In Defence of Future Generations: A Reply to Stephen Humphreys

IF 1.8 3区 社会学 Q2 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS European Journal of International Law Pub Date : 2023-08-03 DOI:10.1093/ejil/chad033
M. Wewerinke‐Singh, Ayan Garg, Shubhangi Agarwalla
{"title":"In Defence of Future Generations: A Reply to Stephen Humphreys","authors":"M. Wewerinke‐Singh, Ayan Garg, Shubhangi Agarwalla","doi":"10.1093/ejil/chad033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In this reply to Stephen Humphreys, we challenge the dismissal of future generations as a locus of responsibility for present generations. Drawing from diverse sources such as indigenous law, environmental jurisprudence and practice, we demonstrate that global discourse on intergenerationality is broader and more nuanced than Humphreys suggests. Our response highlights the importance of incorporating diverse perspectives to enrich discourse and promote an inclusive approach to the progressive development of international law. Further, we contend that ‘future generations’ discourse has emancipatory power, offering potential for reshaping international law based on a vision of justice and solidarity across time and space. We call for increased dialogue and collaboration among scholars, practitioners and frontline communities to ensure that future generations discourse remains grounded in real-world experiences. By persistently interrogating and developing our understanding of responsibilities owed to future generations, we can imagine and cultivate a more inclusive – and, hence, more promising – approach to addressing climate change and related global crises.","PeriodicalId":47727,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of International Law","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of International Law","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chad033","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this reply to Stephen Humphreys, we challenge the dismissal of future generations as a locus of responsibility for present generations. Drawing from diverse sources such as indigenous law, environmental jurisprudence and practice, we demonstrate that global discourse on intergenerationality is broader and more nuanced than Humphreys suggests. Our response highlights the importance of incorporating diverse perspectives to enrich discourse and promote an inclusive approach to the progressive development of international law. Further, we contend that ‘future generations’ discourse has emancipatory power, offering potential for reshaping international law based on a vision of justice and solidarity across time and space. We call for increased dialogue and collaboration among scholars, practitioners and frontline communities to ensure that future generations discourse remains grounded in real-world experiences. By persistently interrogating and developing our understanding of responsibilities owed to future generations, we can imagine and cultivate a more inclusive – and, hence, more promising – approach to addressing climate change and related global crises.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为子孙后代辩护——回复Stephen Humphreys
在对斯蒂芬·汉弗莱斯的答复中,我们对将后代视为当代人的责任中心的做法提出质疑。从土著法律、环境法学和实践等不同来源,我们证明,关于代际关系的全球讨论比Humphreys所说的更广泛、更微妙。我们的答复强调了纳入不同观点的重要性,以丰富讨论并促进国际法逐步发展的包容性方法。此外,我们认为,“子孙后代”话语具有解放力量,为基于跨时空的正义和团结愿景重塑国际法提供了潜力。我们呼吁加强学者、从业者和一线社区之间的对话与合作,以确保后代的话语仍以现实世界的经验为基础。通过不断质疑和发展我们对子孙后代责任的理解,我们可以想象并培养一种更具包容性的——因此也更有希望的——应对气候变化和相关全球危机的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
8.30%
发文量
70
期刊介绍: The European Journal of International Law is firmly established as one of the world"s leading journals in its field. With its distinctive combination of theoretical and practical approaches to the issues of international law, the journal offers readers a unique opportunity to stay in touch with the latest developments in this rapidly evolving area. Each issue of the EJIL provides a forum for the exploration of the conceptual and theoretical dimensions of international law as well as for up-to-date analysis of topical issues. Additionally, it is the only journal to provide systematic coverage of the relationship between international law and the law of the European Union and its Member States.
期刊最新文献
The Progressive Development of International Law on the Return of Stolen Assets: Mapping the Paths Forward A Deeper Understanding of the Constitutional Status of Māori and Their Rights Required: A Reply to Christian Riffel Constitutional Law-making by International Law: The Indigenization of Free Trade Agreements Revisiting Röling and Cassese’s Appraisal of the Tokyo Tribunal Is Imitation Really Flattery? The UK’s Trade Continuity Agreements: A Reply to Joris Larik
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1