On the safe use of prior densities for Bayesian model selection

IF 4.4 2区 数学 Q1 STATISTICS & PROBABILITY Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews-Computational Statistics Pub Date : 2022-06-10 DOI:10.1002/wics.1595
F. Llorente, Luca Martino, E. Curbelo, J. Lopez-Santiago, D. Delgado
{"title":"On the safe use of prior densities for Bayesian model selection","authors":"F. Llorente, Luca Martino, E. Curbelo, J. Lopez-Santiago, D. Delgado","doi":"10.1002/wics.1595","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The application of Bayesian inference for the purpose of model selection is very popular nowadays. In this framework, models are compared through their marginal likelihoods, or their quotients, called Bayes factors. However, marginal likelihoods depend on the prior choice. For model selection, even diffuse priors can be actually very informative, unlike for the parameter estimation problem. Furthermore, when the prior is improper, the marginal likelihood of the corresponding model is undetermined. In this work, we discuss the issue of prior sensitivity of the marginal likelihood and its role in model selection. We also comment on the use of uninformative priors, which are very common choices in practice. Several practical suggestions are discussed and many possible solutions, proposed in the literature, to design objective priors for model selection are described. Some of them also allow the use of improper priors. The connection between the marginal likelihood approach and the well‐known information criteria is also presented. We describe the main issues and possible solutions by illustrative numerical examples, providing also some related code. One of them involving a real‐world application on exoplanet detection.","PeriodicalId":47779,"journal":{"name":"Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews-Computational Statistics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews-Computational Statistics","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wics.1595","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"STATISTICS & PROBABILITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

The application of Bayesian inference for the purpose of model selection is very popular nowadays. In this framework, models are compared through their marginal likelihoods, or their quotients, called Bayes factors. However, marginal likelihoods depend on the prior choice. For model selection, even diffuse priors can be actually very informative, unlike for the parameter estimation problem. Furthermore, when the prior is improper, the marginal likelihood of the corresponding model is undetermined. In this work, we discuss the issue of prior sensitivity of the marginal likelihood and its role in model selection. We also comment on the use of uninformative priors, which are very common choices in practice. Several practical suggestions are discussed and many possible solutions, proposed in the literature, to design objective priors for model selection are described. Some of them also allow the use of improper priors. The connection between the marginal likelihood approach and the well‐known information criteria is also presented. We describe the main issues and possible solutions by illustrative numerical examples, providing also some related code. One of them involving a real‐world application on exoplanet detection.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
贝叶斯模型选择中先验密度的安全使用
贝叶斯推理在模型选择中的应用在当今非常流行。在这个框架中,模型通过它们的边际可能性或商进行比较,称为贝叶斯因子。然而,边际可能性取决于先前的选择。对于模型选择,与参数估计问题不同,即使是扩散先验实际上也可以提供非常丰富的信息。此外,当先验不合适时,相应模型的边际似然是不确定的。在这项工作中,我们讨论了边际似然的先验敏感性问题及其在模型选择中的作用。我们还评论了无信息先验的使用,这是实践中非常常见的选择。讨论了一些实用的建议,并描述了文献中提出的许多可能的解决方案,以设计用于模型选择的目标先验。其中一些还允许使用不适当的先验。还介绍了边际似然法和众所周知的信息准则之间的联系。我们通过举例说明了主要问题和可能的解决方案,并提供了一些相关的代码。其中一项涉及到系外行星探测的真实应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
期刊最新文献
A spectrum of explainable and interpretable machine learning approaches for genomic studies Functional neuroimaging in the era of Big Data and Open Science: A modern overview Neuroimaging statistical approaches for determining neural correlates of Alzheimer's disease via positron emission tomography imaging Information criteria for model selection Data Integration in Causal Inference.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1