Can gold or silver be used as a hedge against policy uncertainty and COVID-19 in the Chinese market?

IF 9 1区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE China Finance Review International Pub Date : 2022-06-20 DOI:10.1108/cfri-12-2021-0232
T. Chiang
{"title":"Can gold or silver be used as a hedge against policy uncertainty and COVID-19 in the Chinese market?","authors":"T. Chiang","doi":"10.1108/cfri-12-2021-0232","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThe purpose of this study is to present evidence as to whether the use of gold or silver can be justified as an asset to hedge against policy uncertainty and COVID-19 in the Chinese market.Design/methodology/approachBy using a GARCH model with a generalized error distribution (GED), this study specifies that the gold (or silver) return is a function of a set of economic and uncertainty variables, which include volatility from interest rate innovation, a change in economic policy uncertainty (EPU), a change in geopolitical risk (GPR) and volatility due to pandemic diseases, while controlling for stock market returns, inflation rates, economic growth and the Chinese currency value.FindingsThis study employs monthly data of gold and silver prices over the period from January 2002 to August 2021 to examine hedging behavior. Estimated results show that the gold return is positively correlated to the stock return and a rise in uncertainty from economic policy innovation, geopolitical risk, volatility due to US interest rate innovation as well as COVID-19 infection. This result suggests that gold cannot be used to hedge against a stock market decline, but can be used to hedge against uncertainty in general. However, the silver return only responds positively to a rise in uncertainty from the inflation rate and geopolitical risk. Evidence shows that silver returns are negatively correlated with stock returns, and display hedging characteristics. However, the evidence lacks statistically significance during the COVID-19 period, suggesting that the role of silver as a safe-haven asset against stock market turmoil is weak for this time period.Research limitations/implicationsMore general nonlinear specifications can be developed. The tests may include different measures of uncertainty that interact with each other or with the lagged error terms. An implication of the model is that gold can be used to hedge against a broad range of uncertainties for economic policy change, political risk and/or a pandemic. However, the use of gold as an asset to hedge against a stock downturn in Chinese market should be done with caution.Practical implicationsThis study has important policy implications as regards a choice in assets in formatting a portfolio to hedge against uncertainty. Specifically, this study presents empirical evidence on gold and silver return behavior and finds that gold returns respond positively to heightened uncertainty. Thus, gold is a good asset to hedge against uncertainty arising from policy innovations and infectious disease uncertainty.Social implicationsThis paper provides insightful information on the choice of assets toward hedging against risk in the uncertainty market conditions. It provides information to investors and policy makers to use gold price movements as a signal for detecting the arrival of uncertainty. This study also provides information for demanding a risk premium for infectious disease.Originality/valueThis study empirically analyzes and verifies the role that gold serves as a safe haven asset to hedge against uncertainty in the Chinese market. This paper contributes to the literature by presenting evidence of risk/uncertainty premiums for holding gold against various sources of uncertainty such as economic policy uncertainty, geopolitical risk and equity market volatility due to US interest rate innovation and/or COVID-19. This study finds evidence that supports the use of a nonlinear specification, which demonstrates the interaction of uncertainty with the lagged change of infectious disease and helps to explain the gold/silver return behavior. Further, evidence shows that the gold return is positively correlated to the stock return. This finding contrasts with evidence in the US market. However, silver returns are negatively correlated with stock returns, but this correlation becomes insignificant during the period of COVID-19.","PeriodicalId":44440,"journal":{"name":"China Finance Review International","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"China Finance Review International","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/cfri-12-2021-0232","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this study is to present evidence as to whether the use of gold or silver can be justified as an asset to hedge against policy uncertainty and COVID-19 in the Chinese market.Design/methodology/approachBy using a GARCH model with a generalized error distribution (GED), this study specifies that the gold (or silver) return is a function of a set of economic and uncertainty variables, which include volatility from interest rate innovation, a change in economic policy uncertainty (EPU), a change in geopolitical risk (GPR) and volatility due to pandemic diseases, while controlling for stock market returns, inflation rates, economic growth and the Chinese currency value.FindingsThis study employs monthly data of gold and silver prices over the period from January 2002 to August 2021 to examine hedging behavior. Estimated results show that the gold return is positively correlated to the stock return and a rise in uncertainty from economic policy innovation, geopolitical risk, volatility due to US interest rate innovation as well as COVID-19 infection. This result suggests that gold cannot be used to hedge against a stock market decline, but can be used to hedge against uncertainty in general. However, the silver return only responds positively to a rise in uncertainty from the inflation rate and geopolitical risk. Evidence shows that silver returns are negatively correlated with stock returns, and display hedging characteristics. However, the evidence lacks statistically significance during the COVID-19 period, suggesting that the role of silver as a safe-haven asset against stock market turmoil is weak for this time period.Research limitations/implicationsMore general nonlinear specifications can be developed. The tests may include different measures of uncertainty that interact with each other or with the lagged error terms. An implication of the model is that gold can be used to hedge against a broad range of uncertainties for economic policy change, political risk and/or a pandemic. However, the use of gold as an asset to hedge against a stock downturn in Chinese market should be done with caution.Practical implicationsThis study has important policy implications as regards a choice in assets in formatting a portfolio to hedge against uncertainty. Specifically, this study presents empirical evidence on gold and silver return behavior and finds that gold returns respond positively to heightened uncertainty. Thus, gold is a good asset to hedge against uncertainty arising from policy innovations and infectious disease uncertainty.Social implicationsThis paper provides insightful information on the choice of assets toward hedging against risk in the uncertainty market conditions. It provides information to investors and policy makers to use gold price movements as a signal for detecting the arrival of uncertainty. This study also provides information for demanding a risk premium for infectious disease.Originality/valueThis study empirically analyzes and verifies the role that gold serves as a safe haven asset to hedge against uncertainty in the Chinese market. This paper contributes to the literature by presenting evidence of risk/uncertainty premiums for holding gold against various sources of uncertainty such as economic policy uncertainty, geopolitical risk and equity market volatility due to US interest rate innovation and/or COVID-19. This study finds evidence that supports the use of a nonlinear specification, which demonstrates the interaction of uncertainty with the lagged change of infectious disease and helps to explain the gold/silver return behavior. Further, evidence shows that the gold return is positively correlated to the stock return. This finding contrasts with evidence in the US market. However, silver returns are negatively correlated with stock returns, but this correlation becomes insignificant during the period of COVID-19.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
黄金或白银可以用来对冲中国市场的政策不确定性和新冠肺炎吗?
目的本研究的目的是提供证据,证明使用黄金或白银作为对冲中国市场政策不确定性和新冠肺炎的资产是否合理。设计/方法/方法通过使用具有广义误差分布(GED)的GARCH模型,本研究规定黄金(或白银)回报率是一组经济和不确定性变量的函数,这些变量包括利率创新的波动性、经济政策不确定性(EPU)的变化、地缘政治风险(GPR)的变化和流行病引起的波动,同时控制股市回报、通货膨胀率、经济增长和人民币币值。发现本研究采用2002年1月至2021年8月期间的黄金和白银价格月度数据来检验套期保值行为。估计结果显示,黄金回报率与股票回报率呈正相关,经济政策创新、地缘政治风险、美国利率创新导致的波动以及新冠肺炎感染导致的不确定性增加。这一结果表明,黄金不能用来对冲股市下跌,但通常可以用来对冲不确定性。然而,白银回报只是对通货膨胀率和地缘政治风险带来的不确定性上升做出了积极反应。有证据表明,白银收益率与股票收益率呈负相关,并表现出套期保值特征。然而,在新冠肺炎期间,证据缺乏统计意义,表明在这段时间内,白银作为抵御股市动荡的安全资产的作用较弱。研究局限性/含义可以制定更通用的非线性规范。测试可能包括相互作用或与滞后误差项相互作用的不同不确定性度量。该模型的一个含义是,黄金可以用来对冲经济政策变化、政治风险和/或疫情带来的广泛不确定性。然而,使用黄金作为对冲中国股市下跌的资产应该谨慎。实际含义本研究对资产选择在形成投资组合以对冲不确定性方面具有重要的政策含义。具体而言,本研究提供了关于黄金和白银回报行为的经验证据,并发现黄金回报对不确定性的增加做出了积极反应。因此,黄金是对冲政策创新和传染病不确定性带来的不确定性的好资产。社会含义本文提供了关于在不确定性市场条件下对冲风险的资产选择的深刻信息。它为投资者和政策制定者提供信息,利用金价走势作为检测不确定性到来的信号。这项研究还为要求传染病风险溢价提供了信息。原创性/价值本研究实证分析和验证了黄金作为避险资产在中国市场对冲不确定性的作用。本文提供了持有黄金的风险/不确定性溢价的证据,以应对各种不确定性来源,如美国利率创新和/或新冠肺炎导致的经济政策不确定性、地缘政治风险和股票市场波动。这项研究发现了支持使用非线性规范的证据,该规范证明了不确定性与传染病滞后变化的相互作用,并有助于解释金/银回报行为。此外,有证据表明,黄金回报率与股票回报率呈正相关。这一发现与美国市场的证据形成了鲜明对比。然而,白银回报率与股票回报率呈负相关,但在新冠肺炎期间,这种相关性变得微不足道。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.40
自引率
1.20%
发文量
112
期刊介绍: China Finance Review International publishes original and high-quality theoretical and empirical articles focusing on financial and economic issues arising from China's reform, opening-up, economic development, and system transformation. The journal serves as a platform for exchange between Chinese finance scholars and international financial economists, covering a wide range of topics including monetary policy, banking, international trade and finance, corporate finance, asset pricing, market microstructure, corporate governance, incentive studies, fiscal policy, public management, and state-owned enterprise reform.
期刊最新文献
The valuation demand for accounting conservatism: evidence from firm-level climate risk measures Who gains favor with green investors amidst climate risk? Do green economy stocks matter for the carbon and energy markets? Evidence of connectedness effects and hedging strategies Exploring interconnections and risk evaluation of green equities and bonds: fresh perspectives from TVP-VAR model and wavelet-based VaR analysis Institutional ownership and cost of equity of Chinese firms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1