CITES and the African Elephant

IF 0.4 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Chinese Journal of Environmental Law Pub Date : 2020-06-03 DOI:10.1163/24686042-12340049
Tatenda Leopold Chakanyuka
{"title":"CITES and the African Elephant","authors":"Tatenda Leopold Chakanyuka","doi":"10.1163/24686042-12340049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThis article focuses on the impact of the ban of international trade of the ivory of the African elephant under the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species. This species is overpopulated in some countries and threatened in other countries. Overall, its current population and the level of decline suggest a species that is endangered. The population disparities have created misunderstandings in terms of how to address the issues. Controversy has surrounded the two instances of legal sales of ivory, and the continuing ban on ivory trade from 1989 has contributed to animosity between pro-ban Western ‘conservationists’ and anti-ban African countries, with accusations of ‘ecological imperialism’ being levelled at some of the protagonists. The article observes that the vast global ivory market has largely been sustained by countries that have failed to effectively enact laws and/or enforce them, as well as failing to deal with corruption and illegal markets within their jurisdictions. It is argued that identifying such culprit countries and their role in promoting elephant poaching and ivory trade, and identifying the reasons behind the poaching and illegal trade, is crucial in reducing the incidence of poaching. The article argues that with a better understanding of the illegal trade, CITES can take deliberate steps to assist countries involved in the ivory trade where they need that support.","PeriodicalId":29889,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Journal of Environmental Law","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/24686042-12340049","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Journal of Environmental Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/24686042-12340049","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article focuses on the impact of the ban of international trade of the ivory of the African elephant under the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species. This species is overpopulated in some countries and threatened in other countries. Overall, its current population and the level of decline suggest a species that is endangered. The population disparities have created misunderstandings in terms of how to address the issues. Controversy has surrounded the two instances of legal sales of ivory, and the continuing ban on ivory trade from 1989 has contributed to animosity between pro-ban Western ‘conservationists’ and anti-ban African countries, with accusations of ‘ecological imperialism’ being levelled at some of the protagonists. The article observes that the vast global ivory market has largely been sustained by countries that have failed to effectively enact laws and/or enforce them, as well as failing to deal with corruption and illegal markets within their jurisdictions. It is argued that identifying such culprit countries and their role in promoting elephant poaching and ivory trade, and identifying the reasons behind the poaching and illegal trade, is crucial in reducing the incidence of poaching. The article argues that with a better understanding of the illegal trade, CITES can take deliberate steps to assist countries involved in the ivory trade where they need that support.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
CITES和非洲象
这篇文章的重点是在《濒危物种国际贸易公约》下禁止非洲象象牙国际贸易的影响。这个物种在一些国家人口过剩,在其他国家受到威胁。总的来说,它目前的数量和下降的程度表明它是一个濒临灭绝的物种。人口差异在如何解决这些问题方面造成了误解。这两起象牙合法销售事件引发了争议,自1989年以来持续的象牙贸易禁令导致了支持禁令的西方“环保主义者”和反对禁令的非洲国家之间的敌意,一些倡导者被指责为“生态帝国主义”。文章指出,庞大的全球象牙市场在很大程度上是由未能有效制定和/或执行法律的国家维持的,也未能在其管辖范围内处理腐败和非法市场。文章认为,找出这些国家及其在促进大象偷猎和象牙贸易中的作用,找出偷猎和非法贸易背后的原因,对减少偷猎事件至关重要。这篇文章认为,对非法贸易有了更好的了解,CITES就可以采取深思熟虑的步骤,在涉及象牙贸易的国家需要支持的时候向它们提供帮助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
25.00%
发文量
6
期刊最新文献
Climate Litigation in a ‘Developmental State’: The Case of China Note from the Co-editors The Right to a Life-Sustaining Climate System: Selected Case Law Climate Litigation: Targeting the Aviation Sector The 2023 Amazon Summit – Regional and Global Relevance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1