Model averaging for estimating treatment effects

IF 0.8 4区 数学 Q3 STATISTICS & PROBABILITY Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics Pub Date : 2023-06-30 DOI:10.1007/s10463-023-00876-4
Zhihao Zhao, Xinyu Zhang, Guohua Zou, Alan T. K. Wan, Geoffrey K. F. Tso
{"title":"Model averaging for estimating treatment effects","authors":"Zhihao Zhao,&nbsp;Xinyu Zhang,&nbsp;Guohua Zou,&nbsp;Alan T. K. Wan,&nbsp;Geoffrey K. F. Tso","doi":"10.1007/s10463-023-00876-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The estimation of treatment effects on the response variable is often a primary goal in empirical investigations in disciplines such as medicine, economics and marketing. Typically, the investigator would select one model from a multitude of models and estimate the treatment effects based on this single winning model. In this paper, we consider an alternative model averaging approach, where estimates of treatment effects are obtained from not one single model but a weighted ensemble of models. We develop a weight choice method based on a minimisation of the approximate risk under squared error loss of the model average estimator of the conditional treatment effects. We prove that the model average estimator resulting from this criterion has an optimal asymptotic property. The results of a simulation study show that the proposed approach is superior to various existing model selection and averaging methods in a large region of the parameter space in finite samples. The proposed method is applied to a data set on HIV treatment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55511,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10463-023-00876-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"STATISTICS & PROBABILITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The estimation of treatment effects on the response variable is often a primary goal in empirical investigations in disciplines such as medicine, economics and marketing. Typically, the investigator would select one model from a multitude of models and estimate the treatment effects based on this single winning model. In this paper, we consider an alternative model averaging approach, where estimates of treatment effects are obtained from not one single model but a weighted ensemble of models. We develop a weight choice method based on a minimisation of the approximate risk under squared error loss of the model average estimator of the conditional treatment effects. We prove that the model average estimator resulting from this criterion has an optimal asymptotic property. The results of a simulation study show that the proposed approach is superior to various existing model selection and averaging methods in a large region of the parameter space in finite samples. The proposed method is applied to a data set on HIV treatment.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于估计治疗效果的模型平均
在医学、经济学和市场营销等学科的实证研究中,估计治疗效果对响应变量的影响往往是首要目标。通常情况下,研究人员会从众多模型中选择一个模型,并根据这个单一的获胜模型来估计治疗效果。在本文中,我们考虑了另一种模型平均法,即不是从一个单一模型,而是从一系列加权模型中获得治疗效果的估计值。我们开发了一种权重选择方法,该方法基于条件治疗效果的模型平均估计值平方误差损失下近似风险的最小化。我们证明,根据这一标准得出的模型平均估计值具有最优渐近特性。模拟研究结果表明,在有限样本参数空间的较大区域内,所提出的方法优于现有的各种模型选择和平均方法。所提出的方法适用于艾滋病治疗数据集。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics (AISM) aims to provide a forum for open communication among statisticians, and to contribute to the advancement of statistics as a science to enable humans to handle information in order to cope with uncertainties. It publishes high-quality papers that shed new light on the theoretical, computational and/or methodological aspects of statistical science. Emphasis is placed on (a) development of new methodologies motivated by real data, (b) development of unifying theories, and (c) analysis and improvement of existing methodologies and theories.
期刊最新文献
Estimation of value-at-risk by $$L^{p}$$ quantile regression Simplified quasi-likelihood analysis for a locally asymptotically quadratic random field Asymptotic expected sensitivity function and its applications to measures of monotone association Penalized estimation for non-identifiable models Hidden AR process and adaptive Kalman filter
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1