Stemming the Tide of Disinformation in Public Health

Marie Derstroff, Victoria E. Härtling, Wilhelmiina Hölttä, Mike H. Traub, Linda A. P. J. van der Linden, James C. Thomas
{"title":"Stemming the Tide of Disinformation in Public Health","authors":"Marie Derstroff, Victoria E. Härtling, Wilhelmiina Hölttä, Mike H. Traub, Linda A. P. J. van der Linden, James C. Thomas","doi":"10.56801/seejph.vi.374","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Context: Disinformation, or incorrect information that is intended to mislead, was pronounced during the COVID pandemic. Disinformation that steers away from life-saving practices or toward life-threatening practices can be fatal. The European Union has in place policies and offices to combat disinformation. However, they lack the full mandate and clarity of systems to meet the needs for quick and effective responses.Policy Options:Means to enhance the effectiveness of existing policies include [1] clarifying a rapid response framework, [2] enhancing media literacy in the public, [3] inoculating the public against anticipated disinformation, and [4] engendering public trust through coordinated and consistent communication. \nRecommendations:Among these four, options 2 and 3 were deemed the best opportunities for quick action, early successes, and the fewest institutional or political hurdles. We recommend [a] that the EU Commission establishes an EU Media Agency with a solid governance structure to support innovative media literacy undertakings and successful implementation; [b] that the existing Media Literacy Expert Group create a media literacy program implementation framework; and [c] that existing EU initiatives on disinformation debunking, media literacy, and inoculation strategies be merged into a single Misinformation Community within the European Institute of Innovation and Technology [EIT].","PeriodicalId":37037,"journal":{"name":"South Eastern European Journal of Public Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South Eastern European Journal of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56801/seejph.vi.374","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: Disinformation, or incorrect information that is intended to mislead, was pronounced during the COVID pandemic. Disinformation that steers away from life-saving practices or toward life-threatening practices can be fatal. The European Union has in place policies and offices to combat disinformation. However, they lack the full mandate and clarity of systems to meet the needs for quick and effective responses.Policy Options:Means to enhance the effectiveness of existing policies include [1] clarifying a rapid response framework, [2] enhancing media literacy in the public, [3] inoculating the public against anticipated disinformation, and [4] engendering public trust through coordinated and consistent communication. Recommendations:Among these four, options 2 and 3 were deemed the best opportunities for quick action, early successes, and the fewest institutional or political hurdles. We recommend [a] that the EU Commission establishes an EU Media Agency with a solid governance structure to support innovative media literacy undertakings and successful implementation; [b] that the existing Media Literacy Expert Group create a media literacy program implementation framework; and [c] that existing EU initiatives on disinformation debunking, media literacy, and inoculation strategies be merged into a single Misinformation Community within the European Institute of Innovation and Technology [EIT].
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
遏制公共卫生领域的虚假信息浪潮
背景:在新冠肺炎疫情期间,虚假信息或旨在误导的错误信息很明显。远离拯救生命的做法或走向危及生命的做法的消毒可能是致命的。欧洲联盟制定了打击虚假信息的政策和办公室。然而,它们缺乏充分的授权和明确的制度,无法满足快速有效反应的需要。政策选择:提高现有政策有效性的手段包括[1]澄清快速反应框架,[2]提高公众的媒体素养,[3]为公众接种预防预期虚假信息的疫苗,[4]通过协调一致的沟通建立公众信任。建议:在这四个方案中,备选方案2和3被认为是采取快速行动、尽早取得成功的最佳机会,也是体制或政治障碍最少的方案。我们建议欧盟委员会建立一个具有坚实治理结构的欧盟媒体机构,以支持创新的媒体扫盲事业和成功实施;[b] 现有的媒体扫盲专家组制定了一个媒体扫盲方案实施框架;以及[c]将欧盟关于揭穿虚假信息、媒体素养和接种策略的现有举措合并为欧洲创新与技术研究所内的一个虚假信息社区。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Policy Recommendations to Improve Mental Health in Polish Prisons Sustainable Reform of European Union (EU): Common Fisheries Policy On Urgently Tackling the Mosquito-Borne Diseases in the European Union Beyond Silos: A Call to Include Hospital Support Staff in Cultural Competency Training Out of cars, onto the cycle paths: Aligning Granada's traffic infrastructure with the European Green Deal
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1