Obstacles to health care research projects at the University of Jordan: a cross-sectional survey

Q2 Social Sciences European Science Editing Pub Date : 2021-04-30 DOI:10.3897/ESE.2021.E61658
Randa I. Farah, Saif Aldeen AlRyalat, Wala'a Aburumman, Dana Sakaji, Muna Alhusban, Reema Hamasha, Majd Alkhrissat, Mohammad Qablawi, Ayat Alni’mat
{"title":"Obstacles to health care research projects at the University of Jordan: a cross-sectional survey","authors":"Randa I. Farah, Saif Aldeen AlRyalat, Wala'a Aburumman, Dana Sakaji, Muna Alhusban, Reema Hamasha, Majd Alkhrissat, Mohammad Qablawi, Ayat Alni’mat","doi":"10.3897/ESE.2021.E61658","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To assess the obstacles faced by biomedical researchers in Jordan and the reasons behind the stagnation of health care research. Background: Health care research is essential for the advancement of medical care but faces obstacles that delay the completion of research projects, and the literature is still deficient, especially in developing countries. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted of all academic staff of health care faculties at the University of Jordan who had been employed for five years or more and had at least one stagnant research project. Questionnaires were completed by the academic staff online using Google Forms after a face-to-face interview to explain the study process to them. Results: A total of 82 researchers with a mean age of 42.68 (±9.16) years were included most of whom (84.1%) had only one stagnant project. Of the 106 stagnant projects, 28.3% were in the basic sciences and 71.7% were in clinical research. Almost a third (29.5%) of the projects remained stagnant after reaching the publication stage. Most researchers (81.3%) identified lack of time and high workload as the most common personal barriers and 44.4% identified lack of funds and research incentives as the most common institutional barriers. Conclusions: Medical research is affected by different barriers including lack of time, high workload, lack of funds, and insufficient incentives for research. An institutional strategic plan is required to overcome those barriers and to improve medical research.","PeriodicalId":35360,"journal":{"name":"European Science Editing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Science Editing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3897/ESE.2021.E61658","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: To assess the obstacles faced by biomedical researchers in Jordan and the reasons behind the stagnation of health care research. Background: Health care research is essential for the advancement of medical care but faces obstacles that delay the completion of research projects, and the literature is still deficient, especially in developing countries. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted of all academic staff of health care faculties at the University of Jordan who had been employed for five years or more and had at least one stagnant research project. Questionnaires were completed by the academic staff online using Google Forms after a face-to-face interview to explain the study process to them. Results: A total of 82 researchers with a mean age of 42.68 (±9.16) years were included most of whom (84.1%) had only one stagnant project. Of the 106 stagnant projects, 28.3% were in the basic sciences and 71.7% were in clinical research. Almost a third (29.5%) of the projects remained stagnant after reaching the publication stage. Most researchers (81.3%) identified lack of time and high workload as the most common personal barriers and 44.4% identified lack of funds and research incentives as the most common institutional barriers. Conclusions: Medical research is affected by different barriers including lack of time, high workload, lack of funds, and insufficient incentives for research. An institutional strategic plan is required to overcome those barriers and to improve medical research.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
约旦大学医疗保健研究项目的障碍:一项横断面调查
目的:评估约旦生物医学研究人员面临的障碍以及医疗保健研究停滞不前的原因。背景:医疗保健研究对医疗保健的发展至关重要,但面临着阻碍研究项目完成的障碍,而且文献仍然不足,尤其是在发展中国家。方法:对约旦大学卫生保健系的所有学术人员进行横断面调查,这些人员已工作五年或五年以上,并且至少有一个研究项目停滞不前。在面对面采访后,学术人员使用谷歌表格在线完成问卷调查,向他们解释研究过程。结果:共有82名研究人员,平均年龄42.68(±9.16)岁,其中大多数(84.1%)只有一个停滞不前的项目。在106个停滞不前的项目中,基础科学占28.3%,临床研究占71.7%。近三分之一(29.5%)的项目在进入出版阶段后仍然停滞不前。大多数研究人员(81.3%)认为缺乏时间和高工作量是最常见的个人障碍,44.4%的研究人员认为缺乏资金和研究激励是最普遍的制度障碍。结论:医学研究受到不同障碍的影响,包括缺乏时间、工作量大、缺乏资金和研究激励不足。需要制定一项机构战略计划来克服这些障碍并改进医学研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Science Editing
European Science Editing Social Sciences-Communication
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: EASE"s journal, European Science Editing , publishes articles, reports meetings, announces new developments and forthcoming events, reviews books, software and online resources, and highlights publications of interest to members.
期刊最新文献
Introducing the EASE Interactive Checklist for Submitting Authors A journal veracity–diligence index Lists of predatory journals and publishers: a review for future refinement Article processing charges suppress the scholarship of doctoral students Bibliometric analysis of publications trends in Indonesian research institutions: A comparison of pre-integration (2015–2021) and post-integration (2022–2023) periods
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1