Occupational therapy students’ preferences for teaching and course design across a three-year undergraduate education program

Q3 Health Professions Irish Journal of Occupational Therapy Pub Date : 2022-05-04 DOI:10.1108/ijot-03-2022-0012
Even Elias Edvardsen, Eline Fjærestad Dalseth, S. Johnson, Linda Stigen, Gry Mørk, Trine A. Magne, A. Gramstad, M. Småstuen, T. Bonsaksen
{"title":"Occupational therapy students’ preferences for teaching and course design across a three-year undergraduate education program","authors":"Even Elias Edvardsen, Eline Fjærestad Dalseth, S. Johnson, Linda Stigen, Gry Mørk, Trine A. Magne, A. Gramstad, M. Småstuen, T. Bonsaksen","doi":"10.1108/ijot-03-2022-0012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nUnderstanding students’ preferences for teaching and course design is important for educators in higher education when planning courses and teaching activities. The purpose of this study was to explore changes in occupational therapy students’ preferences for teaching and courses across the three-year study program.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nA total of 263 students participated in a longitudinal study, where preferences were measured with the Approaches and Study Skills Inventory for Students. The data were analyzed with linear mixed effect models for repeated measures.\n\n\nFindings\nThe results indicated no significant changes in preferences for courses and teaching over the three-year period. Also, there were no significant differences between the six involved study programs. Preferences for the courses and teaching type “supporting understanding” were associated with higher age and higher study effort. Preferences for the courses and teaching type “transmitting information” were associated with lower age and female gender.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nIn summary, the findings of this study suggest that preferences for teaching and courses are stable and may be challenging to alter during a three-year undergraduate study program.\n","PeriodicalId":36571,"journal":{"name":"Irish Journal of Occupational Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Irish Journal of Occupational Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijot-03-2022-0012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose Understanding students’ preferences for teaching and course design is important for educators in higher education when planning courses and teaching activities. The purpose of this study was to explore changes in occupational therapy students’ preferences for teaching and courses across the three-year study program. Design/methodology/approach A total of 263 students participated in a longitudinal study, where preferences were measured with the Approaches and Study Skills Inventory for Students. The data were analyzed with linear mixed effect models for repeated measures. Findings The results indicated no significant changes in preferences for courses and teaching over the three-year period. Also, there were no significant differences between the six involved study programs. Preferences for the courses and teaching type “supporting understanding” were associated with higher age and higher study effort. Preferences for the courses and teaching type “transmitting information” were associated with lower age and female gender. Originality/value In summary, the findings of this study suggest that preferences for teaching and courses are stable and may be challenging to alter during a three-year undergraduate study program.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
职业治疗学生对三年制本科教育项目教学和课程设计的偏好
目的了解学生对教学和课程设计的偏好对于高等教育工作者在规划课程和教学活动时非常重要。本研究的目的是探索在为期三年的研究项目中,职业治疗学生对教学和课程偏好的变化。设计/方法论/方法共有263名学生参加了一项纵向研究,通过学生方法和学习技能量表来衡量他们的偏好。采用重复测量的线性混合效应模型对数据进行分析。调查结果表明,在三年的时间里,对课程和教学的偏好没有显著变化。此外,六个相关研究项目之间也没有显著差异。对“支持理解”课程和教学类型的偏好与更高的年龄和更高的学习努力有关。对“传递信息”课程和教学类型的偏好与较低的年龄和女性有关。原创性/价值总之,这项研究的结果表明,对教学和课程的偏好是稳定的,在三年制的本科生学习计划中可能很难改变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Irish Journal of Occupational Therapy
Irish Journal of Occupational Therapy Health Professions-Occupational Therapy
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Editorial: Driving innovation: harnessing the power of patient input in research Current clinical practice of Irish physiotherapists and occupational therapists in the assessment and treatment of spasticity in adults Scoping review of free evidence summary sources available online, relevant to occupational therapists working with children/youth, and families Exploring the non-vocational outcomes of the individual placement and support (IPS) employment model Attention Autism™ training for occupational therapists: a pilot study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1