An investigation into the impact of soil particle conductivity and percolation threshold on the Hilhorst model to estimate pore water conductivity in soils

Martin S. Goodchild
{"title":"An investigation into the impact of soil particle conductivity and percolation threshold on the Hilhorst model to estimate pore water conductivity in soils","authors":"Martin S. Goodchild","doi":"10.1002/saj2.20561","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The aim of this work has been to assess the Hilhorst model, used for estimating in-soil pore water conductivity, against soil properties of percolation threshold and soil particle conductivity. The Hilhorst model has the benefit of requiring a single soil-specific parameter which makes this model easy to apply from soil permittivity and bulk conductivity measurements. However, the Hilhorst model requires that the bulk conductivity measurement is dominated by pore water conductivity, which is not always the case in many ‘‘real-world’’ settings. This work examines a mathematical framework derived from combining the Hilhorst and Ewing and Hunt models which allows the Hilhorst soil parameter to be derived for a range of soil particle conductivities (0 to 10 mS m<sup>−1</sup>) and percolation thresholds (0 to 0.1 m<sup>3</sup> m<sup>−3</sup>). The analysis in this work indicates that the Hilhorst parameter is highly sensitive to both soil properties with respect to the default value of 4.1 that is often employed. This assessment indicates that: (i) soil particle conductivity can result in the Hilhorst model overestimating pore water conductivity, which becomes more significant for lower bulk conductivities, and, (ii) percolation threshold can result in the Hilhorst model underestimating pore water conductivity, which becomes more significant for lower soil moisture contents. The results from this analysis suggest that the application of the Hilhorst model should be considered against the context of soil particle conductivity and percolation threshold for a given soil under test.</p>","PeriodicalId":101043,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings - Soil Science Society of America","volume":"87 5","pages":"1221-1228"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings - Soil Science Society of America","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/saj2.20561","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this work has been to assess the Hilhorst model, used for estimating in-soil pore water conductivity, against soil properties of percolation threshold and soil particle conductivity. The Hilhorst model has the benefit of requiring a single soil-specific parameter which makes this model easy to apply from soil permittivity and bulk conductivity measurements. However, the Hilhorst model requires that the bulk conductivity measurement is dominated by pore water conductivity, which is not always the case in many ‘‘real-world’’ settings. This work examines a mathematical framework derived from combining the Hilhorst and Ewing and Hunt models which allows the Hilhorst soil parameter to be derived for a range of soil particle conductivities (0 to 10 mS m−1) and percolation thresholds (0 to 0.1 m3 m−3). The analysis in this work indicates that the Hilhorst parameter is highly sensitive to both soil properties with respect to the default value of 4.1 that is often employed. This assessment indicates that: (i) soil particle conductivity can result in the Hilhorst model overestimating pore water conductivity, which becomes more significant for lower bulk conductivities, and, (ii) percolation threshold can result in the Hilhorst model underestimating pore water conductivity, which becomes more significant for lower soil moisture contents. The results from this analysis suggest that the application of the Hilhorst model should be considered against the context of soil particle conductivity and percolation threshold for a given soil under test.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
土壤颗粒电导率和渗透阈值对Hilhorst模型估算土壤孔隙水电导率影响的研究
这项工作的目的是评估用于估计土壤孔隙水电导率的Hilhorst模型,以及渗透阈值和土壤颗粒电导率的土壤特性。Hilhorst模型的优点是需要单个土壤特定参数,这使得该模型易于应用于土壤介电常数和体积电导率测量。然而,Hilhorst模型要求体积电导率测量以孔隙水电导率为主导,这在许多“现实”环境中并不总是如此。这项工作考察了一个数学框架,该框架结合了Hilhorst和Ewing和Hunt模型,该模型允许Hilhorst土壤参数推导出一系列土壤颗粒电导率(0至10 mS m - 1)和渗透阈值(0至0.1 m3 m - 3)。本工作中的分析表明,Hilhorst参数对通常采用的默认值4.1的土壤性质高度敏感。结果表明:(1)土壤颗粒电导率会导致Hilhorst模型高估孔隙水电导率,且在体积电导率较低时更为显著;(2)渗透阈值会导致Hilhorst模型低估孔隙水电导率,且在土壤含水量较低时更为显著。这一分析结果表明,Hilhorst模型的应用应考虑到土壤颗粒电导率和渗透阈值对给定土壤的测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Soil carbon fraction responses to grazing intensity and texture in a semiarid grassland Investigating plasticity and swelling properties of improved expansive soil designs based on hybrid deep learning optimization for high pay load applications Integrated assessment of potassium speciation in Taiwanese soils using chemical extraction and X-ray absorption spectroscopy Comparison of Laboratory- and field-determined soil water retention curves in a well-aggregated tallgrass prairie soil A Green-Ampt model for muddy water considering air resistance based on the layered assumption
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1