Audrey Smedley (1930–2020): A Leading Scholar in the Anthropology and History of Race

IF 1.6 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY Transforming Anthropology Pub Date : 2021-04-01 DOI:10.1111/TRAA.12200
F. Harrison, A. L. Bolles
{"title":"Audrey Smedley (1930–2020): A Leading Scholar in the Anthropology and History of Race","authors":"F. Harrison, A. L. Bolles","doi":"10.1111/TRAA.12200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Audrey Smedley, an African American pioneer in anthropology and African Studies and the leading scholar on the origin and worldview of race, passed away on October 14, 2020, in her home, surrounded by her loving family. She was one of the first eight Black women anthropologists to receive doctorates by the late 1960s. Dr. Smedley earned her BA and MA from the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor and her PhD fromVictoriaUniversity ofManchester (1967), now theUniversity ofManchester (UK). A product of the Detroit public school system, where she was taught by white teachers who begrudgingly gave her well-deserved top grades, Audrey Smedley attended the University of Michigan. In the 1950s, the campus gradually moved away from segregation, permitting Black students to live in dormitories, initially in separate rooms. As Smedley tells us, she became exhausted from the burden of racist experiences with both students and faculty. In her extraordinarily self-revealing essay published in Annual Review of Anthropology (Smedley 2001), she remarks that Black Americans learn to guard their behavior in relationships with the “white ‘others’” (xviii). During her junior-year semester abroad in Paris, she finally felt the meaning of “yearning to breathe free” (xviii). During her time in Paris, she met Africans and African-diasporic people from the Francophone world and found that “race” was of little importance visa-vis their respective cultures, which were much more significant for them and the “wholesome self-confidence” they embodied. For the young Audrey Smedley, this was critical for the next phase of her life. In hindsight, she remarked that “it takes an enormous effort to transcend the identities imposed on us and the stereotypes too many people deal us” (2001, xix). Returning to Ann Arbor, she changed her major to add history to her studies in letters and law. After earning an undergraduate degree, she entered the University of Michigan’s master’s program in anthropology. She continued to take courses in history, whose perspectives deeply influenced her later contributions to anthropology. Under the tutelage of Leslie White, Elman Service, and Marshall Sahlins, Smedley became a student of evolutionary change. The neo-evolutionary perspective saw culture as a phenomenon that should be “studied separately from the biological beings who carry specific cultures” (Smedley 2001, xx). Over time, she observed the contradictions between the science of culture, as White theorized it, and those approaches within the discipline that developed without questioning and being influenced by society’s prevailing racial ideology and its impact on how many Americans interpret human behavior. Smedley would come to conceptualize this phenomenon as a racial worldview (2001; Smedley and Smedley 2018). Following Michigan, Audrey Smedley went to Manchester to further her studies with one of the leaders of the structuralist-functionalist school, Max Gluckman. She found that social anthropologists there were more than just adherents to this way of understanding social systems through structural analysis but were also masters of ethnographic details. It was the significance of social networks, the role of social dramas, the dynamics of social conflict, the recording of economic and social changes, politics, law, ritual, kinship, and marital relationships that made recognizing those","PeriodicalId":44069,"journal":{"name":"Transforming Anthropology","volume":"29 1","pages":"6 - 8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/TRAA.12200","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transforming Anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/TRAA.12200","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Audrey Smedley, an African American pioneer in anthropology and African Studies and the leading scholar on the origin and worldview of race, passed away on October 14, 2020, in her home, surrounded by her loving family. She was one of the first eight Black women anthropologists to receive doctorates by the late 1960s. Dr. Smedley earned her BA and MA from the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor and her PhD fromVictoriaUniversity ofManchester (1967), now theUniversity ofManchester (UK). A product of the Detroit public school system, where she was taught by white teachers who begrudgingly gave her well-deserved top grades, Audrey Smedley attended the University of Michigan. In the 1950s, the campus gradually moved away from segregation, permitting Black students to live in dormitories, initially in separate rooms. As Smedley tells us, she became exhausted from the burden of racist experiences with both students and faculty. In her extraordinarily self-revealing essay published in Annual Review of Anthropology (Smedley 2001), she remarks that Black Americans learn to guard their behavior in relationships with the “white ‘others’” (xviii). During her junior-year semester abroad in Paris, she finally felt the meaning of “yearning to breathe free” (xviii). During her time in Paris, she met Africans and African-diasporic people from the Francophone world and found that “race” was of little importance visa-vis their respective cultures, which were much more significant for them and the “wholesome self-confidence” they embodied. For the young Audrey Smedley, this was critical for the next phase of her life. In hindsight, she remarked that “it takes an enormous effort to transcend the identities imposed on us and the stereotypes too many people deal us” (2001, xix). Returning to Ann Arbor, she changed her major to add history to her studies in letters and law. After earning an undergraduate degree, she entered the University of Michigan’s master’s program in anthropology. She continued to take courses in history, whose perspectives deeply influenced her later contributions to anthropology. Under the tutelage of Leslie White, Elman Service, and Marshall Sahlins, Smedley became a student of evolutionary change. The neo-evolutionary perspective saw culture as a phenomenon that should be “studied separately from the biological beings who carry specific cultures” (Smedley 2001, xx). Over time, she observed the contradictions between the science of culture, as White theorized it, and those approaches within the discipline that developed without questioning and being influenced by society’s prevailing racial ideology and its impact on how many Americans interpret human behavior. Smedley would come to conceptualize this phenomenon as a racial worldview (2001; Smedley and Smedley 2018). Following Michigan, Audrey Smedley went to Manchester to further her studies with one of the leaders of the structuralist-functionalist school, Max Gluckman. She found that social anthropologists there were more than just adherents to this way of understanding social systems through structural analysis but were also masters of ethnographic details. It was the significance of social networks, the role of social dramas, the dynamics of social conflict, the recording of economic and social changes, politics, law, ritual, kinship, and marital relationships that made recognizing those
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
奥黛丽·斯沫特莱(1930-2020):人类学和种族史的领军学者
人类学和非洲研究的非裔美国人先驱、种族起源和世界观的领军学者奥黛丽·斯沫特莱于2020年10月14日在家中去世,身边环绕着她慈爱的家人。她是20世纪60年代末首批获得博士学位的八位黑人女性人类学家之一。史沫特莱博士获得了密歇根大学安娜堡分校的文学学士和文学硕士学位,并获得了曼彻斯特维多利亚大学(1967年),即现在的曼彻斯特大学(英国)的博士学位。作为底特律公立学校系统的产物,奥黛丽·斯梅德利就读于密歇根大学,在那里,白人教师不情愿地给她应得的高分。20世纪50年代,校园逐渐摆脱了种族隔离,允许黑人学生住在宿舍,最初是分开的房间。正如史沫特莱告诉我们的那样,她被学生和教师的种族主义经历所累。在她发表在《人类学年度评论》(Smedley 2001)上的一篇非常自我揭露的文章中,她指出,美国黑人学会在与“白人‘他人’的关系中保护自己的行为”(xvii)。在巴黎留学的大三学期,她终于感受到了“渴望自由呼吸”的意义(xvii)。在巴黎期间,她遇到了来自法语世界的非洲人和非洲流散者,发现“种族”对他们各自的文化来说并不重要,而文化对他们和他们所体现的“健康的自信”来说意义重大得多。对于年轻的奥黛丽·斯沫特莱来说,这对她人生的下一阶段至关重要。事后看来,她表示“要超越强加在我们身上的身份和太多人对我们的刻板印象,需要付出巨大的努力”(2001,xix)。回到安娜堡后,她改变了专业,在文学和法律研究中增加了历史。在获得本科学位后,她进入了密歇根大学人类学硕士项目。她继续学习历史课程,这些课程的观点深深影响了她后来对人类学的贡献。在Leslie White、Elman Service和Marshall Sahlins的指导下,史沫特莱成为了进化变化的学生。新进化论认为文化是一种现象,应该“与携带特定文化的生物分开研究”(Smedley 2001,xx)。随着时间的推移,她观察到了怀特理论化的文化科学与学科中那些在没有质疑的情况下发展起来的方法之间的矛盾,这些方法受到了社会主流种族意识形态及其对多少美国人解释人类行为的影响。史沫特莱将这一现象概念化为一种种族世界观(2001;史沫特莱·斯沫特莱,2018)。继密歇根大学之后,奥黛丽·斯沫特莱前往曼彻斯特,与结构主义功能主义学派的领袖之一马克斯·格鲁克曼一起深造。她发现,社会人类学家不仅仅是这种通过结构分析来理解社会系统的方式的追随者,他们还是人种学细节的大师。正是社交网络的重要性、社会戏剧的作用、社会冲突的动态、经济和社会变化的记录、政治、法律、仪式、亲属关系和婚姻关系,才使人们认识到
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
期刊最新文献
Commentary on "The Impact of Vertical Integration on Physician Behavior and Healthcare Delivery: Evidence from Gastroenterology Practices". Style Guide for Authors From Savage to Negro: Anthropology and the Construction of Race, 1896–1954Twenty‐Five Years Later From Savage to Negro: The Only Required Text The Learning Is in the Contradictions: Lee D. Baker and the Complexities of Race and Racism in Anthropology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1