Optical and motor changes associated with lighting and near vision tasks in electronic devices.

IF 1.3 4区 心理学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY Journal of Eye Movement Research Pub Date : 2023-05-01 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.16910/jemr.16.2.3
Elvira Orduna-Hospital, Ebrahim Safarian Baloujeh, Rafael Navarro, Ana Sanchez-Cano
{"title":"Optical and motor changes associated with lighting and near vision tasks in electronic devices.","authors":"Elvira Orduna-Hospital, Ebrahim Safarian Baloujeh, Rafael Navarro, Ana Sanchez-Cano","doi":"10.16910/jemr.16.2.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> To assess optical and motor changes associated with near vision reading under different controlled lighting conditions performed with two different types of electronic screens. <b>Methods:</b> Twenty-four healthy subjects with a mean age of 22.9±2.3 years (18- 33) participated in this study. An iPad and an e-ink reader were chosen to present calibrated text, and each task lasted 5 minutes evaluating both ambient illuminance level and luminance of the screens. <b>Results:</b> Eye-tracker data revealed a higher number of saccadic eye movements under minimum luminance than under maximum luminance. The results showed statistically significant differences between the iPad (p=0.016) and the e-ink reader (p=0.002). The length of saccades was also higher for the minimum luminance level for both devices: 6.2±2.8 mm and 8.2±4.2 mm (e-ink max vs min), 6.8±2.9 mm and 7.6±3.6 mm (iPad max vs min), and blinking rate increased significantly for lower lighting conditions. <b>Conclusions:</b> Performing reading tasks on electronic devices is highly influenced by both the configuration of the screens and the ambient lighting, meanwhile, low differences in visual quality that are transient in healthy young people, were found.</p>","PeriodicalId":15813,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Eye Movement Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10684330/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Eye Movement Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.16910/jemr.16.2.3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose: To assess optical and motor changes associated with near vision reading under different controlled lighting conditions performed with two different types of electronic screens. Methods: Twenty-four healthy subjects with a mean age of 22.9±2.3 years (18- 33) participated in this study. An iPad and an e-ink reader were chosen to present calibrated text, and each task lasted 5 minutes evaluating both ambient illuminance level and luminance of the screens. Results: Eye-tracker data revealed a higher number of saccadic eye movements under minimum luminance than under maximum luminance. The results showed statistically significant differences between the iPad (p=0.016) and the e-ink reader (p=0.002). The length of saccades was also higher for the minimum luminance level for both devices: 6.2±2.8 mm and 8.2±4.2 mm (e-ink max vs min), 6.8±2.9 mm and 7.6±3.6 mm (iPad max vs min), and blinking rate increased significantly for lower lighting conditions. Conclusions: Performing reading tasks on electronic devices is highly influenced by both the configuration of the screens and the ambient lighting, meanwhile, low differences in visual quality that are transient in healthy young people, were found.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与电子设备中的照明和近视任务相关的光学和运动变化
目的:评估在两种不同类型的电子屏幕上进行的不同控制照明条件下,与近视阅读相关的光学和运动变化。方法:24名健康受试者参加本研究,平均年龄22.9±2.3岁(18-33岁)。选择一台iPad和一台电子墨水阅读器来呈现校准后的文本,每项任务持续5分钟,评估环境照度水平和屏幕亮度。结果:眼动追踪数据显示,在最小亮度下,扫视眼球的次数高于在最大亮度下。结果显示,iPad(p=0.016)和电子墨水阅读器(p=0.002)之间存在统计学上的显著差异。两种设备的最小亮度水平下,扫视的长度也更高:6.2±2.8 mm和8.2±4.2 mm(电子墨水最大值与最小值),6.8±2.9 mm和7.6±3.6 mm(iPad最大值与最低值),在较低的照明条件下,眨眼率显著增加。结论:在电子设备上执行阅读任务在很大程度上受到屏幕配置和环境照明的影响,同时,健康年轻人的视觉质量差异很小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
33.30%
发文量
10
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Eye Movement Research is an open-access, peer-reviewed scientific periodical devoted to all aspects of oculomotor functioning including methodology of eye recording, neurophysiological and cognitive models, attention, reading, as well as applications in neurology, ergonomy, media research and other areas,
期刊最新文献
The level of skills involved in an observation-based gait analysis. Persistence of primitive reflexes associated with asymmetries in fixation and ocular motility values. Influence of complexity and Gestalt principles on aesthetic preferences for building façades: An eye tracking study Classification framework to identify similar visual scan paths using multiple similarity metrics Gender selection dilemma in FMCG advertising: Insights from eye-tracking research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1