Editorial: Climate strikes to Extinction Rebellion: environmental activism shaping our future

IF 3 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Journal of Human Rights and the Environment Pub Date : 2020-12-01 DOI:10.4337/JHRE.2020.03.00
B. Richardson
{"title":"Editorial: Climate strikes to Extinction Rebellion: environmental activism shaping our future","authors":"B. Richardson","doi":"10.4337/JHRE.2020.03.00","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Covid-19 has dominated global news in 2020, but even the pandemic has not stymied a new generation of activists mobilizing for action on interconnected grievances of climate breakdown, economic inequality and social injustice. Numerous countries have experienced the mass mobilizations of Extinction Rebellion (XR), the youth-led climate strikes associated with Greta Thunberg and the Black Lives Matter (BLM) rallies, as well as localized protests such as Indigenous First Nations blockading oil pipelines and railways on their traditional territories. With electoral politics struggling to generate the ambitious laws urgently needed to avert irreparable environmental breakdown, many have turned to protest. Protest mobilizations embrace diverse grievances, goals and strategies, and indeed some may seem to be highly reactionary, such as France’s Yellow Vests movement (Mouvement des gilets jaunes) sparked by higher fuel taxes to combat carbon emissions. The contemporary protests however share some intersecting points of interest for scholars researching the influence of civil disobedience, the roles of grassroots activists challenging state or corporate elites, the policing of protesters’ space and voice, the breakdown in the legitimacy of the nation-state and the increasing invocation of emergency powers in unsettled times. Environment-related protest of course is not new, and draws sustenance from a long tradition of grassroots activism including the Occupy movement, the anti-globalization and anti-nuclear movements, and earlier civil disobedience campaigns associated with black civil rights and the Suffragettes. The recent social upheavals – the subject of this special issue of the Journal of Human Rights and the Environment – involve some shifts away from these precedents, shifts including the rise of a rhetoric of a climate or planetary ‘emergency’; the emergence of new political actors, notably children; and the deployment of distinctive tactics such as the hyper-aesthetic character of some protests, as is evident in XR’s street performances and paraphernalia. Concurrently, some governments have recently introduced unprecedented measures to thwart environmental activism, including anti-protest laws that criminalize some forms of activism. The modern era of environmental law, dating from about the 1960s, has brought many benefits, such as cleaner air and water, greater due diligence on proposed developments, and larger protected areas networks. Many of these laws have also enhanced opportunities for public participation in decision making and access to justice, thereby","PeriodicalId":43831,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Human Rights and the Environment","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Human Rights and the Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4337/JHRE.2020.03.00","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Covid-19 has dominated global news in 2020, but even the pandemic has not stymied a new generation of activists mobilizing for action on interconnected grievances of climate breakdown, economic inequality and social injustice. Numerous countries have experienced the mass mobilizations of Extinction Rebellion (XR), the youth-led climate strikes associated with Greta Thunberg and the Black Lives Matter (BLM) rallies, as well as localized protests such as Indigenous First Nations blockading oil pipelines and railways on their traditional territories. With electoral politics struggling to generate the ambitious laws urgently needed to avert irreparable environmental breakdown, many have turned to protest. Protest mobilizations embrace diverse grievances, goals and strategies, and indeed some may seem to be highly reactionary, such as France’s Yellow Vests movement (Mouvement des gilets jaunes) sparked by higher fuel taxes to combat carbon emissions. The contemporary protests however share some intersecting points of interest for scholars researching the influence of civil disobedience, the roles of grassroots activists challenging state or corporate elites, the policing of protesters’ space and voice, the breakdown in the legitimacy of the nation-state and the increasing invocation of emergency powers in unsettled times. Environment-related protest of course is not new, and draws sustenance from a long tradition of grassroots activism including the Occupy movement, the anti-globalization and anti-nuclear movements, and earlier civil disobedience campaigns associated with black civil rights and the Suffragettes. The recent social upheavals – the subject of this special issue of the Journal of Human Rights and the Environment – involve some shifts away from these precedents, shifts including the rise of a rhetoric of a climate or planetary ‘emergency’; the emergence of new political actors, notably children; and the deployment of distinctive tactics such as the hyper-aesthetic character of some protests, as is evident in XR’s street performances and paraphernalia. Concurrently, some governments have recently introduced unprecedented measures to thwart environmental activism, including anti-protest laws that criminalize some forms of activism. The modern era of environmental law, dating from about the 1960s, has brought many benefits, such as cleaner air and water, greater due diligence on proposed developments, and larger protected areas networks. Many of these laws have also enhanced opportunities for public participation in decision making and access to justice, thereby
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社论:气候罢工到灭绝叛乱:环境行动主义塑造我们的未来
2019冠状病毒病占据了2020年的全球新闻,但即使是大流行也没有阻止新一代活动家动员起来,针对气候崩溃、经济不平等和社会不公正等相互关联的不满采取行动。许多国家都经历过“灭绝叛乱”(XR)的大规模动员,与格蕾塔·滕伯格(Greta Thunberg)和“黑人的命也是命”(BLM)集会相关的青年领导的气候罢工,以及土著第一民族(Indigenous First Nations)在其传统领土上封锁石油管道和铁路等局部抗议活动。为了避免不可挽回的环境破坏,迫切需要出台雄心勃勃的法律,在选举政治努力推动的情况下,许多人转向了抗议。抗议动员包含了各种各样的不满、目标和策略,实际上有些似乎是高度反动的,比如法国的黄背心运动(运动des gilets jaunes),它是由提高燃油税以对抗碳排放引发的。然而,当代的抗议活动有一些共同的兴趣点,学者们研究公民不服从的影响,基层活动家挑战国家或企业精英的角色,抗议者空间和声音的监管,民族国家合法性的崩溃以及在动荡时期越来越多地调用紧急权力。当然,与环境有关的抗议活动并不新鲜,它从草根运动的悠久传统中汲取了支持,包括占领运动、反全球化和反核运动,以及早期与黑人民权和妇女参政论者有关的公民不服从运动。最近的社会动荡——本期《人权与环境杂志》特刊的主题——涉及一些背离这些先例的转变,包括气候或地球“紧急状态”言论的兴起;新的政治参与者的出现,尤其是儿童;以及采用独特的策略,比如一些抗议活动的超审美特征,这在XR的街头表演和随身用品中很明显。与此同时,一些政府最近采取了前所未有的措施来挫败环境行动主义,包括将某些形式的行动主义定为犯罪的反抗议法。大约从20世纪60年代开始的现代环境法时代带来了许多好处,比如更清洁的空气和水,对拟议的开发项目进行更严格的尽职调查,以及更大的保护区网络。其中许多法律还增加了公众参与决策和诉诸司法的机会
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
期刊介绍: The relationship between human rights and the environment is fascinating, uneasy and increasingly urgent. This international journal provides a strategic academic forum for an extended interdisciplinary and multi-layered conversation that explores emergent possibilities, existing tensions, and multiple implications of entanglements between human and non-human forms of liveliness. We invite critical engagements on these themes, especially as refracted through human rights and environmental law, politics, policy-making and community level activisms.
期刊最新文献
The seabed and the South: from stock stories to new histories of international lawmaking Reimagining climate equity to incorporate the non-human Paradise lost? The red right hand of green technology Expanding NGOs’ standing: climate justice through access to the European Court of Human Rights Book review: Sumudu A Atapattu, Carmen G Gonzalez and Sara L Seck (eds), The Cambridge Handbook of Environmental Justice and Sustainable Development (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2021) 476 pp.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1