Nose-gaping: The Smells of Mason & Dixon The Smells of Mason & Dixon

Q2 Arts and Humanities Orbit (Cambridge) Pub Date : 2019-07-30 DOI:10.16995/ORBIT.768
M. Phillips
{"title":"Nose-gaping: The Smells of Mason & Dixon The Smells of Mason & Dixon","authors":"M. Phillips","doi":"10.16995/ORBIT.768","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines Pynchon’s evocations of smell in Mason & Dixon as a vehicle for critiquing notions of the rational subject and the bounded text. The nose is posed as a carnivalesque counterpart to the eye, the sense organ most readily associated with empiricism. The directional gaze, crucial to the eponymous characters’ work as astronomer and surveyor, often gives way to enveloping odors, producing an embodiment inimical to Enlightenment. Anthropologist David Howes has argued that smell is most vividly experienced in liminal spaces or at cognitive thresholds. I draw on his work to illuminate Pynchon’s association of smells with the dissolution of distinctions between abstract categories like civilization/wilderness, mind/body, past/present, and text/reader. I argue that this novel about the delineation of a boundary is primarily concerned with interpretive indeterminacy, figured and produced through textual smells.","PeriodicalId":37450,"journal":{"name":"Orbit (Cambridge)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orbit (Cambridge)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.16995/ORBIT.768","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article examines Pynchon’s evocations of smell in Mason & Dixon as a vehicle for critiquing notions of the rational subject and the bounded text. The nose is posed as a carnivalesque counterpart to the eye, the sense organ most readily associated with empiricism. The directional gaze, crucial to the eponymous characters’ work as astronomer and surveyor, often gives way to enveloping odors, producing an embodiment inimical to Enlightenment. Anthropologist David Howes has argued that smell is most vividly experienced in liminal spaces or at cognitive thresholds. I draw on his work to illuminate Pynchon’s association of smells with the dissolution of distinctions between abstract categories like civilization/wilderness, mind/body, past/present, and text/reader. I argue that this novel about the delineation of a boundary is primarily concerned with interpretive indeterminacy, figured and produced through textual smells.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
目瞪口呆:梅森和迪克森的气味梅森和迪克逊的气味
本文考察了品钦在《梅森与迪克森》中对气味的唤起,以此作为批判理性主体和有界文本概念的工具。鼻子被塑造成与眼睛的嘉年华式对应物,眼睛是最容易与经验主义联系在一起的感觉器官。定向凝视对同名人物作为天文学家和测量员的工作至关重要,通常会让位于包裹气味,产生一种不利于启蒙运动的体现。人类学家David Howes认为,嗅觉在极限空间或认知阈值中体验得最为生动。我利用他的作品来阐明品钦对气味的联想,以及对抽象类别之间区别的消解,如文明/荒野、心灵/身体、过去/现在和文本/读者。我认为,这部关于边界划定的小说主要涉及解释的不确定性,通过文本气味来描绘和产生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Orbit (Cambridge)
Orbit (Cambridge) Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Orbit: Writing Around Pynchon is a journal that publishes high quality, rigorously reviewed and innovative scholarly material on the works of Thomas Pynchon, related authors and adjacent fields in 20th- and 21st-century literature. We publish special and general issues in a rolling format, which brings together a traditional journal article style with the latest publishing technology to ensure faster, yet prestigious, publication for authors.
期刊最新文献
The Flight of the Junky: Existential Posthumanism and Immanent Life in Early Burroughs Forget-me-not: Giving Voice to Memory in Mark Z. Danielewski's "The Familiar" and Elsa Morante's "La Storia" Introduction: Becoming Familiar with The Familiar, or, The Imaginary Novel and the Imagination Into the Catsum. Mark Z. Danielewski's Arithmopoetics ‘Questionable + Intelligence’: Inter + Legere
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1