De facto differentiated disintegration in the European Union. The case of Poland

IF 2.2 1区 社会学 Q1 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Journal of European Integration Pub Date : 2023-05-11 DOI:10.1080/07036337.2023.2212122
Agnieszka K. Cianciara
{"title":"De facto differentiated disintegration in the European Union. The case of Poland","authors":"Agnieszka K. Cianciara","doi":"10.1080/07036337.2023.2212122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article seeks to shed light on the evolution of demand for differentiation in Poland. First, it argues that since EU accession Poland has moved from instrumental towards quasi-constitutional differentiated integration, and towards differentiated disintegration de facto. Second, it conceptualizes non-compliance in the rule of law area as a manifestation of differentiated disintegration de facto understood as polity-related deliberate and enduring circumvention of EU legal framework. Third, it argues that this mode of de facto differentiation constitutes a challenger strategy of Poland’s populists in power aimed at undermining the foundations of the European polity. Accordingly, the Polish case provides an illustration of ‘post-functionalism reversed’: it is not a Eurosceptic public that constrains a pro-integrationist government, but a Eurosceptic government that drives differentiation and disintegration without explicit support from the largely pro-integrationist public.","PeriodicalId":47516,"journal":{"name":"Journal of European Integration","volume":"45 1","pages":"911 - 926"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of European Integration","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2023.2212122","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article seeks to shed light on the evolution of demand for differentiation in Poland. First, it argues that since EU accession Poland has moved from instrumental towards quasi-constitutional differentiated integration, and towards differentiated disintegration de facto. Second, it conceptualizes non-compliance in the rule of law area as a manifestation of differentiated disintegration de facto understood as polity-related deliberate and enduring circumvention of EU legal framework. Third, it argues that this mode of de facto differentiation constitutes a challenger strategy of Poland’s populists in power aimed at undermining the foundations of the European polity. Accordingly, the Polish case provides an illustration of ‘post-functionalism reversed’: it is not a Eurosceptic public that constrains a pro-integrationist government, but a Eurosceptic government that drives differentiation and disintegration without explicit support from the largely pro-integrationist public.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
欧盟事实上的分化解体。波兰的例子
摘要本文旨在阐明波兰差异化需求的演变。首先,它认为,自加入欧盟以来,波兰已从工具性走向准宪法的差异化一体化,并在事实上走向差异化解体。其次,它将法治领域的不遵守行为概念化为有区别的解体的表现,事实上被理解为与政治有关的蓄意和持久规避欧盟法律框架。第三,它认为这种事实上的分化模式构成了波兰执政民粹主义者的挑战者战略,旨在破坏欧洲政治的基础。因此,波兰的案例提供了一个“后功能主义逆转”的例子:约束支持一体化的政府的不是疑欧派公众,而是在没有得到主要支持一体化的公众明确支持的情况下推动分化和解体的疑欧派政府。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
6.90%
发文量
52
期刊最新文献
External shocks, policy spillovers, and veto players: (post)exceptionalist common agricultural policy and the case of the 2023-2027 reform The Roma and the double-movement of Social Europe Democracy and European Union: beyond the dichotomy The quiet politics of migration supranationalization – Commission entrepreneurship and the intra-Corporate Transferee Directive The COVID-19 pandemic and institutional change in the EU’s financial assistance regime: the governance of the Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1