No More “Solutionism” or “Saviourism” in Futuring African HCI: A Manyfesto

IF 4.8 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, CYBERNETICS ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction Pub Date : 2022-11-22 DOI:10.1145/3571811
M. Adamu
{"title":"No More “Solutionism” or “Saviourism” in Futuring African HCI: A Manyfesto","authors":"M. Adamu","doi":"10.1145/3571811","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research in HCI4D has continuously advanced a narrative of “lacks” and “gaps” of the African perspective in technoscience. In response to such misguided assumptions, this article attempts to reformulate the common and perhaps unfortunate thinking about African practices of design in HCI4D – i.e., largely as a function of African societal predicaments and Western technocratic resolutions. Through critical reflection on a range of issues associated with post-colonialism and post-development, I examine the possibilities that various historical tropes might offer to the reinvention of the African perspective on innovation. This leads to the consideration of how engaging in critical discussions about the future dimensions of African HCI can allow for grappling with the effect of the coloniality of being, power, and knowledge. Developing on the ideas of futuring as a way of dealing with the complexities of the present—in this case, the coloniality of the imagination—the article ends by discussing three tactical propositions for “remembering” future identities of African innovation where the values of autonomy are known and acted upon.","PeriodicalId":50917,"journal":{"name":"ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3571811","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, CYBERNETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Research in HCI4D has continuously advanced a narrative of “lacks” and “gaps” of the African perspective in technoscience. In response to such misguided assumptions, this article attempts to reformulate the common and perhaps unfortunate thinking about African practices of design in HCI4D – i.e., largely as a function of African societal predicaments and Western technocratic resolutions. Through critical reflection on a range of issues associated with post-colonialism and post-development, I examine the possibilities that various historical tropes might offer to the reinvention of the African perspective on innovation. This leads to the consideration of how engaging in critical discussions about the future dimensions of African HCI can allow for grappling with the effect of the coloniality of being, power, and knowledge. Developing on the ideas of futuring as a way of dealing with the complexities of the present—in this case, the coloniality of the imagination—the article ends by discussing three tactical propositions for “remembering” future identities of African innovation where the values of autonomy are known and acted upon.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
未来非洲人力资源管理不再是“解决方案主义”或“救世主主义”
HCI4D的研究不断推进非洲技术科学视角的“缺失”和“差距”叙述。为了回应这些被误导的假设,本文试图重新阐述关于HCI4D中非洲设计实践的常见和可能不幸的想法-即,主要作为非洲社会困境和西方技术官僚解决方案的功能。通过对一系列与后殖民主义和后发展相关的问题的批判性反思,我研究了各种历史比喻可能为重塑非洲创新视角提供的可能性。这就需要考虑如何参与关于非洲人力资本基础设施未来维度的批判性讨论,以应对存在、权力和知识的殖民影响。将未来作为一种处理现在的复杂性的方法——在这种情况下,是想象的殖民性——这篇文章最后讨论了“记住”非洲创新的未来身份的三个策略命题,在这些创新中,自治的价值是已知的并被采取行动的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction
ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 工程技术-计算机:控制论
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
5.40%
发文量
94
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: This ACM Transaction seeks to be the premier archival journal in the multidisciplinary field of human-computer interaction. Since its first issue in March 1994, it has presented work of the highest scientific quality that contributes to the practice in the present and future. The primary emphasis is on results of broad application, but the journal considers original work focused on specific domains, on special requirements, on ethical issues -- the full range of design, development, and use of interactive systems.
期刊最新文献
Unmaking electronic waste Household Wattch: Exploring opportunities for surveillance and consent through families’ household energy use data Self-Determination Theory and HCI Games Research: Unfulfilled Promises and Unquestioned Paradigms Carefully Unmaking the “Marginalized User:” A Diffractive Analysis of a Gay Online Community Gazing Heads: Investigating Gaze Perception in Video-Mediated Communication
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1