Pitfalls and Opportunities in the Execution of Quality by Design in Analytical Sciences

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Current Pharmaceutical Analysis Pub Date : 2023-05-17 DOI:10.2174/1573412919666230517141015
S. Chopra, Prashant K. Chaturvedi, Kalyani H. Joshi, S. Tauro, Pintu B. Prajapati
{"title":"Pitfalls and Opportunities in the Execution of Quality by Design in Analytical\nSciences","authors":"S. Chopra, Prashant K. Chaturvedi, Kalyani H. Joshi, S. Tauro, Pintu B. Prajapati","doi":"10.2174/1573412919666230517141015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nQuality by Design (QbD) is a systematic approach integrated with quality risk management.\nIt uses different design approaches followed by statistical analysis to yield a quality\nproduct. Now, the pharmaceutical industries are intrested in the application of QbD principles to\nanalytical methods and term it as Analytical QbD (AQbD), which does not essentially mean less\nanalytical testing; to a particular extent, it means the right analysis at the right time, supported by\nscience and risk evaluation which ensures that the analytical method can be improved throughout\nits life cycle. However, for that, the analyst must have sound knowledge of Analytical Target Profile\n(ATP), method performance characteristics, risk assessment, choice of Design of Experiment\n(DoE), optimization of Method Operable Design Region (MODR). Some papers have cited the\nimportance, regulatory flexibility, theoretical aspects, and statistical analysis of AQbD, but only a\nfew discuss the core issue of gradual implementation of QbD in analytical sciences. For seamless\ntransition, researchers need clarification on AQbD terminologies, acceptable methods, criteria to\nembrace critical quality attributes (CQAs), and standards to judge the adequacy of controls. This\npaper summarizes the challenges and solutions for the implementation of AQbD.\n","PeriodicalId":10889,"journal":{"name":"Current Pharmaceutical Analysis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Pharmaceutical Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1573412919666230517141015","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Quality by Design (QbD) is a systematic approach integrated with quality risk management. It uses different design approaches followed by statistical analysis to yield a quality product. Now, the pharmaceutical industries are intrested in the application of QbD principles to analytical methods and term it as Analytical QbD (AQbD), which does not essentially mean less analytical testing; to a particular extent, it means the right analysis at the right time, supported by science and risk evaluation which ensures that the analytical method can be improved throughout its life cycle. However, for that, the analyst must have sound knowledge of Analytical Target Profile (ATP), method performance characteristics, risk assessment, choice of Design of Experiment (DoE), optimization of Method Operable Design Region (MODR). Some papers have cited the importance, regulatory flexibility, theoretical aspects, and statistical analysis of AQbD, but only a few discuss the core issue of gradual implementation of QbD in analytical sciences. For seamless transition, researchers need clarification on AQbD terminologies, acceptable methods, criteria to embrace critical quality attributes (CQAs), and standards to judge the adequacy of controls. This paper summarizes the challenges and solutions for the implementation of AQbD.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
分析科学实施设计质量的陷阱与机遇
设计质量(QbD)是一种与质量风险管理相结合的系统方法。它使用不同的设计方法,然后进行统计分析,以产生高质量的产品。现在,制药行业热衷于将QbD原理应用于分析方法,并将其称为分析QbD(AQbD),这本质上并不意味着更少的分析测试;在某种程度上,它意味着在正确的时间进行正确的分析,并得到科学和风险评估的支持,从而确保分析方法在整个生命周期内都能得到改进。然而,为此,分析员必须对分析目标剖面(ATP)、方法性能特征、风险评估、实验设计(DoE)的选择、方法可操作设计区域(MODR)的优化有充分的了解。一些论文引用了AQbD的重要性、监管灵活性、理论方面和统计分析,但仅讨论了在分析科学中逐步实施QbD的核心问题。对于无缝过渡,研究人员需要澄清AQbD术语、可接受的方法、反映关键质量属性(CQA)的标准以及判断控制是否充分的标准。本文总结了AQbD实施面临的挑战和解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
85
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Aims & Scope Current Pharmaceutical Analysis publishes expert reviews and original research articles on all the most recent advances in pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis. All aspects of the field are represented including drug analysis, analytical methodology and instrumentation. The journal is essential to all involved in pharmaceutical, biochemical and clinical analysis.
期刊最新文献
Simultaneous Estimation of Pregabalin and Duloxetine Used to Treat Nerve Pain by Stability Indicating RP-HPLC Method Using the QBD Approach Research on Compatibility of Packaging Materials of High-Risk Cephalosporin Powder Injection and Establishment of Indicator Component Evaluation Method Universally Applicable Methods for Comprehensive Risk Assessment of Elemental Impurities in Vitamin A and D Preparations An Overview of Biotechnological Drug’s Various Techniques of Downstream Process, Guideline’s And Different Chromatographic Analysis Validation of GF-AAS Method for the Determination of Aluminium Content in Human Albumin Finished Product
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1