An investigation into the impact of soil particle conductivity and percolation threshold on the Hilhorst model to estimate pore water conductivity in soils
{"title":"An investigation into the impact of soil particle conductivity and percolation threshold on the Hilhorst model to estimate pore water conductivity in soils","authors":"Martin S. Goodchild","doi":"10.1002/saj2.20561","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The aim of this work has been to assess the Hilhorst model, used for estimating in-soil pore water conductivity, against soil properties of percolation threshold and soil particle conductivity. The Hilhorst model has the benefit of requiring a single soil-specific parameter which makes this model easy to apply from soil permittivity and bulk conductivity measurements. However, the Hilhorst model requires that the bulk conductivity measurement is dominated by pore water conductivity, which is not always the case in many ‘‘real-world’’ settings. This work examines a mathematical framework derived from combining the Hilhorst and Ewing and Hunt models which allows the Hilhorst soil parameter to be derived for a range of soil particle conductivities (0 to 10 mS m<sup>−1</sup>) and percolation thresholds (0 to 0.1 m<sup>3</sup> m<sup>−3</sup>). The analysis in this work indicates that the Hilhorst parameter is highly sensitive to both soil properties with respect to the default value of 4.1 that is often employed. This assessment indicates that: (i) soil particle conductivity can result in the Hilhorst model overestimating pore water conductivity, which becomes more significant for lower bulk conductivities, and, (ii) percolation threshold can result in the Hilhorst model underestimating pore water conductivity, which becomes more significant for lower soil moisture contents. The results from this analysis suggest that the application of the Hilhorst model should be considered against the context of soil particle conductivity and percolation threshold for a given soil under test.</p>","PeriodicalId":101043,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings - Soil Science Society of America","volume":"87 5","pages":"1221-1228"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings - Soil Science Society of America","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/saj2.20561","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The aim of this work has been to assess the Hilhorst model, used for estimating in-soil pore water conductivity, against soil properties of percolation threshold and soil particle conductivity. The Hilhorst model has the benefit of requiring a single soil-specific parameter which makes this model easy to apply from soil permittivity and bulk conductivity measurements. However, the Hilhorst model requires that the bulk conductivity measurement is dominated by pore water conductivity, which is not always the case in many ‘‘real-world’’ settings. This work examines a mathematical framework derived from combining the Hilhorst and Ewing and Hunt models which allows the Hilhorst soil parameter to be derived for a range of soil particle conductivities (0 to 10 mS m−1) and percolation thresholds (0 to 0.1 m3 m−3). The analysis in this work indicates that the Hilhorst parameter is highly sensitive to both soil properties with respect to the default value of 4.1 that is often employed. This assessment indicates that: (i) soil particle conductivity can result in the Hilhorst model overestimating pore water conductivity, which becomes more significant for lower bulk conductivities, and, (ii) percolation threshold can result in the Hilhorst model underestimating pore water conductivity, which becomes more significant for lower soil moisture contents. The results from this analysis suggest that the application of the Hilhorst model should be considered against the context of soil particle conductivity and percolation threshold for a given soil under test.
这项工作的目的是评估用于估计土壤孔隙水电导率的Hilhorst模型,以及渗透阈值和土壤颗粒电导率的土壤特性。Hilhorst模型的优点是需要单个土壤特定参数,这使得该模型易于应用于土壤介电常数和体积电导率测量。然而,Hilhorst模型要求体积电导率测量以孔隙水电导率为主导,这在许多“现实”环境中并不总是如此。这项工作考察了一个数学框架,该框架结合了Hilhorst和Ewing和Hunt模型,该模型允许Hilhorst土壤参数推导出一系列土壤颗粒电导率(0至10 mS m - 1)和渗透阈值(0至0.1 m3 m - 3)。本工作中的分析表明,Hilhorst参数对通常采用的默认值4.1的土壤性质高度敏感。结果表明:(1)土壤颗粒电导率会导致Hilhorst模型高估孔隙水电导率,且在体积电导率较低时更为显著;(2)渗透阈值会导致Hilhorst模型低估孔隙水电导率,且在土壤含水量较低时更为显著。这一分析结果表明,Hilhorst模型的应用应考虑到土壤颗粒电导率和渗透阈值对给定土壤的测试。