Prevalence and Factors Associated with Postoperative Pain After Cesarean Section at a Comprehensive Specialized Hospital in Northwest Ethiopia: Prospective Observational Study

IF 0.6 Q4 SURGERY Open Access Surgery Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.2147/oas.s347920
Getamesay Demelash, Y. W. Berhe, A. H. Gebregzi, Wubie Birlie Chekol
{"title":"Prevalence and Factors Associated with Postoperative Pain After Cesarean Section at a Comprehensive Specialized Hospital in Northwest Ethiopia: Prospective Observational Study","authors":"Getamesay Demelash, Y. W. Berhe, A. H. Gebregzi, Wubie Birlie Chekol","doi":"10.2147/oas.s347920","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Cesarean section is the commonest obstetric procedure worldwide and pain is the leading compliant during the postoperative period. The objective of this study was to assess the prevalence and factors associated with postoperative pain after cesarean section at a University Hospital in Northwest Ethiopia. Materials and Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted among parturients who underwent cesarean section. After obtaining ethical approval, 299 parturients were approached. The numerical rating scale was used to measure pain severity. The association between variables was determined at 95% CI with binary logistic regression. A p-value <0.05 was considered significant. Results: A total of 290 parturients were included with a response rate of 97%. The overall prevalence of moderate to severe postoperative pain after a cesarean section was 85.5% (95% CI: 81.4–89.0%) within the first 24 postoperative hours. On the multi-variable analysis, preoperative anxiety (AOR: 2.3, 95% CI: 1.1–4.9), history of previous cesarean section (AOR: 2.3, 95% CI: 1.1–5.0), Pfannenstiel incision (AOR: 3.2, 95% CI: 1.3–8.0) and absence of regional analgesia (AOR: 3.7, 95% CI: 1.7–7.9) were significantly associated with moderate to severe postoperative pain after cesarean section. Conclusion: The prevalence of moderate to severe pain in the first postoperative day was unacceptably very high. Parturients who had preoperative anxiety, history of previous cesarean section, Pfannenstiel incisions, and those who did not receive regional analgesia have significantly suffered from postoperative pain. Pain severity needs to be assessed and documented by using pain-rating scales and interdisciplinary pain management should be provided.","PeriodicalId":56363,"journal":{"name":"Open Access Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Access Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/oas.s347920","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background: Cesarean section is the commonest obstetric procedure worldwide and pain is the leading compliant during the postoperative period. The objective of this study was to assess the prevalence and factors associated with postoperative pain after cesarean section at a University Hospital in Northwest Ethiopia. Materials and Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted among parturients who underwent cesarean section. After obtaining ethical approval, 299 parturients were approached. The numerical rating scale was used to measure pain severity. The association between variables was determined at 95% CI with binary logistic regression. A p-value <0.05 was considered significant. Results: A total of 290 parturients were included with a response rate of 97%. The overall prevalence of moderate to severe postoperative pain after a cesarean section was 85.5% (95% CI: 81.4–89.0%) within the first 24 postoperative hours. On the multi-variable analysis, preoperative anxiety (AOR: 2.3, 95% CI: 1.1–4.9), history of previous cesarean section (AOR: 2.3, 95% CI: 1.1–5.0), Pfannenstiel incision (AOR: 3.2, 95% CI: 1.3–8.0) and absence of regional analgesia (AOR: 3.7, 95% CI: 1.7–7.9) were significantly associated with moderate to severe postoperative pain after cesarean section. Conclusion: The prevalence of moderate to severe pain in the first postoperative day was unacceptably very high. Parturients who had preoperative anxiety, history of previous cesarean section, Pfannenstiel incisions, and those who did not receive regional analgesia have significantly suffered from postoperative pain. Pain severity needs to be assessed and documented by using pain-rating scales and interdisciplinary pain management should be provided.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
埃塞俄比亚西北部一家综合性专科医院剖宫产术后疼痛的患病率及相关因素:前瞻性观察研究
背景:剖宫产是世界上最常见的产科手术,疼痛是术后最常见的并发症。本研究的目的是评估埃塞俄比亚西北部一所大学医院剖宫产术后疼痛的发生率和相关因素。材料与方法:对剖宫产产妇进行前瞻性观察研究。在获得伦理批准后,299名产妇接受了治疗。数值评定量表用于测量疼痛的严重程度。采用二元逻辑回归在95%置信区间确定变量之间的相关性。p值<0.05被认为是显著的。结果:共纳入290名产妇,有效率为97%。剖宫产术后24小时内,中度至重度术后疼痛的总发生率为85.5%(95%CI:81.4–89.0%)。在多变量分析中,术前焦虑(AOR:2.3,95%CI:1.1-4.9)、既往剖宫产史(AOR:3.3,95%CI=1.1-5.0)、Pfannenstiel切口(AOR=3.2,95%CI:1.3-8.0)和缺乏局部镇痛(AOR:7.7,95%CI:1.7-7.9)与剖宫产术后中度至重度疼痛显著相关。结论:术后第一天中重度疼痛的发生率非常高,令人无法接受。有术前焦虑、既往剖宫产史、Pfannenstiel切口和未接受局部镇痛的产妇术后疼痛明显。疼痛严重程度需要通过使用疼痛评定量表进行评估和记录,并应提供跨学科的疼痛管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Open Access Surgery is an international, peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that focuses on all aspects of surgical procedures and interventions. Patient care around the peri-operative period and patient outcomes post surgery are key topics for the journal. All grades of surgery from minor cosmetic interventions to major surgical procedures will be covered. Novel techniques and the utilization of new instruments and materials, including implants and prostheses that optimize outcomes constitute major areas of interest. Contributions regarding patient satisfaction, preference, quality of life, and their role in optimizing new surgical procedures will be welcomed. The journal is characterized by the rapid reporting of case reports, clinical studies, reviews and original research.
期刊最新文献
Affinity of Colonic Granular Cell Tumor Within the Right Colon: Case Report and Review of Literature Rare Classic Presentation of Primary Hyperparathyroidism: A Case Report and Literature Review Treatment Outcomes of Non-Traumatic Acute Abdomen and Its Associated Factors in Adult Patients at Tibebe Ghion Specialized Hospital, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia: Cross-Sectional Study Cecal Volvulus in Pregnancy, a Diagnostic Dilemma and Management: A Case Report and Literature Review Appendicitis During Pregnancy: Best Surgical Practices and Clinical Management
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1