Extracorporeal shockwave therapy in the treatment of patellar tendinopathy: A randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial

IF 1.2 Q3 SPORT SCIENCES Translational sports medicine Pub Date : 2021-03-20 DOI:10.1002/tsm2.246
Thøger Persson Krogh, Jacob Kaae Astrup, Charlotte Kyed, U. Fredberg
{"title":"Extracorporeal shockwave therapy in the treatment of patellar tendinopathy: A randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial","authors":"Thøger Persson Krogh, Jacob Kaae Astrup, Charlotte Kyed, U. Fredberg","doi":"10.1002/tsm2.246","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Patellar tendinopathy is a common injury in athletes. The purpuse was to examine whether extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) was more effective than placebo in the treatment patellar tendinopathy. Thirty‐six athletes were randomly assigned to receive either three ESWT treatments or three placebo treatments. The primary endpoints were changes in pain while walking, at rest, and when the tendon was squeezed on a 0‐10 numeric rating scale. Secondary outcomes included treatment satisfaction and ultrasonographic outcomes. After 12 weeks, ESWT was more effective than placebo regarding pain while walking, mean difference [MD] 1.4 (P = .011). There was no difference in pain at rest, MD 0.4 (P = .404) or pain when the tendon was squeezed, MD 0.3 (P = .221). Regarding the secondary outcomes, ESWT was more effective than placebo with regard to patient‐rated treatment effect, but no improvements were observed in the ultrasonographic outcomes. Improvement was observed after 12 weeks in the ESWT group regarding pain while walking but not regarding pain at rest, when the tendon was squeezed, and on ultrasonography. These findings provide limited support for the use of ESWT, but the clinical relevance is still unclear.","PeriodicalId":75247,"journal":{"name":"Translational sports medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/tsm2.246","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational sports medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/tsm2.246","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Patellar tendinopathy is a common injury in athletes. The purpuse was to examine whether extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) was more effective than placebo in the treatment patellar tendinopathy. Thirty‐six athletes were randomly assigned to receive either three ESWT treatments or three placebo treatments. The primary endpoints were changes in pain while walking, at rest, and when the tendon was squeezed on a 0‐10 numeric rating scale. Secondary outcomes included treatment satisfaction and ultrasonographic outcomes. After 12 weeks, ESWT was more effective than placebo regarding pain while walking, mean difference [MD] 1.4 (P = .011). There was no difference in pain at rest, MD 0.4 (P = .404) or pain when the tendon was squeezed, MD 0.3 (P = .221). Regarding the secondary outcomes, ESWT was more effective than placebo with regard to patient‐rated treatment effect, but no improvements were observed in the ultrasonographic outcomes. Improvement was observed after 12 weeks in the ESWT group regarding pain while walking but not regarding pain at rest, when the tendon was squeezed, and on ultrasonography. These findings provide limited support for the use of ESWT, but the clinical relevance is still unclear.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
体外冲击波治疗髌腱病:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验
髌骨肌腱病是运动员常见的损伤。目的是研究体外冲击波疗法(ESWT)在治疗髌骨肌腱病方面是否比安慰剂更有效。36名运动员被随机分配接受三种ESWT治疗或三种安慰剂治疗。主要终点是行走、休息和肌腱受压时疼痛的变化,评分为0 - 10。次要结果包括治疗满意度和超声检查结果。12周后,ESWT对行走疼痛的治疗效果优于安慰剂,平均差异[MD] 1.4 (P = 0.011)。休息时疼痛,md0.4 (P = .404),或肌腱受压时疼痛,md0.3 (P = .221)无差异。至于次要结果,ESWT在患者评价的治疗效果方面比安慰剂更有效,但在超声结果方面没有观察到改善。12周后,ESWT组行走时疼痛有所改善,但休息时疼痛、肌腱受压时疼痛和超声检查均无改善。这些发现为ESWT的使用提供了有限的支持,但其临床相关性仍不清楚。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of the Anatomical Cross-Sectional Area of Psoas Major Muscle Using an Ultrasound Imaging System Combined With an Inertial Measurement Unit: Improved Reliability in the US Using IMU-Based Positioning Techniques. Effect of 1-Week Weight Loss While Maintaining Total Body Water on Jump Performance. Lower Extremity Asymmetry Values Derived From Multiple Strength Testing Modes Are Associated With Perceived Functional Capabilities Among University Athletes. Athlete Monitoring Systems in Elite Men's Basketball: Challenges, Recommendations, and Future Perspectives. An Injury Prevention Programme in Physical Education Teacher Education Students: Process Evaluation Using the RE-AIM Sports Setting Matrix.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1