Thematic Book Review: Labor and Elite Domination in the Color Line of U.S. Higher Education

IF 1.8 2区 社会学 Q2 ETHNIC STUDIES Sociology of Race and Ethnicity Pub Date : 2023-05-11 DOI:10.1177/23326492231174507
Prabhdeep Singh Kehal
{"title":"Thematic Book Review: Labor and Elite Domination in the Color Line of U.S. Higher Education","authors":"Prabhdeep Singh Kehal","doi":"10.1177/23326492231174507","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sociologists of race who study the U.S. society after the social movements of the 1960s and 1970s have typically considered how racism persists in a society touted for its commitment to equal opportunity. For studies of U.S. colleges and universities, this question animates inquiries into the higher education context that ask why long-standing marginalization persists among students and faculty despite expanded access to these institutions. Although researchers continue to advocate for including students and faculty from historically excluded backgrounds, sociologists have increasingly turned to historical and structural analyses to explain how access and inclusion alone are not enough to promote student or faculty success (Okechukwu 2019; Wooten 2016). The goal is not nebulous cultural change, which ignores how organizations were formed in relation to racism, but transformative change. With transformative change, structural racism is challenged in its various forms, and individuals create a collective, antiracist orientation to build something new (Chang 2002). From this lens, sociologists have studied how colleges and universities changed their norms of exclusion, particularly from the post-Civil War period onwards. Focusing on how cultural norms changed in different eras of student and faculty relations, scholars traced why college officials pragmatically removed restrictive norms that explicitly privileged White, male, and Protestant students from the colonial social elite (Karabel 2005; Synnott 2010; Wechsler 2014; WilliamsonLott 2018; Wooten 2016). For instance, colleges were the province of the social and economic White elite between the late-1800s and the mid1900s (Brubacher and Rudy 1968), but this changed after World War II when the federal government invested in enrolling students into an expanded, stratified system of advanced education. In the postwar period, advanced training was more accessible because colleges and universities were progressively integrating their White campuses. Although some cautioned that the expansion of access into a stratified system would produce a further stratified society based on credentials, others argued that broadened access represented a necessary move to actualize the United States as a multiracial and multicultural democracy (Collins 2019; Ris 2021). From within this intellectual history enter three new texts on higher education: Doing the Right Thing: How Colleges and Universities Can Undo Systemic Racism in Faculty Hiring by Marybeth 1174507 SREXXX10.1177/23326492231174507Sociology of Race and EthnicityBook Reviews research-article2023","PeriodicalId":46879,"journal":{"name":"Sociology of Race and Ethnicity","volume":"9 1","pages":"402 - 408"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociology of Race and Ethnicity","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23326492231174507","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ETHNIC STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sociologists of race who study the U.S. society after the social movements of the 1960s and 1970s have typically considered how racism persists in a society touted for its commitment to equal opportunity. For studies of U.S. colleges and universities, this question animates inquiries into the higher education context that ask why long-standing marginalization persists among students and faculty despite expanded access to these institutions. Although researchers continue to advocate for including students and faculty from historically excluded backgrounds, sociologists have increasingly turned to historical and structural analyses to explain how access and inclusion alone are not enough to promote student or faculty success (Okechukwu 2019; Wooten 2016). The goal is not nebulous cultural change, which ignores how organizations were formed in relation to racism, but transformative change. With transformative change, structural racism is challenged in its various forms, and individuals create a collective, antiracist orientation to build something new (Chang 2002). From this lens, sociologists have studied how colleges and universities changed their norms of exclusion, particularly from the post-Civil War period onwards. Focusing on how cultural norms changed in different eras of student and faculty relations, scholars traced why college officials pragmatically removed restrictive norms that explicitly privileged White, male, and Protestant students from the colonial social elite (Karabel 2005; Synnott 2010; Wechsler 2014; WilliamsonLott 2018; Wooten 2016). For instance, colleges were the province of the social and economic White elite between the late-1800s and the mid1900s (Brubacher and Rudy 1968), but this changed after World War II when the federal government invested in enrolling students into an expanded, stratified system of advanced education. In the postwar period, advanced training was more accessible because colleges and universities were progressively integrating their White campuses. Although some cautioned that the expansion of access into a stratified system would produce a further stratified society based on credentials, others argued that broadened access represented a necessary move to actualize the United States as a multiracial and multicultural democracy (Collins 2019; Ris 2021). From within this intellectual history enter three new texts on higher education: Doing the Right Thing: How Colleges and Universities Can Undo Systemic Racism in Faculty Hiring by Marybeth 1174507 SREXXX10.1177/23326492231174507Sociology of Race and EthnicityBook Reviews research-article2023
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
主题书评:美国高等教育肤色线中的劳工与精英统治
研究20世纪60年代和70年代社会运动后美国社会的种族社会学家通常会考虑种族主义是如何在一个以机会平等为承诺的社会中持续存在的。对于美国学院和大学的研究来说,这个问题激发了对高等教育背景的探究,即为什么尽管扩大了进入这些机构的机会,但学生和教职员工仍长期处于边缘地位。尽管研究人员继续倡导将来自历史上被排斥背景的学生和教职员工包括在内,但社会学家越来越多地转向历史和结构分析,以解释仅凭获取和包容不足以促进学生或教职员工的成功(Okechukwu 2019;Wooten 2016)。目标不是模糊的文化变革,它忽略了组织是如何在种族主义中形成的,而是变革。随着变革,结构性种族主义受到各种形式的挑战,个人创造了一种集体的反种族主义取向,以建立新的东西(Chang,2002)。从这个角度来看,社会学家研究了学院和大学如何改变他们的排斥规范,特别是从内战后时期开始。学者们关注文化规范在学生和教师关系的不同时代是如何变化的,追溯了为什么大学官员务实地取消了明确将白人、男性和新教学生从殖民社会精英中特权化的限制性规范(Karabel 2005;辛诺特2010;韦克斯勒2014;WilliamsonLott 2018;Wooten 2016)。例如,在1800年代末至1900年代中期(Brubacher和Rudy 1968),大学是白人社会和经济精英的领地,但在第二次世界大战后,当联邦政府投资招收学生进入扩大的分层高等教育体系时,情况发生了变化。在战后时期,高级培训更容易获得,因为学院和大学正在逐步整合他们的白人校园。尽管一些人警告说,将准入扩大到分层制度将产生一个基于学历的进一步分层社会,但另一些人认为,扩大准入代表着实现美国作为一个多种族和多文化民主国家的必要举措(Collins 2019;Ris 2021)。在这段知识史中,输入三本关于高等教育的新文本:《做正确的事:学院和大学如何在教师招聘中消除系统性种族主义》,Marybeth 1174507 SREXXX10.1177/2326492231174507种族和民族社会学书评研究文章2023
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
62
期刊最新文献
Aníbal Quijano: “Rejecting the Shackles of the Eurocentric Worldview” The “People’s Tour” as Conflict Pedagogy: Using Site Visits to Engage Students with the Struggle for Civil Rights Sixty Miles Upriver: Gentrification and Race in a Small American City Students Want to Build Anti-racist Praxis: How to Support Them in the Classroom with Grassroots Organizers Food Power Politics: The Food Story of the Mississippi Civil Rights Movement
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1