Knowledge-sharing attitude and behavior of civil servants: motivations behind rewards

IF 2.4 3区 管理学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS Aslib Journal of Information Management Pub Date : 2023-08-23 DOI:10.1108/ajim-01-2023-0016
Kristy Lam, E. Kong, Dickson K. W. Chiu, Kevin K. W. Ho
{"title":"Knowledge-sharing attitude and behavior of civil servants: motivations behind rewards","authors":"Kristy Lam, E. Kong, Dickson K. W. Chiu, Kevin K. W. Ho","doi":"10.1108/ajim-01-2023-0016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeTo a large extent, knowledge in government workplaces resides within the hierarchy as it provides unique services to the public. Governments should preserve and pass on valuable and irreplaceable knowledge in providing their services through learning by sharing. Yet, sharing requires time and effort. This study examines the motivations of civil servants to share knowledge and their knowledge-sharing behaviors.Design/methodology/approachThe authors conducted an online survey to collect quantitative data from civil servants in the Hong Kong Government and obtained 104 useable responses to test the eight hypotheses comprising six constructs by structural equation modeling to explore the participants' knowledge-sharing behaviors.FindingsResults indicated that (1) expected contribution was the primary source of motivation behind knowledge sharing; (2) participants engaged more frequently in informal than formal knowledge-sharing activities; and (3) there was a dire need for knowledge sharing focusing on explicit knowledge of work procedures.Originality/valueThe research focuses on motivational factors for knowledge sharing. Despite abundant literature about knowledge sharing in public or governmental organizations, scant studies focus on the motivations behind why expected rewards and expected associations have less significant impacts on the attitude toward knowledge sharing than expected contribution.","PeriodicalId":53152,"journal":{"name":"Aslib Journal of Information Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aslib Journal of Information Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ajim-01-2023-0016","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeTo a large extent, knowledge in government workplaces resides within the hierarchy as it provides unique services to the public. Governments should preserve and pass on valuable and irreplaceable knowledge in providing their services through learning by sharing. Yet, sharing requires time and effort. This study examines the motivations of civil servants to share knowledge and their knowledge-sharing behaviors.Design/methodology/approachThe authors conducted an online survey to collect quantitative data from civil servants in the Hong Kong Government and obtained 104 useable responses to test the eight hypotheses comprising six constructs by structural equation modeling to explore the participants' knowledge-sharing behaviors.FindingsResults indicated that (1) expected contribution was the primary source of motivation behind knowledge sharing; (2) participants engaged more frequently in informal than formal knowledge-sharing activities; and (3) there was a dire need for knowledge sharing focusing on explicit knowledge of work procedures.Originality/valueThe research focuses on motivational factors for knowledge sharing. Despite abundant literature about knowledge sharing in public or governmental organizations, scant studies focus on the motivations behind why expected rewards and expected associations have less significant impacts on the attitude toward knowledge sharing than expected contribution.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
公务员知识分享态度与行为:奖励背后的动机
在很大程度上,政府工作场所的知识存在于等级制度中,因为它为公众提供独特的服务。各国政府在提供服务时应通过分享学习的方式保存和传递宝贵和不可替代的知识。然而,分享需要时间和精力。本研究探讨公务员知识分享的动机及其知识分享行为。设计/方法/方法通过网上问卷调查,收集香港政府公务员的定量数据,获得104份可用回复,运用结构方程模型检验6个构式的8个假设,探讨参与者的知识共享行为。研究结果表明:(1)期望贡献是知识共享的主要动力来源;(2)参与者参与非正式知识共享活动的频率高于正式知识共享活动;(3)迫切需要以工作流程显性知识为核心的知识共享。原创性/价值本研究关注知识共享的激励因素。尽管有大量关于公共或政府组织知识共享的文献,但很少有研究关注预期奖励和预期关联对知识共享态度的影响低于预期贡献的影响背后的动机。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Aslib Journal of Information Management
Aslib Journal of Information Management COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
19.20%
发文量
79
期刊介绍: Aslib Journal of Information Management covers a broad range of issues in the field, including economic, behavioural, social, ethical, technological, international, business-related, political and management-orientated factors. Contributors are encouraged to spell out the practical implications of their work. Aslib Journal of Information Management Areas of interest include topics such as social media, data protection, search engines, information retrieval, digital libraries, information behaviour, intellectual property and copyright, information industry, digital repositories and information policy and governance.
期刊最新文献
Exploring the impact of team engagement on patient satisfaction: insights from social support and transactive memory system Factors affecting user intention to use social commerce continuously from a habit perspective What decision-making process do mHealth users go through when faced with privacy disclosure behaviors? A dual trade-off perspective Collaborative online shopping: customer satisfaction and the influence of product type, gender and involvement An associative text analyzer to facilitate effectiveness of exploring historical texts for digital humanities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1