{"title":"Adherence to Pelvic Floor Physical Therapy Referrals in Women With Fecal Incontinence","authors":"J. H. Ross, A. Sinha, K. Propst, C. Ferrando","doi":"10.1097/SPV.0000000000001140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives This study aimed to determine the incidence of patient adherence with prescribed pelvic floor physical therapy (PFPT) in women presenting with fecal incontinence (FI) and to describe patient characteristics associated with nonadherence. Methods This is a retrospective cohort study of women presenting with FI who were prescribed PFPT between January 2010 and December 2019. Adherence with PFPT was defined as either completion of documented recommended physical therapy sessions or discharge from therapy by the therapist before completion of the prescribed sessions. Results Complete data were available for 248 patients. A total of 159 (64.1%) patients attended at least 1 session of PFPT. Patients who did not attend any sessions were more likely to have a concurrent diagnosis of pelvic organ prolapse (69.7% vs 55.3%, P = 0.03). When controlled for confounding variables, concurrent prolapse remained associated with nonattendance (adjusted odds ratio of 1.9 [95% confidence interval, 1.0–3.3]). Of the patients who attended PFPT, the adherence rate was 32.7% (n = 50), whereas the rate was 20% for the total cohort. Nonadherent patients were more likely to have a higher body mass index (28.9 vs 26.9, P = 0.02), but this was no longer statistically significant once other patient characteristics were controlled for. Of the entire cohort, 136 (54.8%) followed up with their physicians after the initial referral to PFPT. Of the 59 patients, 43.7% were offered second-line therapy. Conclusion Of the women prescribed PFPT for a diagnosis of FI, approximately two thirds attended at least a single session, but only one third of those patients were adherent with the recommended therapy.","PeriodicalId":48831,"journal":{"name":"Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery","volume":"28 1","pages":"e29 - e33"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000001140","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Objectives This study aimed to determine the incidence of patient adherence with prescribed pelvic floor physical therapy (PFPT) in women presenting with fecal incontinence (FI) and to describe patient characteristics associated with nonadherence. Methods This is a retrospective cohort study of women presenting with FI who were prescribed PFPT between January 2010 and December 2019. Adherence with PFPT was defined as either completion of documented recommended physical therapy sessions or discharge from therapy by the therapist before completion of the prescribed sessions. Results Complete data were available for 248 patients. A total of 159 (64.1%) patients attended at least 1 session of PFPT. Patients who did not attend any sessions were more likely to have a concurrent diagnosis of pelvic organ prolapse (69.7% vs 55.3%, P = 0.03). When controlled for confounding variables, concurrent prolapse remained associated with nonattendance (adjusted odds ratio of 1.9 [95% confidence interval, 1.0–3.3]). Of the patients who attended PFPT, the adherence rate was 32.7% (n = 50), whereas the rate was 20% for the total cohort. Nonadherent patients were more likely to have a higher body mass index (28.9 vs 26.9, P = 0.02), but this was no longer statistically significant once other patient characteristics were controlled for. Of the entire cohort, 136 (54.8%) followed up with their physicians after the initial referral to PFPT. Of the 59 patients, 43.7% were offered second-line therapy. Conclusion Of the women prescribed PFPT for a diagnosis of FI, approximately two thirds attended at least a single session, but only one third of those patients were adherent with the recommended therapy.
目的:本研究旨在确定患有大便失禁(FI)的女性患者坚持盆底物理治疗(PFPT)的发生率,并描述与不坚持相关的患者特征。方法:这是一项回顾性队列研究,研究对象是2010年1月至2019年12月期间接受PFPT治疗的FI女性。坚持PFPT的定义是完成记录推荐的物理治疗课程或在完成规定课程之前由治疗师退出治疗。结果248例患者资料完整。共有159例(64.1%)患者参加了至少1次PFPT治疗。未参加任何疗程的患者更有可能同时诊断盆腔器官脱垂(69.7% vs 55.3%, P = 0.03)。在控制混杂变量后,并发脱垂仍与缺勤相关(校正优势比为1.9[95%置信区间,1.0-3.3])。在参加PFPT的患者中,依从率为32.7% (n = 50),而在整个队列中,依从率为20%。非依从性患者更可能有较高的体重指数(28.9 vs 26.9, P = 0.02),但一旦控制了其他患者特征,这就不再具有统计学意义。在整个队列中,136人(54.8%)在首次转诊到PFPT后与他们的医生进行了随访。在59例患者中,43.7%的患者接受了二线治疗。结论:在诊断为FI的妇女中,大约三分之二的人至少参加了一次治疗,但只有三分之一的患者坚持推荐的治疗。
期刊介绍:
Female Pelvic Medicine & Reconstructive Surgery, official journal of the American Urogynecologic Society, is a peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary journal dedicated to specialists, physicians and allied health professionals concerned with prevention, diagnosis and treatment of female pelvic floor disorders. The journal publishes original clinical research, basic science research, education, scientific advances, case reports, scientific reviews, editorials and letters to the editor.