对这一日益严重的问题,英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)和英国国家医疗保健体系改善组织(NHS Improvement)制定了一份多学科团队(MDT)精简文件,作为指导,鼓励MDTM考虑采用“护理标准”(SoC)方法来应对疾病,并根据国家、区域癌症网络或当地癌症单位协议制定可预测的商定管理计划。这样可以在MDT中对复杂案例进行更有意义的讨论。该文件没有获得太多的吸引力,对英国泌尿外科癌症MDTM几乎没有影响。因此,英国泌尿外科医师协会(BAUS)于2021年获得了英国国家医疗服务体系(GIRFT)领导的接洽,以促进基于SoC的泌尿外科癌症MDT精简工作。在广泛咨询了同事、癌症网络和癌症交付团队后,BAUS肿瘤科在2021年12月肿瘤科会议的MDTM专题会议上征求了其成员的意见。通过与利益相关者的广泛接触,我们制定了以下指导意见,作为促进地方政策达成一致的框架,以支持患者和MDT的需求。证据级别:5级(基于对结果或机制研究的非系统审查的专家意见)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Urology
Journal of Clinical Urology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Diagnostic value of the abnormal digital rectal examination in the modern MRI-based prostate cancer diagnostic pathway. Comparison of the diagnostic utility of CHOKAI, STONE and STONE PLUS scores in predicting ureteral stones larger than 5 mm Quality of life and healthcare resource use in patients with bladder pain syndrome: A survey of UK patients Analysis of the learning curve for Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for a single surgeon Effectiveness of intravesical glycosaminoglycans in the treatment of recurrent urinary tract infections: Systematic review and meta-analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1