A snake who eats the devil’s tail: The recursivity of good and evil in the security state

IF 1.7 Q2 COMMUNICATION Media War and Conflict Pub Date : 2020-12-01 DOI:10.1177/1750635219846021
N. Baker, Nathan P. Jones
{"title":"A snake who eats the devil’s tail: The recursivity of good and evil in the security state","authors":"N. Baker, Nathan P. Jones","doi":"10.1177/1750635219846021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Islamic State and Mexican drug ‘cartels’ have been positioned as extreme menaces to the Western world by media and state actors despite their inability to pose existential threats to the US. These groups deftly facilitate such representations through barbaric violence which security and information sharing apparatuses uptake and amplify. The ‘good’ neoliberal security state combats and inflates these ‘evil’ threats which, in turn, empowers purveyors of security in a deregulated environment. The authors interrogate this problem through the lens of negative utopias presented in speculative fiction to understand the implications for state and society. Projected representations of evil as an existential threat present a conflicted vision of the future manipulated by political and media actors with dire consequences for democratic ideals. National security relies on a never-ending cast of foreign threats that legitimize counter-terror actions in the name of moral good. Security institutions persist primarily through the simultaneous representation of a never-ending battle of good and evil. They stand to gain from the existence of extremely violent groups, without legitimate progress towards their eradication. They also bring fantasy into reality through the recursive enactment of good versus evil.","PeriodicalId":45719,"journal":{"name":"Media War and Conflict","volume":"13 1","pages":"468 - 486"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1750635219846021","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Media War and Conflict","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1750635219846021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The Islamic State and Mexican drug ‘cartels’ have been positioned as extreme menaces to the Western world by media and state actors despite their inability to pose existential threats to the US. These groups deftly facilitate such representations through barbaric violence which security and information sharing apparatuses uptake and amplify. The ‘good’ neoliberal security state combats and inflates these ‘evil’ threats which, in turn, empowers purveyors of security in a deregulated environment. The authors interrogate this problem through the lens of negative utopias presented in speculative fiction to understand the implications for state and society. Projected representations of evil as an existential threat present a conflicted vision of the future manipulated by political and media actors with dire consequences for democratic ideals. National security relies on a never-ending cast of foreign threats that legitimize counter-terror actions in the name of moral good. Security institutions persist primarily through the simultaneous representation of a never-ending battle of good and evil. They stand to gain from the existence of extremely violent groups, without legitimate progress towards their eradication. They also bring fantasy into reality through the recursive enactment of good versus evil.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
吃魔鬼尾巴的蛇:安全状态中善恶的递归性
伊斯兰国和墨西哥贩毒集团被媒体和国家行为者定位为对西方世界的极端威胁,尽管它们无法对美国构成生存威胁。这些组织通过安全和信息共享机构吸收和放大的野蛮暴力,巧妙地为这种表现提供了便利。“好”的新自由主义安全国家打击并扩大了这些“邪恶”的威胁,而这些威胁反过来又赋予了解除管制环境中的安全提供者权力。作者通过思辨小说中出现的负面乌托邦的镜头来质疑这个问题,以理解其对国家和社会的影响。将邪恶视为一种生存威胁的投射呈现了一种由政治和媒体行为者操纵的冲突的未来愿景,对民主理想产生了可怕的后果。国家安全依赖于无休止的外国威胁,这些威胁以道德利益的名义使反恐行动合法化。安全机构的存在主要是通过同时表现一场无休止的善与恶之战。如果在根除极端暴力团体方面没有合法进展,他们将从这些团体的存在中获益。他们还通过善与恶的递归演绎将幻想带入现实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Media War and Conflict
Media War and Conflict COMMUNICATION-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
15.40%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: Media, War & Conflict is a major new international, peer-reviewed journal that maps the shifting arena of war, conflict and terrorism in an intensively and extensively mediated age. It will explore cultural, political and technological transformations in media-military relations, journalistic practices, and new media, and their impact on policy, publics, and outcomes of warfare. Media, War & Conflict is the first journal to be dedicated to this field. It will publish substantial research articles, shorter pieces, book reviews, letters and commentary, and will include an images section devoted to visual aspects of war and conflict.
期刊最新文献
The Lernaean Hydra on the internet: Deplatformization-resistant media ecosystem of the Islamic State Vertical interference: video, drone witnessing, and the myth of precision targeting YouTube discourse of the Oting massacre in Nagaland: investigating affiliations, sentiments and Naga identity negotiation in YouTube comments Solidarity with Ukrainian war refugees in Polanders’ epistolary narratives (based on the study of southern and eastern regions of Poland) Ideology and cognitive stereotypes in media representation of the Russia–Ukraine conflict
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1