Assessment Indices of Littoral Habitat Condition for Lakes in Maine and New England, USA.

IF 1.1 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q4 LIMNOLOGY Lake and Reservoir Management Pub Date : 2023-07-10 DOI:10.1080/10402381.2023.2207490
Jeremy Deeds, Aria Amirbahman, Kirsten Hugger, Philip R Kaufmann, Leslie J Matthews, Kellie Merrell, Stephen A Norton
{"title":"Assessment Indices of Littoral Habitat Condition for Lakes in Maine and New England, USA.","authors":"Jeremy Deeds, Aria Amirbahman, Kirsten Hugger, Philip R Kaufmann, Leslie J Matthews, Kellie Merrell, Stephen A Norton","doi":"10.1080/10402381.2023.2207490","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Littoral habitat is critical for lake biota but is adversely affected by residential shoreland development through the loss and reduced structural complexity of lakeshore vegetation. There currently exists no assessment methodology for evaluating littoral habitat condition of individual lakes in northeastern US. We addressed this assessment need by creating multi-metric indices of littoral habitat condition that focus on lakeshore residential development as the primary stressor. We did this by using habitat metrics derived primarily from National Lake Assessment (NLA) Physical Habitat (PHAB) survey field observations to create Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) models that assign lakeshore stations into littoral habitat condition categories. Lake PHAB survey data were used from New England NLA surveys as well as state-level surveys completed in Maine, New Hampshire, and Vermont. Prediction success rates in New England models averaged 83%. The Maine LDA models, which used finer scale survey methods, had an average prediction success rate of 89%. We used 95% bootstrapped confidence intervals to make assessment designations of natural (meeting reference quality), diminished (not meeting reference quality), or intermediate (existing between natural and diminished) littoral habitat condition for each lake. Our results show that efficacious single-lake littoral habitat assessments may be completed within the framework of NLA PHAB methodology, but confidence in assessment results, and therefore better-informed management decisions, can be improved with finer-scale observation data.</p>","PeriodicalId":18017,"journal":{"name":"Lake and Reservoir Management","volume":"39 1","pages":"141-155"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10642257/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lake and Reservoir Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10402381.2023.2207490","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LIMNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Littoral habitat is critical for lake biota but is adversely affected by residential shoreland development through the loss and reduced structural complexity of lakeshore vegetation. There currently exists no assessment methodology for evaluating littoral habitat condition of individual lakes in northeastern US. We addressed this assessment need by creating multi-metric indices of littoral habitat condition that focus on lakeshore residential development as the primary stressor. We did this by using habitat metrics derived primarily from National Lake Assessment (NLA) Physical Habitat (PHAB) survey field observations to create Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) models that assign lakeshore stations into littoral habitat condition categories. Lake PHAB survey data were used from New England NLA surveys as well as state-level surveys completed in Maine, New Hampshire, and Vermont. Prediction success rates in New England models averaged 83%. The Maine LDA models, which used finer scale survey methods, had an average prediction success rate of 89%. We used 95% bootstrapped confidence intervals to make assessment designations of natural (meeting reference quality), diminished (not meeting reference quality), or intermediate (existing between natural and diminished) littoral habitat condition for each lake. Our results show that efficacious single-lake littoral habitat assessments may be completed within the framework of NLA PHAB methodology, but confidence in assessment results, and therefore better-informed management decisions, can be improved with finer-scale observation data.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国缅因州和新英格兰地区湖泊沿岸生境状况评价指标
[摘要]Deeds J, Amirbahman A, Hugger K, Kaufmann PR, Matthews LJ, Merrell K, Norton SA。2023. 美国缅因州和新英格兰地区湖泊沿岸生境状况评价指标。湖泊保护区管理。39:141-155。沿海生境对湖泊生物群落至关重要,但由于湖滨植被的丧失和结构复杂性的降低,沿海生境受到了不利的影响。目前还没有评估美国东北部单个湖泊沿岸生境状况的评估方法。为了满足这一评估需求,我们创建了沿海栖息地条件的多度量指标,重点关注湖滨住宅开发作为主要压力源。为此,我们利用主要来自国家湖泊评估(NLA)物理生境(PHAB)调查现场观测的生境指标,建立线性判别分析(LDA)模型,将湖岸站划分为沿海生境条件类别。湖泊PHAB调查数据来自新英格兰NLA调查,以及缅因州、新罕布什尔州和佛蒙特州完成的州级调查。新英格兰模型的预测成功率平均为83%。缅因州LDA模型使用更精细的调查方法,平均预测成功率为89%。我们使用95%的自举置信区间对每个湖泊进行自然(满足参考质量)、退化(不满足参考质量)或中间(存在于自然和退化之间)沿海生境条件的评估指定。我们的研究结果表明,有效的单湖沿岸生境评估可以在NLA PHAB方法的框架内完成,但更精细的观测数据可以提高对评估结果的信心,从而更好地了解管理决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Lake and Reservoir Management
Lake and Reservoir Management 环境科学-海洋与淡水生物学
自引率
6.70%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: Lake and Reservoir Management (LRM) publishes original, previously unpublished studies relevant to lake and reservoir management. Papers address the management of lakes and reservoirs, their watersheds and tributaries, along with the limnology and ecology needed for sound management of these systems. Case studies that advance the science of lake management or confirm important management concepts are appropriate as long as there is clearly described management significance. Papers on economic, social, regulatory and policy aspects of lake management are also welcome with appropriate supporting data and management implications. Literature syntheses and papers developing a conceptual foundation of lake and watershed ecology will be considered for publication, but there needs to be clear emphasis on management implications. Modeling papers will be considered where the model is properly verified but it is also highly preferable that management based on the model has been taken and results have been documented. Application of known models to yet another system without a clear advance in resultant management are unlikely to be accepted. Shorter notes that convey important early results of long-term studies or provide data relating to causative agents or management approaches that warrant further study are acceptable even if the story is not yet complete. All submissions are subject to peer review to assure relevance and reliability for management application.
期刊最新文献
Spatial-temporal shifts in submersed aquatic vegetation community structure resulting from a selective herbicide treatment in Lake Sampson, Florida, USA Relative energy and perceived impact of vessel-generated waves in fetch-limited environments Watershed grassland fires drive nutrient increases in replicated experimental ponds Reservoir siltation and sediment characterization for reuse as construction material in a semi-arid area Assessing the efficacy of spring stocking of pikeperch (Sander lucioperca) into a eutrophic reservoir
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1