Global health curricula in Korean nursing schools: Focusing on the changes since 2015

Sujin Lee, J. Yoon
{"title":"Global health curricula in Korean nursing schools: Focusing on the changes since 2015","authors":"Sujin Lee, J. Yoon","doi":"10.5977/jkasne.2022.28.1.27","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: This study aimed to understand the current status of global health curricula and characteristics in nursing schools, focusing on the changes since 2015.Methods: Data were collected from the websites of 202 nursing schools nationwide in Korea. Global health curricula were analyzed using a structured framework developed by the authors.Results: Among 202 nursing schools, 173 (85.6%) schools offer global health-related courses. Of these, 72 (35.6%) schools offer a ‘Multiculturalism’ course, and 42 (20.8%) schools offer a ‘Global Nursing’ course. Fifty-nine schools (29.2%) offer both courses. Compared to the study findings in 2015, the number of global health-related courses and the percentage of global health-related courses designated as a requirement dramatically increased. An additional analysis of five syllabi of global-health related courses found several differences in the courses’ aims, contents and evaluation methods.Conclusions: Due to social and political changes, nursing schools are more likely to offer global health curricula. However, there is still a lack of consensus on the core contents and approaches of such curricula, necessitating systematic discussions about the core contents and effective learning methods to increase nursing student competency in global health nursing.","PeriodicalId":36262,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Korean Academic Society of Nursing Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Korean Academic Society of Nursing Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5977/jkasne.2022.28.1.27","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to understand the current status of global health curricula and characteristics in nursing schools, focusing on the changes since 2015.Methods: Data were collected from the websites of 202 nursing schools nationwide in Korea. Global health curricula were analyzed using a structured framework developed by the authors.Results: Among 202 nursing schools, 173 (85.6%) schools offer global health-related courses. Of these, 72 (35.6%) schools offer a ‘Multiculturalism’ course, and 42 (20.8%) schools offer a ‘Global Nursing’ course. Fifty-nine schools (29.2%) offer both courses. Compared to the study findings in 2015, the number of global health-related courses and the percentage of global health-related courses designated as a requirement dramatically increased. An additional analysis of five syllabi of global-health related courses found several differences in the courses’ aims, contents and evaluation methods.Conclusions: Due to social and political changes, nursing schools are more likely to offer global health curricula. However, there is still a lack of consensus on the core contents and approaches of such curricula, necessitating systematic discussions about the core contents and effective learning methods to increase nursing student competency in global health nursing.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
韩国护理学校的全球健康课程:关注2015年以来的变化
目的:本研究旨在了解全球护理学校健康课程的现状和特点,重点关注2015年以来的变化。方法:收集全国202所护理学校的网站资料。使用作者开发的结构化框架对全球卫生课程进行了分析。结果:202所护理学校中,173所(85.6%)开设全球健康相关课程。其中,72所(35.6%)学校提供“多元文化”课程,42所(20.8%)学校提供“全球护理”课程。59所学校(29.2%)同时提供这两门课程。与2015年的研究结果相比,全球健康相关课程的数量和指定为必修课程的全球健康相关课程的百分比大幅增加。对五门全球卫生相关课程教学大纲的进一步分析发现,这些课程的目标、内容和评价方法存在一些差异。结论:由于社会和政治的变化,护理学校更有可能提供全球卫生课程。然而,对于全球健康护理课程的核心内容和学习方法仍缺乏共识,需要对核心内容和有效的学习方法进行系统的探讨,以提高护理学生在全球健康护理中的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
期刊最新文献
Factors related to the organizational silence of Korean nurses: A systematic review and meta-analysis Factors affecting senior nursing students’ willingness to palliative care Development of a case-based nursing education program using generative artificial intelligence The mediating effect of grit and social support on the relationship between self-determination and life satisfaction in nursing students Predictors of parental behavioral intentions for vaccinating their children against COVID-19 as determined by the modified theory of planned behavior
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1