Rising Authoritarianism(s) and the Globalization of Law: An Initial Exploration

Z. U. Türem
{"title":"Rising Authoritarianism(s) and the Globalization of Law: An Initial Exploration","authors":"Z. U. Türem","doi":"10.2979/INDJGLOLEGSTU.26.1.0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT:This article explores the question \"what does the future hold for the globalization of law?\" In analyzing the future of legal globalization, I suggest that analyzing the recent rise of authoritarianism, both at the national as well as transnational plane, offers significant insights. I make three related observations regarding the rise of authoritarian politics. First, the rise of authoritarian and semi-authoritarian regimes and the blend of populism with authoritarianism at the national contexts seems to obstruct globalization of law. This is likely due to the fact that the power of authoritarian politics mostly comes from their populist appeal to the masses who stand to lose from globalization. For such appeal to continue, authoritarian politicians cultivate antiglobalization rhetoric and practices. The end result is a move away from globalized relations and institutional connectedness between different national legal systems. The similarity of the grammar out of which such authoritarianism is produced in various different national contexts, however, urges us to reflect on the globalized relations that structure such similarity. Second, the rise of authoritarian tendencies in domestic and supranational institutions, particularly in the name of political and economic emergency, may bring about a level of legal uniformity and thus globalization of law. I suggest, however, that what globalizes in such context is an essentially instrumentalized version of law, and a deeper reflection on \"what globalizes?\" is required as well as whether it could properly be called \"law.\" Third, as an extension of the second point, this article focuses on neoliberalism as the broad political economic background that informs the globalization of law in the post-1980 period. I suggest that the instrumentalization of law, both domestically and internationally, is rendered possible by the fact that, under a neoliberal economic way of thinking and practice, economization spreads to all spheres of life and renders other institutional settings adjunct to itself. Such instrumentalization also includes the law and takes away from the power of this institutional field.","PeriodicalId":39188,"journal":{"name":"Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies","volume":"26 1","pages":"1 - 29"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2979/INDJGLOLEGSTU.26.1.0001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT:This article explores the question "what does the future hold for the globalization of law?" In analyzing the future of legal globalization, I suggest that analyzing the recent rise of authoritarianism, both at the national as well as transnational plane, offers significant insights. I make three related observations regarding the rise of authoritarian politics. First, the rise of authoritarian and semi-authoritarian regimes and the blend of populism with authoritarianism at the national contexts seems to obstruct globalization of law. This is likely due to the fact that the power of authoritarian politics mostly comes from their populist appeal to the masses who stand to lose from globalization. For such appeal to continue, authoritarian politicians cultivate antiglobalization rhetoric and practices. The end result is a move away from globalized relations and institutional connectedness between different national legal systems. The similarity of the grammar out of which such authoritarianism is produced in various different national contexts, however, urges us to reflect on the globalized relations that structure such similarity. Second, the rise of authoritarian tendencies in domestic and supranational institutions, particularly in the name of political and economic emergency, may bring about a level of legal uniformity and thus globalization of law. I suggest, however, that what globalizes in such context is an essentially instrumentalized version of law, and a deeper reflection on "what globalizes?" is required as well as whether it could properly be called "law." Third, as an extension of the second point, this article focuses on neoliberalism as the broad political economic background that informs the globalization of law in the post-1980 period. I suggest that the instrumentalization of law, both domestically and internationally, is rendered possible by the fact that, under a neoliberal economic way of thinking and practice, economization spreads to all spheres of life and renders other institutional settings adjunct to itself. Such instrumentalization also includes the law and takes away from the power of this institutional field.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
崛起的威权主义与法律全球化初探
摘要:本文探讨了“法律全球化的未来是什么?”在分析法律全球化的前景时,我建议从国家和跨国层面分析最近威权主义的兴起,可以提供重要的见解。我对威权政治的兴起提出了三个相关的看法。首先,威权和半威权政权的兴起,以及民粹主义与威权主义在国家背景下的融合,似乎阻碍了法律的全球化。这可能是因为威权政治的力量主要来自于其对全球化中注定要失败的大众的民粹主义吸引力。为了让这种呼吁继续下去,独裁政客们培养了反全球化的言论和做法。最终结果是摆脱了全球化关系和不同国家法律体系之间的制度联系。然而,这种威权主义在各种不同的国家背景下产生的语法相似性,促使我们反思构成这种相似性的全球化关系。第二,国内和超国家机构中独裁倾向的兴起,特别是以政治和经济紧急状态的名义,可能会带来一定程度的法律统一,从而实现法律全球化。然而,我认为,在这种背景下全球化的本质上是一种工具化的法律版本,需要对“全球化的是什么?”以及它是否可以被恰当地称为“法律”进行更深入的反思。第三,作为第二点的延伸,新自由主义是1980年后法律全球化的广泛政治经济背景。我认为,在新自由主义的经济思维和实践方式下,经济化蔓延到生活的各个领域,并使其他制度环境成为其自身的附属品,这使得国内和国际法律工具化成为可能。这种工具化还包括法律,并剥夺了这一制度领域的权力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Managing Digital Resale in the Era of International Exhaustion The Digital Transformation of Tax Systems Progress, Pitfalls, and Protection in a Danish Context Blockchain and the Right to Good Administration: Adding Blocks to or Blocking of the Globalization of Good Administration? The Risk of Digitalization: Transforming Government into a Digital Leviathan Guilty of Probable Cause: Public Arrest Records and Dignity in the Information Age
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1