Assessing the resilience of organizations in the context of uncertainty

IF 2.5 Q3 BUSINESS Measuring Business Excellence Pub Date : 2022-08-23 DOI:10.1108/mbe-05-2022-0066
I. Bartuševičienė, Ona Grazhina Rakauskiene, Asta Valackienė
{"title":"Assessing the resilience of organizations in the context of uncertainty","authors":"I. Bartuševičienė, Ona Grazhina Rakauskiene, Asta Valackienė","doi":"10.1108/mbe-05-2022-0066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe purpose of this paper is to define the main dimensions/aspects of resilient organizations and propose a benchmarking model to assess an organization's resilience in the context of uncertainty.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe systematic literature review method was applied to collect and synthesize relevant scientific literature from 2001 to 2022 to construct and validate a methodological approach.\n\n\nFindings\nThis paper proposes a conceptualization of organizational resilience as the capacity of an organization to first remain stable; then prepare, absorb and recover after a crisis; adapt to the new environment; and, finally, use the developed experience to enhance the capacity for transformation, playing an essential role for coping with uncertainty.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nResilience is recognized as organizations’ ability to adapt to the new conditions, influenced by the crises. Moreover, it supports the recognition of the learning phase that allows for growth by constantly learning from emerging situations and gaining unique experiences. These observations allow us to suggest the twofold approach. The first distinguishes the resilience as organizations’ ability to adapt to the changing environment, that is, bounce back, while the second highlights the importance of learning capacity, that is, bounce forward.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThe authors suggest to adopt the conceptual framework of the bounce forward phenomenon using the Resilient Organizations’ Resilience Benchmark Tool to assess organizational resilience. This would determine the overall resilience by identifying the links between bouncing back (preparing, absorbing, recovering and adapting) and bouncing forward (enhancing learning capacity).\n\n\nOriginality/value\nHaving reviewed the methodologies in the extant literature to evaluate organizational resilience and explored the similarities and differences between them, the authors concluded that the Resilient Organizations Resilience Benchmark Tool (2017) is the most appropriate three-dimensional tool because of its universality and comprehensive scope. These three dimensions consist of: leadership and culture; networks; and change readiness. This methodology assesses organizations' perspectives regarding resilience based on their ability to respond to and manage crises and their ability to bounce forward successfully.\n","PeriodicalId":18468,"journal":{"name":"Measuring Business Excellence","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Measuring Business Excellence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/mbe-05-2022-0066","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to define the main dimensions/aspects of resilient organizations and propose a benchmarking model to assess an organization's resilience in the context of uncertainty. Design/methodology/approach The systematic literature review method was applied to collect and synthesize relevant scientific literature from 2001 to 2022 to construct and validate a methodological approach. Findings This paper proposes a conceptualization of organizational resilience as the capacity of an organization to first remain stable; then prepare, absorb and recover after a crisis; adapt to the new environment; and, finally, use the developed experience to enhance the capacity for transformation, playing an essential role for coping with uncertainty. Research limitations/implications Resilience is recognized as organizations’ ability to adapt to the new conditions, influenced by the crises. Moreover, it supports the recognition of the learning phase that allows for growth by constantly learning from emerging situations and gaining unique experiences. These observations allow us to suggest the twofold approach. The first distinguishes the resilience as organizations’ ability to adapt to the changing environment, that is, bounce back, while the second highlights the importance of learning capacity, that is, bounce forward. Practical implications The authors suggest to adopt the conceptual framework of the bounce forward phenomenon using the Resilient Organizations’ Resilience Benchmark Tool to assess organizational resilience. This would determine the overall resilience by identifying the links between bouncing back (preparing, absorbing, recovering and adapting) and bouncing forward (enhancing learning capacity). Originality/value Having reviewed the methodologies in the extant literature to evaluate organizational resilience and explored the similarities and differences between them, the authors concluded that the Resilient Organizations Resilience Benchmark Tool (2017) is the most appropriate three-dimensional tool because of its universality and comprehensive scope. These three dimensions consist of: leadership and culture; networks; and change readiness. This methodology assesses organizations' perspectives regarding resilience based on their ability to respond to and manage crises and their ability to bounce forward successfully.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估组织在不确定性背景下的复原力
目的本文的目的是定义弹性组织的主要维度/方面,并提出一个基准模型来评估组织在不确定性背景下的弹性。设计/方法论/方法应用系统文献综述方法收集和综合2001年至2022年的相关科学文献,构建和验证方法论方法。发现本文提出了组织弹性的概念,即组织首先保持稳定的能力;然后在危机后做好准备、吸收和恢复;适应新环境;最后,利用发展起来的经验来增强转型能力,在应对不确定性方面发挥重要作用。研究局限性/含义弹性被认为是组织适应受危机影响的新条件的能力。此外,它支持对学习阶段的认识,即通过不断从新出现的情况中学习和获得独特的经验来实现成长。这些观察结果使我们能够提出双重方法。第一种将韧性区分为组织适应不断变化的环境的能力,即反弹,而第二种则强调了学习能力的重要性,即反弹。实际含义作者建议采用反弹现象的概念框架,使用弹性组织的弹性基准工具来评估组织的弹性。这将通过确定反弹(准备、吸收、恢复和适应)和向前反弹(提高学习能力)之间的联系来确定整体韧性。独创性/价值回顾了现有文献中评估组织韧性的方法,并探讨了它们之间的异同,作者得出结论,弹性组织弹性基准工具(2017)是最合适的三维工具,因为它具有普遍性和全面性。这三个维度包括:领导力和文化;网络;以及变革准备。该方法基于组织应对和管理危机的能力以及成功反弹的能力,评估组织对复原力的看法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
4.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: Measuring Business Excellence provides international insights into non-financial ways to measure and manage business performance improvements and company’s value creation dynamics. Measuring Business Excellence will enable you to apply best practice, implement innovative thinking and learn how to use different practices. Learn how to use innovative frameworks, approaches and practices for understanding, assessing and managing the strategic value drivers of business excellence. MBE publishes both rigorous academic research and insightful practical experiences about the development and adoption of assessment and management models, tools and approaches to support excellence and value creation of 21st century organizations both private and public.
期刊最新文献
Information technology and business strategic alignment in small and medium organizations: an exploratory study in Mexico Navigating digital transformation and business model innovation in the tourism sector: challenges opportunities, and leadership styles Evolving landscape of performance measurement research: a bibliometric analysis From sustainability to financial performance: the role of SDG disclosure Achieving competitiveness through innovation capability: developing what public sector customers really need
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1