From purely physical to purely online pharmacies: exploring different shopper profiles and discussing some widespread beliefs

Jorge Vera-Martínez
{"title":"From purely physical to purely online pharmacies: exploring different shopper profiles and discussing some widespread beliefs","authors":"Jorge Vera-Martínez","doi":"10.1108/ijphm-08-2021-0088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nUp until now, some internet shopper profiles based on certain findings have been generally accepted. It is widely believed that internet shoppers tend to be more innovative, less averse to risk, more variety-seeking, more information-seeking, more impulsive and more interested in pursuing convenience. This paper aims to discuss some of these assumed characteristics by contrasting and comparing customers of three different types of pharmacies.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThree exploratory-descriptive design studies are conducted to profile customers from three different types of pharmacies in Mexico. Data from three samples are assessed, including 198 customers of physical drugstores without an e-channel, 150 customers of physical pharmacies with an e-channel and 271 customers of online pharmacies.\n\n\nFindings\nShoppers from physical pharmacies purchase more food and drinks than actual medicine. Shoppers from physical pharmacies with e-channels tend to use the internet to acquire information about pharmaceutical products but do not make purchases online; they prefer to obtain products immediately from a physical drugstore instead of waiting for delivery from an e-channel. Contrasting with the two former customer types, shoppers who use e-pharmacies are specific in the numbers and types of products they purchase, medicines being the main priority.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe three types of customers and their preferred shopping platforms may show important profile differences. Despite the evidence in previous literature, shoppers at physical pharmacies are not necessarily non-convenience oriented (time and effort), noninformation analyzing, non-price conscious or less positive in their attitude about shopping; instead, they may simply be averse to technology.\n","PeriodicalId":51798,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Pharmaceutical and Healthcare Marketing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Pharmaceutical and Healthcare Marketing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijphm-08-2021-0088","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose Up until now, some internet shopper profiles based on certain findings have been generally accepted. It is widely believed that internet shoppers tend to be more innovative, less averse to risk, more variety-seeking, more information-seeking, more impulsive and more interested in pursuing convenience. This paper aims to discuss some of these assumed characteristics by contrasting and comparing customers of three different types of pharmacies. Design/methodology/approach Three exploratory-descriptive design studies are conducted to profile customers from three different types of pharmacies in Mexico. Data from three samples are assessed, including 198 customers of physical drugstores without an e-channel, 150 customers of physical pharmacies with an e-channel and 271 customers of online pharmacies. Findings Shoppers from physical pharmacies purchase more food and drinks than actual medicine. Shoppers from physical pharmacies with e-channels tend to use the internet to acquire information about pharmaceutical products but do not make purchases online; they prefer to obtain products immediately from a physical drugstore instead of waiting for delivery from an e-channel. Contrasting with the two former customer types, shoppers who use e-pharmacies are specific in the numbers and types of products they purchase, medicines being the main priority. Originality/value The three types of customers and their preferred shopping platforms may show important profile differences. Despite the evidence in previous literature, shoppers at physical pharmacies are not necessarily non-convenience oriented (time and effort), noninformation analyzing, non-price conscious or less positive in their attitude about shopping; instead, they may simply be averse to technology.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从纯实体药店到纯在线药店:探索不同的购物者档案并讨论一些普遍的信念
目的到目前为止,一些基于某些调查结果的网上购物者档案已被普遍接受。人们普遍认为,互联网购物者往往更具创新性,不太规避风险,更追求多样性,更寻求信息,更冲动,更热衷于追求便利。本文旨在通过对比和比较三种不同类型药店的顾客来讨论其中的一些假定特征。设计/方法/方法进行了三项探索性描述性设计研究,以介绍墨西哥三种不同类型药店的顾客。评估了三个样本的数据,包括198名没有电子渠道的实体药店顾客、150名有电子渠道的实物药店顾客和271名在线药店顾客。发现实体药店的购物者购买的食品和饮料比实际购买的药品多。拥有电子渠道的实体药店的购物者倾向于使用互联网获取药品信息,但不在网上购买;他们更喜欢立即从实体药店获得产品,而不是等待从电子渠道发货。与以前的两种客户类型相比,使用电子药品的购物者在购买产品的数量和类型上是特定的,药品是主要的优先事项。创意/价值这三种类型的客户及其首选的购物平台可能会显示出重要的个人资料差异。尽管有以前的文献中的证据,但实体药店的购物者并不一定不以便利为导向(时间和精力)、不进行信息分析、不注重价格或对购物的态度不那么积极;相反,他们可能只是反对技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
21
期刊最新文献
Purchase intent in social media for healthcare services: the influence of value co-creation, brand equity and engagement Revealing the synergetic influence of pharmaceutical marketing strategies on physician prescription patterns: a moderated mediation investigation COVID-sumers: consumers’ feelings due Covid-19 pandemic in Brazil and potential implications for services marketing Role of fashion-consciousness, health-awareness and environmental concerns on millennials’ usage of smartwatches Managing my own health! An ancillary outlook on pharmaceutical and health supplements consumption
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1