Prediction from early childhood vocabulary to academic achievement at the end of compulsory schooling in Denmark

IF 2.4 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL International Journal of Behavioral Development Pub Date : 2022-08-16 DOI:10.1177/01650254221116878
P. Dale, Alexander Paul, M. Rosholm, Dorthe Bleses
{"title":"Prediction from early childhood vocabulary to academic achievement at the end of compulsory schooling in Denmark","authors":"P. Dale, Alexander Paul, M. Rosholm, Dorthe Bleses","doi":"10.1177/01650254221116878","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Prediction from early development to later achievement has the potential to improve clinical and educational service delivery as well as to inform developmental theory. In this longitudinal study, we asked how well can educational achievement measured in the final year (Grade 9, age 15) of compulsory education—both overall and for outcomes in the lowest 20%—be predicted from information available in the first 3 years of life, particularly early expressive vocabulary? Measures for 2,767 children (1,345 males, 1,422 females) aged 16 to 30 months on early expressive vocabulary, along with family socioeconomic status (parental education, occupation, and household income), other demographic information (gender, birth order, parental age, social benefits, etc.), timing and nature of early child care, and early home literacy experience, were used to predict performance on Danish Upper Secondary School Leaving Exam (USSLE) in Danish, English, Math, and Science. A cross-validated combination of Lasso (Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator) and ordinary least squares regression was the primary analysis for continuous outcomes and cross-validated Lasso and logistic regression for categorical outcomes. With respect to continuous outcome measures, the patterns of prediction varied with specific domain; R2 ranged from 9.4% to 21.4%. With respect to low USSLE performance, area under the curve statistics ranged from 64.1% to 72.2%. In all domains, early childhood expressive vocabulary made a significant unique contribution to the outcome when measured over the full range. The prediction was also significant for vocabulary to low Danish and English scores although not for Math and Science. Although the predictions were not strong enough for clinical diagnosis on their own, they demonstrate that low early vocabulary is an important and measurable risk condition that can direct early intervention and thus contribute to later educational attainment.","PeriodicalId":13880,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Behavioral Development","volume":"47 1","pages":"123 - 134"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Behavioral Development","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01650254221116878","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Prediction from early development to later achievement has the potential to improve clinical and educational service delivery as well as to inform developmental theory. In this longitudinal study, we asked how well can educational achievement measured in the final year (Grade 9, age 15) of compulsory education—both overall and for outcomes in the lowest 20%—be predicted from information available in the first 3 years of life, particularly early expressive vocabulary? Measures for 2,767 children (1,345 males, 1,422 females) aged 16 to 30 months on early expressive vocabulary, along with family socioeconomic status (parental education, occupation, and household income), other demographic information (gender, birth order, parental age, social benefits, etc.), timing and nature of early child care, and early home literacy experience, were used to predict performance on Danish Upper Secondary School Leaving Exam (USSLE) in Danish, English, Math, and Science. A cross-validated combination of Lasso (Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator) and ordinary least squares regression was the primary analysis for continuous outcomes and cross-validated Lasso and logistic regression for categorical outcomes. With respect to continuous outcome measures, the patterns of prediction varied with specific domain; R2 ranged from 9.4% to 21.4%. With respect to low USSLE performance, area under the curve statistics ranged from 64.1% to 72.2%. In all domains, early childhood expressive vocabulary made a significant unique contribution to the outcome when measured over the full range. The prediction was also significant for vocabulary to low Danish and English scores although not for Math and Science. Although the predictions were not strong enough for clinical diagnosis on their own, they demonstrate that low early vocabulary is an important and measurable risk condition that can direct early intervention and thus contribute to later educational attainment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
丹麦义务教育结束时幼儿词汇对学业成绩的预测
从早期发展到后期成就的预测有可能改善临床和教育服务的提供,并为发展理论提供信息。在这项纵向研究中,我们问,从生命前3年的可用信息,特别是早期表达词汇,可以在多大程度上预测义务教育最后一年(9年级,15岁)的教育成绩——无论是总体成绩还是最低20%的成绩?针对2767名16至30岁儿童(1345名男性,1422名女性)的措施 早期表达词汇的月数,以及家庭社会经济地位(父母教育、职业和家庭收入)、其他人口统计信息(性别、出生顺序、父母年龄、社会福利等)、早期儿童保育的时间和性质以及早期家庭识字经历,被用来预测丹麦高中毕业考试(USSLE)的丹麦语成绩,英语、数学和科学。Lasso(最小绝对收缩和选择算子)和普通最小二乘回归的交叉验证组合是连续结果的主要分析,Lasso和逻辑回归是分类结果的交叉验证。关于连续结果衡量,预测模式因具体领域而异;R2在9.4%-21.4%之间。关于低USSLE表现,曲线下面积统计在64.1%-72.2%之间。在所有领域中,当在整个范围内测量时,幼儿表达词汇对结果做出了显著的独特贡献。这一预测对丹麦语和英语成绩较低的词汇也很重要,尽管对数学和科学没有影响。尽管这些预测本身不足以进行临床诊断,但它们表明,早期词汇量低是一种重要且可测量的风险状况,可以指导早期干预,从而有助于后期的教育水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
48
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Behavioral Development is the official journal of the International Society for the Study of Behavioural Development, which exists to promote the discovery, dissemination and application of knowledge about developmental processes at all stages of the life span - infancy, childhood, adolescence, adulthood and old age. The Journal is already the leading international outlet devoted to reporting interdisciplinary research on behavioural development, and has now, in response to the rapidly developing fields of behavioural genetics, neuroscience and developmental psychopathology, expanded its scope to these and other related new domains of scholarship. In this way, it provides a truly world-wide platform for researchers which can facilitate a greater integrated lifespan perspective. In addition to original empirical research, the Journal also publishes theoretical and review papers, methodological papers, and other work of scientific interest that represents a significant advance in the understanding of any aspect of behavioural development. The Journal also publishes papers on behaviour development research within or across particular geographical regions. Papers are therefore considered from a wide range of disciplines, covering all aspects of the lifespan. Articles on topics of eminent current interest, such as research on the later life phases, biological processes in behaviour development, cross-national, and cross-cultural issues, and interdisciplinary research in general, are particularly welcome.
期刊最新文献
Social support moderates the link between chronic peer victimization in school and later cortisol secretion Are narrative story stem methods valid in “non-Western” contexts? A systematic review Psychometric evaluation of a brief measure to capture general population-level variation in ADHD symptoms from childhood through the transition to adulthood A longitudinal study of parents’ home-safety practices to prevent injuries during infancy The current practice of latent growth curve modeling in the social and behavioral sciences: Observations and recommendations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1