“We are Still Running around with the Same Rules, but We are Not the Same We Were 20 Years Ago” – Exploring the Perceptions of Youth Justice Professionals on Secure Training Centres

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2022-02-17 DOI:10.1080/0886571x.2022.2038340
Claire Paterson-Young
{"title":"“We are Still Running around with the Same Rules, but We are Not the Same We Were 20 Years Ago” – Exploring the Perceptions of Youth Justice Professionals on Secure Training Centres","authors":"Claire Paterson-Young","doi":"10.1080/0886571x.2022.2038340","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Debates on the incarceration of children in residential settings has been ongoing for decades, with the United Nations Convention of the Rights of the Child and academic literature acknowledging that custody is not in the best interest of the child. In England, the problems associated with placing children in custody have been documents since 1999 and, nearly twenty years later, a BBC Panorama exposed the abuse of children at the hands of staff in the same Secure Training Center. This paper examines staff’ and other professional perceptions as to the purpose and direction of Secure Training Centers, youth custodial environments, through thematic analysis of semi-structured interviews with staff members employed in Secure Training Centers and other professionals in the youth justice sector (i.e. Social Workers, Youth Offending Officers and Managers). It seeks to identify perceptions on the purpose and challenge of Secure Training Centers in supporting children who have experiences adverse circumstances resulting in trauma. It illustrates the need for embedding trauma-informed “Child First” approaches in Secure Training Centers, and youth custodial environments globally, to enable staff to adequately support children to build empowering relationships.","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0886571x.2022.2038340","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Debates on the incarceration of children in residential settings has been ongoing for decades, with the United Nations Convention of the Rights of the Child and academic literature acknowledging that custody is not in the best interest of the child. In England, the problems associated with placing children in custody have been documents since 1999 and, nearly twenty years later, a BBC Panorama exposed the abuse of children at the hands of staff in the same Secure Training Center. This paper examines staff’ and other professional perceptions as to the purpose and direction of Secure Training Centers, youth custodial environments, through thematic analysis of semi-structured interviews with staff members employed in Secure Training Centers and other professionals in the youth justice sector (i.e. Social Workers, Youth Offending Officers and Managers). It seeks to identify perceptions on the purpose and challenge of Secure Training Centers in supporting children who have experiences adverse circumstances resulting in trauma. It illustrates the need for embedding trauma-informed “Child First” approaches in Secure Training Centers, and youth custodial environments globally, to enable staff to adequately support children to build empowering relationships.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“我们仍在遵循同样的规则,但我们与20年前不同”——探索青年司法专业人员对安全培训中心的看法
摘要关于在寄宿环境中监禁儿童的争论已经持续了几十年,《联合国儿童权利公约》和学术文献都承认监护权不符合儿童的最佳利益。在英格兰,自1999年以来,与拘留儿童有关的问题一直是文件,近20年后,英国广播公司的《全景》揭露了同一安全培训中心工作人员虐待儿童的行为。本文通过对受雇于安全培训中心的工作人员和青年司法部门的其他专业人员(即社会工作者、青年罪犯和管理人员)进行半结构化访谈的主题分析,研究了工作人员和其他专业人员对安全培训中心、青年拘留环境的目的和方向的看法。它试图确定人们对安全培训中心在支持经历了导致创伤的不利环境的儿童方面的目的和挑战的看法。它表明,有必要将创伤知情的“儿童优先”方法纳入安全培训中心和全球青年监管环境,使工作人员能够充分支持儿童建立赋权关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
期刊最新文献
Intentions to move abroad among medical students: a cross-sectional study to investigate determinants and opinions. The change process questionnaire (CPQ): A psychometric validation. Prevalence and predictors of hand hygiene compliance in clinical, surgical and intensive care unit wards: results of a second cross-sectional study at the Umberto I teaching hospital of Rome. The prevention of medication errors in the home care setting: a scoping review. Differential Costs of Raising Grandchildren on Older Mother-Adult Child Relations in Black and White Families.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1