Comparison of combustion duration and end-gas autoignition in inwardly and outwardly propagating flames induced by different ignition configurations

IF 1.9 4区 工程技术 Q4 ENERGY & FUELS Combustion Theory and Modelling Pub Date : 2022-12-09 DOI:10.1080/13647830.2022.2153741
Linlin Yang, Yiqing Wang, Zheng Chen
{"title":"Comparison of combustion duration and end-gas autoignition in inwardly and outwardly propagating flames induced by different ignition configurations","authors":"Linlin Yang, Yiqing Wang, Zheng Chen","doi":"10.1080/13647830.2022.2153741","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recently, multiple spark ignition has received great attention since it helps to increase thermal efficiency and to reduce misfire in engines. Multiple spark ignition also affects the combustion duration and thereby it can be used for knock control. However, previous studies reported opposite trends in terms of how multiple spark ignition affects engine knock. This work aims to assess and interpret the influence of flame propagation direction induced by different ignition configurations on combustion duration and end-gas autoignition/engine knock. Two simplified and idealised ignition configurations are studied theoretically and numerically. One is with infinite number of sparks at side circular wall, which induces an inwardly propagating flame (IPF); and the other is with a single central spark, which induces an outwardly propagating flame (OPF). In the asymptotic theoretical analysis, the canonical 1D formulations for IPF and OPF are reduced to 0D model. Based on the 0D model, OPF and IPF at different initial temperatures are studied and compared. Counterintuitively, it is found that the combustion duration of OPF is shorter than that of IPF when there is no end-gas autoignition. On the other hand, the combustion duration of IPF is shorter than that of OPF when end-gas autoignition occurs. Furthermore, end-gas autoignition is found to be more prone to occur in IPF than OPF. These interesting observations are interpreted through assessing the ignition delay time and different components of the absolute flame propagation speed. The theoretical results are validated by transient simulations considering detailed chemistry and transport which are conducted for IPF and OPF in an iso-octane/air mixture at different initial temperatures and pressures. Both theoretical and numerical results suggest that compared to infinite number of ignition sparks at side wall, the single central ignition has the advantages in shortening the combustion duration and reducing the tendency of end-gas autoignition.","PeriodicalId":50665,"journal":{"name":"Combustion Theory and Modelling","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Combustion Theory and Modelling","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13647830.2022.2153741","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recently, multiple spark ignition has received great attention since it helps to increase thermal efficiency and to reduce misfire in engines. Multiple spark ignition also affects the combustion duration and thereby it can be used for knock control. However, previous studies reported opposite trends in terms of how multiple spark ignition affects engine knock. This work aims to assess and interpret the influence of flame propagation direction induced by different ignition configurations on combustion duration and end-gas autoignition/engine knock. Two simplified and idealised ignition configurations are studied theoretically and numerically. One is with infinite number of sparks at side circular wall, which induces an inwardly propagating flame (IPF); and the other is with a single central spark, which induces an outwardly propagating flame (OPF). In the asymptotic theoretical analysis, the canonical 1D formulations for IPF and OPF are reduced to 0D model. Based on the 0D model, OPF and IPF at different initial temperatures are studied and compared. Counterintuitively, it is found that the combustion duration of OPF is shorter than that of IPF when there is no end-gas autoignition. On the other hand, the combustion duration of IPF is shorter than that of OPF when end-gas autoignition occurs. Furthermore, end-gas autoignition is found to be more prone to occur in IPF than OPF. These interesting observations are interpreted through assessing the ignition delay time and different components of the absolute flame propagation speed. The theoretical results are validated by transient simulations considering detailed chemistry and transport which are conducted for IPF and OPF in an iso-octane/air mixture at different initial temperatures and pressures. Both theoretical and numerical results suggest that compared to infinite number of ignition sparks at side wall, the single central ignition has the advantages in shortening the combustion duration and reducing the tendency of end-gas autoignition.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同点火方式引起的向内和向外蔓延火焰的燃烧持续时间和末端气体自燃比较
近年来,多火花点火由于有助于提高发动机的热效率和减少失火而受到极大的关注。多火花点火也会影响燃烧持续时间,因此可以用于爆震控制。然而,先前的研究报告了多火花点火如何影响发动机爆震的相反趋势。本工作旨在评估和解释不同点火配置引起的火焰传播方向对燃烧持续时间和尾气自燃/发动机爆震的影响。对两种简化和理想化的点火结构进行了理论和数值研究。一种是在侧圆壁处产生无限数量的火花,产生向内传播的火焰(IPF);另一种是具有单个中心火花,该中心火花引起向外传播的火焰(OPF)。在渐近理论分析中,将IPF和OPF的规范1D公式简化为0D模型。基于0D模型,对不同初始温度下的OPF和IPF进行了研究和比较。与直觉相反,在没有末端气体自燃的情况下,OPF的燃烧持续时间比IPF短。另一方面,当发生末端气体自燃时,IPF的燃烧持续时间短于OPF。此外,IPF比OPF更容易发生末端气体自燃。这些有趣的观察结果是通过评估点火延迟时间和绝对火焰传播速度的不同分量来解释的。通过瞬态模拟验证了理论结果,该模拟考虑了不同初始温度和压力下异辛烷/空气混合物中IPF和OPF的详细化学和传输。理论和数值计算结果表明,与侧壁无限数量的点火火花相比,单中心点火具有缩短燃烧时间和减少末端气体自燃倾向的优点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Combustion Theory and Modelling
Combustion Theory and Modelling 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
7.70%
发文量
38
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Combustion Theory and Modelling is a leading international journal devoted to the application of mathematical modelling, numerical simulation and experimental techniques to the study of combustion. Articles can cover a wide range of topics, such as: premixed laminar flames, laminar diffusion flames, turbulent combustion, fires, chemical kinetics, pollutant formation, microgravity, materials synthesis, chemical vapour deposition, catalysis, droplet and spray combustion, detonation dynamics, thermal explosions, ignition, energetic materials and propellants, burners and engine combustion. A diverse spectrum of mathematical methods may also be used, including large scale numerical simulation, hybrid computational schemes, front tracking, adaptive mesh refinement, optimized parallel computation, asymptotic methods and singular perturbation techniques, bifurcation theory, optimization methods, dynamical systems theory, cellular automata and discrete methods and probabilistic and statistical methods. Experimental studies that employ intrusive or nonintrusive diagnostics and are published in the Journal should be closely related to theoretical issues, by highlighting fundamental theoretical questions or by providing a sound basis for comparison with theory.
期刊最新文献
LES of premixed jet flames subjected to extreme turbulence using flamelet-generated manifolds: a comparison of unstrained and strained flamelets Effect of ethanol enrichment and engine parameters on the performance of an HCCI engine fuelled with biodiesel/ethanol mixtures Determining the global activation energy of methane–air premixed flames Simulation of reaction initiation in powder compacting from the surface with composite formation in equivalent reaction cell Updated asymptotic structure of cool diffusion flames
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1