Education hubs and private higher education expansion in small island developing states contexts: The case of Mauritius

Q3 Social Sciences Transformation in Higher Education Pub Date : 2018-10-16 DOI:10.4102/THE.V3I0.46
H. Mariaye, M. Samuel
{"title":"Education hubs and private higher education expansion in small island developing states contexts: The case of Mauritius","authors":"H. Mariaye, M. Samuel","doi":"10.4102/THE.V3I0.46","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background:  This article is located in the context of governments of small island developing states supporting education hubs in collaboration with local and global partners. Whilst current literature on the development of education hubs focuses on the macro policy perspectives looking at how education hub policies are designed and enacted upon at national level, there are relatively few studies on the micro perspective of the institutions. Aim:  By comparing the agendas, experiences, potential and drawbacks of these institutions, the article explores the sustainability prospects of these variants of education hubs. Methods:  We selected three case studies: a public distance education university, a local private university and an international branch university within the same broader environmental context to examine how a ‘vision of possibilities’ is played out within three different institutional agendas. Results:  The case studies reveal that marketisation and privatisation marginalise the pursuit of quality which recedes in preference for securing international economic resources to activate the local developmental agendas and how the exercise privileges skewed power relations which maintain centre–periphery hegemonic hierarchies in the cross-border collaborations. Conclusion:  The uptake of an education hub as a national target exemplifies how the uncritical and indiscriminate borrowing of policies normalises and is reframed to appear as ‘moments of equity’. But in reality it promotes individual competitiveness at the expense of the common good.","PeriodicalId":32132,"journal":{"name":"Transformation in Higher Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4102/THE.V3I0.46","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transformation in Higher Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/THE.V3I0.46","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Background:  This article is located in the context of governments of small island developing states supporting education hubs in collaboration with local and global partners. Whilst current literature on the development of education hubs focuses on the macro policy perspectives looking at how education hub policies are designed and enacted upon at national level, there are relatively few studies on the micro perspective of the institutions. Aim:  By comparing the agendas, experiences, potential and drawbacks of these institutions, the article explores the sustainability prospects of these variants of education hubs. Methods:  We selected three case studies: a public distance education university, a local private university and an international branch university within the same broader environmental context to examine how a ‘vision of possibilities’ is played out within three different institutional agendas. Results:  The case studies reveal that marketisation and privatisation marginalise the pursuit of quality which recedes in preference for securing international economic resources to activate the local developmental agendas and how the exercise privileges skewed power relations which maintain centre–periphery hegemonic hierarchies in the cross-border collaborations. Conclusion:  The uptake of an education hub as a national target exemplifies how the uncritical and indiscriminate borrowing of policies normalises and is reframed to appear as ‘moments of equity’. But in reality it promotes individual competitiveness at the expense of the common good.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
小岛屿发展中国家的教育中心和私立高等教育扩展:以毛里求斯为例
背景:本文的背景是小岛屿发展中国家政府与当地和全球合作伙伴合作支持教育中心。虽然目前关于教育中心发展的文献侧重于宏观政策视角,研究如何在国家层面上设计和实施教育中心政策,但对机构微观视角的研究相对较少。目的:通过比较这些机构的议程、经验、潜力和缺点,探讨这些变体教育中心的可持续性前景。方法:我们选择了三个案例研究:一所公立远程教育大学,一所当地私立大学和一所国际分校,在相同的更广泛的环境背景下,研究“可能性愿景”如何在三种不同的机构议程中发挥作用。结果:案例研究表明,市场化和私有化边缘化了对质量的追求,而质量的追求更倾向于获得国际经济资源,以激活当地的发展议程,以及行使特权如何扭曲权力关系,从而在跨境合作中维持中心-边缘霸权等级制度。结论:将教育中心作为国家目标,说明了不加批判和不加区分地借用政策是如何正常化的,并被重新定义为“公平时刻”。但在现实中,它以牺牲公共利益为代价促进了个人竞争力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Transformation in Higher Education
Transformation in Higher Education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Decoding South African lecturers’ frustrations with neoliberal governance approaches Pedagogical relations as a decolonisation tool in African higher education: Reflection on the ethics of care, respect, and trust An evaluation of venue capacity constraints on teaching and learning in higher education Challenges of transforming curricula: Reflections by an interdisciplinary Community of Practice The interplay between strategic drivers and neoliberalism in South African higher education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1