Rethinking the security issue in the China-Burma territorial dispute

IF 0.4 2区 历史学 Q1 HISTORY Cold War History Pub Date : 2022-07-27 DOI:10.1080/14682745.2022.2086860
Hongwei Fan, Yizheng Zou
{"title":"Rethinking the security issue in the China-Burma territorial dispute","authors":"Hongwei Fan, Yizheng Zou","doi":"10.1080/14682745.2022.2086860","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article challenges the dominant friendship-oriented scholarship on the China-Burma border in China and revisits the nature of China’s compromise with Burma in the territorial disputes between 1956 and 1960. Multi-archival and multi-lingual primary sources including official archives and memoirs from Burma, China, the United States and the United Kingdom, are extensively used. In particular, Chinese local archives are used for the first time to demonstrate a new picture of the CCP’s decision-making process in formulating policies of territorial compromise with Burma. Beijing was willing to offer concessions to Burma in the border dispute to improve its own national security because of the security vacuum in the China-Burma border region, Burma’s commitments to China, and the area’s critical geopolitical value.","PeriodicalId":46099,"journal":{"name":"Cold War History","volume":"23 1","pages":"45 - 59"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cold War History","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14682745.2022.2086860","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article challenges the dominant friendship-oriented scholarship on the China-Burma border in China and revisits the nature of China’s compromise with Burma in the territorial disputes between 1956 and 1960. Multi-archival and multi-lingual primary sources including official archives and memoirs from Burma, China, the United States and the United Kingdom, are extensively used. In particular, Chinese local archives are used for the first time to demonstrate a new picture of the CCP’s decision-making process in formulating policies of territorial compromise with Burma. Beijing was willing to offer concessions to Burma in the border dispute to improve its own national security because of the security vacuum in the China-Burma border region, Burma’s commitments to China, and the area’s critical geopolitical value.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对中缅领土争端中安全问题的再思考
摘要本文挑战了中国在中缅边界问题上占主导地位的以友谊为导向的学术,并重新审视了中国在1956年至1960年的领土争端中与缅甸妥协的本质。多种档案和多种语言的主要来源,包括缅甸、中国、美国和英国的官方档案和回忆录,被广泛使用。特别是,中国地方档案首次被用来展示中国共产党在制定与缅甸领土妥协政策方面的决策过程。由于中缅边境地区的安全真空、缅甸对中国的承诺以及该地区的关键地缘政治价值,北京愿意在边界争端中向缅甸做出让步,以改善其国家安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cold War History
Cold War History Multiple-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
48
期刊最新文献
‘Tangled times’: Central American refugee perspectives on the long Cold War* The African Student Movement in the Soviet Union during the 1960s: Pan-Africanism and Communism in the Shadow of Nation-States The Atlantic realists: empire and international thought between Germany and the United StatesMatthew Specter, The Atlantic realists: empire and international thought between Germany and the United States (Stanford University Press, 2022), 336 pp. Taking Third World Solidarity with a Pinch of Salt: Socialist Poland’s policies towards 1960s Mali ‘Something that apparently troubles the Cubans significantly’: Jimmy Carter’s attempt to pressure Cuba ‘out of Africa’ through the Non-Aligned Movement, 1977-78
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1