Comparison between the Effect of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy and Laparoscopic Mini-gastric Bypass on Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Obese Patients: A Prospective Study

Mohamed Elkerkary, H. Shaban, O. Adly, Mohamed KE Elhadary, Mohammad Farouk
{"title":"Comparison between the Effect of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy and Laparoscopic Mini-gastric Bypass on Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Obese Patients: A Prospective Study","authors":"Mohamed Elkerkary, H. Shaban, O. Adly, Mohamed KE Elhadary, Mohammad Farouk","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10033-1448","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: One of the major global health burdens is type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) has recently been shown to be effective and safe for T2DM management. Laparoscopic mini-gastric bypass (LMGB) was introduced as a simple (one anastomosis) operation combining both restrictive and malabsorptive functions thus suitable for obese patients with metabolic derangements like T2DM. This study aims to compare the effect of LSG and LMGB on T2DM in obese patients. Materials and methods: A cohort study was carried out on obese patients with T2DM submitted for LSG or LMGB in the department of surgery at Suez Canal university hospital and Suez Canal authority hospital, Egypt, from June 2018 to September 2020. The patients were followed up for 12 months. Results: A total of 20 patients were allocated to each group. The change in the mean body mass index (BMI) was significantly higher in the LSG, compared to the LMGB group ( p < 0.05). Both groups exhibited a significant reduction in the HbA1c at the end of follow-up 12 months after surgery; however, the reduction was significantly higher in the LMGB group ( p < 0.05).Among the LSG group, 75 % of the cases showed complete diabetic remission, 15 % showed partial remission, and 10 % showed improvement in their glycemic control at the end of follow-up. Among the LMGB group, 85 % of the cases showed complete diabetic remission and 10 % showed partial remission. The difference between the study groups was statistically significant. Conclusion: The study showed good improvement for T2DM and a great response in losing weight with a significant superiority of LMGB over the LSG.","PeriodicalId":38741,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10033-1448","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: One of the major global health burdens is type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) has recently been shown to be effective and safe for T2DM management. Laparoscopic mini-gastric bypass (LMGB) was introduced as a simple (one anastomosis) operation combining both restrictive and malabsorptive functions thus suitable for obese patients with metabolic derangements like T2DM. This study aims to compare the effect of LSG and LMGB on T2DM in obese patients. Materials and methods: A cohort study was carried out on obese patients with T2DM submitted for LSG or LMGB in the department of surgery at Suez Canal university hospital and Suez Canal authority hospital, Egypt, from June 2018 to September 2020. The patients were followed up for 12 months. Results: A total of 20 patients were allocated to each group. The change in the mean body mass index (BMI) was significantly higher in the LSG, compared to the LMGB group ( p < 0.05). Both groups exhibited a significant reduction in the HbA1c at the end of follow-up 12 months after surgery; however, the reduction was significantly higher in the LMGB group ( p < 0.05).Among the LSG group, 75 % of the cases showed complete diabetic remission, 15 % showed partial remission, and 10 % showed improvement in their glycemic control at the end of follow-up. Among the LMGB group, 85 % of the cases showed complete diabetic remission and 10 % showed partial remission. The difference between the study groups was statistically significant. Conclusion: The study showed good improvement for T2DM and a great response in losing weight with a significant superiority of LMGB over the LSG.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
腹腔镜袖珍胃切除术与腹腔镜小型胃旁路术治疗肥胖2型糖尿病的前瞻性研究
背景:2型糖尿病(T2DM)是全球主要的健康负担之一。腹腔镜袖胃切除术(LSG)最近被证明是有效和安全的T2DM治疗。腹腔镜微型胃旁路手术(LMGB)是一种简单的(一次吻合)手术,同时具有限制和吸收不良的功能,适用于T2DM等代谢紊乱的肥胖患者。本研究旨在比较LSG和LMGB对肥胖患者T2DM的影响。材料与方法:对2018年6月至2020年9月在埃及苏伊士运河大学医院和苏伊士运河管理局医院外科接受LSG或LMGB治疗的肥胖T2DM患者进行队列研究。随访12个月。结果:每组共20例患者。LSG组的平均体重指数(BMI)变化明显高于LMGB组(p < 0.05)。在术后12个月随访结束时,两组患者的HbA1c均显著降低;而LMGB组降低率显著高于对照组(p < 0.05)。在LSG组中,75%的病例在随访结束时显示糖尿病完全缓解,15%显示部分缓解,10%显示血糖控制改善。在LMGB组中,85%的病例显示糖尿病完全缓解,10%显示部分缓解。研究组之间的差异具有统计学意义。结论:本研究显示T2DM改善良好,减肥效果显著,且LMGB明显优于LSG。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Surgical Aspects of the Possover LION Procedure: An Emerging Procedure for Recovery of Visceral Functions and Locomotion in Paraplegics Avoiding the Falciform Ligament Sign during the Intraoperative Cholangiogram A Study on Effects of Leaking Carbon Dioxide Gas on Surgeons during Laparoscopic Surgeries Comparison between Laparoscopic Ultrasound and Intraoperative Cholangiogram in Detection of Common Bile Duct Stones during Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Cholelithiasis: A Prospective Study Short-term Outcome of Laparoscopic vs Open Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1