Secondhand smoke exposure inside the house and low birth weight in Indonesia: Evidence from a demographic and health survey

Q3 Medicine Population Medicine Pub Date : 2023-06-30 DOI:10.18332/popmed/168620
H. Andriani, N. Rahmawati, A. Ahsan, D. Kusuma
{"title":"Secondhand smoke exposure inside the house and low\nbirth weight in Indonesia: Evidence from a demographic\nand health survey","authors":"H. Andriani, N. Rahmawati, A. Ahsan, D. Kusuma","doi":"10.18332/popmed/168620","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION Secondhand smoke (SHS) exposure during pregnancy among non-smoking women is associated with mortality and morbidity risks in infants. However, little is known about SHS inside the house and low birth weight in newborns. This study aims to assess the prevalence, level, and frequency of SHS exposure inside the house and investigate their associations with low birth weight. METHODS We used the Indonesian Demographic and Health Survey (IDHS) 2017, a large-scale, nationally representative survey. Women aged 15–49 years who had given birth in the last five years before the study and their husbands were interviewed (n=19935). Two dependent variables included low birth weight (LBW) and birth weight. RESULTS In all, 78.4% of mothers were exposed to SHS inside the home, of whom 7.2% had LBW children. Compared to non-exposed to SHS mothers, those exposed to SHS were younger, had their first birth before the age of 20 years, were married, lower educated, non-workers, lived in rural areas, were grand multipara, had pollution from cooking fuel, cooked in a separate building, and had a higher risk of delivering a lower birth weight (AOR=1.16; 95% CI: 1.02– 1.33). CONCLUSIONS Exposure to SHS inside the home was significantly associated with LBW. Given the high prevalence of smoking, relevant policies and health promotion are needed. Research Paper | Population Medicine Popul. Med. 2023;5(June):17 https://doi.org/10.18332/popmed/168620 2 basis6. Based on Demographic and Health Survey data collected between 2008 and 2013, from 30 lowand middle-income countries (LMICs), daily SHS exposure accounted for a more significant population-attributable fraction of stillbirths than active smoking, which was 14% in Indonesia. This number is the highest among the other 30 LMICs7. Indonesia has compiled various regulations governing public protection from the dangers of exposure to cigarette smoke. One of them is the adoption of no-smoking zones in various public places and workplaces, especially in schools and hospitals. However, the World Health Organization (WHO) notes that regulations regarding smoke-free areas in public areas in Indonesia are still relatively low compared to other South-East Asian countries, and in accordance with the geographical distribution as well as socioeconomic disparity, in urban settings, the wealthier and more educated population were more likely to adopt a smoke-free policy8. Given the implications for child mortality, a significant reduction in the prevalence of LBW is necessary to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals, and there is a similar need to strengthen the implementation of the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) of the WHO in all countries9. Only a few robust studies examined a clear association between exposure to SHS inside the house and birth outcomes, especially in Indonesia10,11. This study contributes to filling the knowledge gap in SHS exposure inside the house and low birth weight in Indonesia by using the evidence of large-scale population-based data and taking into account SHS frequency and LBW, neither of which have been presented in previous studies. This study assesses the prevalence, level, and frequency of SHS exposure inside the house and their associations with birth outcomes. METHODS Data sources We used data from the latest 2017 Indonesia Demographic and Health Survey (IDHS) survey, a nationally representative, large-scale, and repeated cross-sectional household survey collecting population, health, and nutrition data. All evermarried women aged 15–49 years who had given birth in the last five years before the survey in sampled households are eligible for an interview using a standard self-reported questionnaire12. Women were chosen to give birth during the last five years before the survey to prevent bias in memory recall from mothers. The total sample size in the study was 19935. Respondents in the 2017 IDHS read a written informed consent statement before each interview. The statement also included voluntary participation, refusal to answer questions or termination of participation at any time, and confidentiality of identity and information. Measurement Two main independent variables were the exposure to SHS inside the house and the frequency of SHS exposure. The information about SHS inside the house is obtained from two types of 2017 IDHS questionnaires: the household questionnaire and the women’s questionnaire. The information regarding SHS exposure at home was derived from the question at the household questionnaire: ‘How often does anyone smoke inside your house? (daily, weekly, monthly, less than monthly, never)?’. To ascertain whether the mother in the household smoked or not, we linked smoking data from the household questionnaire to the women’s questionnaire through their unique identifier codes. In the women’s questionnaire, there are two questions related to smoking habits: 1) ‘Do you currently smoke?’ (every day, sometimes, not at all); 2) ‘In the past, have you ever smoked?’. (every day, sometimes, not at all.) All household members and mothers who answered ‘never’ or ‘not at all’ were included in the ‘non-exposed’ SHS group. Meanwhile, the SHS ‘exposed’ group consists of: 1) household members who do not smoke, but the mother smokes; 2) household members who smoke, but the mother does not smoke; and 3) all household members and mothers who answered ‘daily, weekly, monthly, less than monthly, every day, sometimes’. Then, a binary variable (not exposed vs exposed) was created to measure exposure to SHS inside the house, where one or more adults smoke commercial cigarettes, cigars (including kretek cigarettes or unfiltered cigarettes of Indonesian origin), and other country-specific smoking products (including pipes, cigars, shisha, chewing tobacco, and chewing betel nut with tobacco). The information regarding SHS exposure frequency at home was derived from the question on the household questionnaire in the 2017 IDHS: ‘How often does anyone smoke inside your house?’ (daily, weekly, monthly, less than monthly, never). SHS frequency was then classified as: not exposed, less than once a month, monthly, weekly, and daily. Two outcome variables related to the self-reported birth outcomes are LBW and birth weight. We treated LBW (<2500 g; compared to ≥2500 g) as a categorical variable. Birth weight (g) was treated as a continuous variable. Potential covariates Demographic and socioeconomic characteristics included maternal age, age at first birth, marital status, maternal education level, family size, mother’s occupation, husband’s education level, residence (urban or rural), parity, birth interval, birth order, wealth index, cooking fuel, and kitchen location. The wealth index is a composite measure of a household’s cumulative living standard or ownership of selected assets. The resulting combined wealth index has a mean of zero and a standard deviation of one. Once it is obtained, national-level wealth quintiles are obtained by assigning the household score to each de jure household member, ranking each person in the population by their score, and then dividing the ranking into five equal parts, from quintile one (lowest=poorest) to quintile five (highest=wealthiest), each having approximately 20% Research Paper | Population Medicine Popul. Med. 2023;5(June):17 https://doi.org/10.18332/popmed/168620 3 of the population. Cooking fuel consists of electricity or gas, kerosene, coal or lignite, charcoal, and wood or straw (including grass, shrubs, and plant residues). Clean cooking fuels include electricity or gas, while pollutant cooking fuels include kerosene, coal or lignite, charcoal, and wood or straw (including grass, shrubs, and plant residues). Statistical analysis The data were analyzed using SPSS version 25. The proportions and chi-squared tested the differences between SHS exposure and demographic and socioeconomic characteristics inside the house. Logistic regression analyses measured the relative odds of associations between SHS exposure and frequency inside the house and LBW. The general linear model assessed the relationships between SHS exposure and frequency inside the house and birth weight. All multivariable models were used to control for covariates. Backward elimination as the variable selection procedure retained critical confounding variables, resulting in a slightly richer model. The overall model was also evaluated using the goodness-of-fit test and the likelihood ratio test. RESULTS The characteristics of the participants are presented in Table 1. In all, 78.4% of the mothers were exposed to SHS in the household, with 7.2% of those with LBW being exposed to SHS. Compared with non-SHS exposure mothers, mothers exposed to SHS were aged 15–24 years, had their first birth before 20 years of age, were married, had a lower education, were non-workers, lived in a rural area, had grand multiparas, had pollution from cooking fuel, and cooked in a separate building. All the indicators were statistically significant at p<0.05, except for the husband’s occupation and birth interval, which were not different in exposure to SHS. Table 2 shows that the mean birth weight was significantly associated with SHS exposure inside the house. After adjusting for the covariates, mothers exposed to SHS had children with a mean birth weight of 71.6 g (p<0.01) lower than that of mothers who were not exposed to SHS. Compared to non-SHS exposure, mothers who were exposed to SHS showed a 1.16-fold increase in the odds of having LBW children (AOR=1.16; 95% CI: 1.02–1.33, p<0.05). For SHS exposure frequency, mothers exposed to SHS daily had children with a mean birth weight of 63.4 g (p<0.01) lower than that of mothers who were not exposed to SHS. Compared to non-SHS exposure, mothers who were exposed to SHS weekly and daily showed an increase in the odds of having LBW children (AOR=1.33; 95% CI: 1.03–1.71, p<0.05 and AOR=1.18; 95% CI: 1.01–1.38, p<0","PeriodicalId":33626,"journal":{"name":"Population Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Population Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18332/popmed/168620","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

INTRODUCTION Secondhand smoke (SHS) exposure during pregnancy among non-smoking women is associated with mortality and morbidity risks in infants. However, little is known about SHS inside the house and low birth weight in newborns. This study aims to assess the prevalence, level, and frequency of SHS exposure inside the house and investigate their associations with low birth weight. METHODS We used the Indonesian Demographic and Health Survey (IDHS) 2017, a large-scale, nationally representative survey. Women aged 15–49 years who had given birth in the last five years before the study and their husbands were interviewed (n=19935). Two dependent variables included low birth weight (LBW) and birth weight. RESULTS In all, 78.4% of mothers were exposed to SHS inside the home, of whom 7.2% had LBW children. Compared to non-exposed to SHS mothers, those exposed to SHS were younger, had their first birth before the age of 20 years, were married, lower educated, non-workers, lived in rural areas, were grand multipara, had pollution from cooking fuel, cooked in a separate building, and had a higher risk of delivering a lower birth weight (AOR=1.16; 95% CI: 1.02– 1.33). CONCLUSIONS Exposure to SHS inside the home was significantly associated with LBW. Given the high prevalence of smoking, relevant policies and health promotion are needed. Research Paper | Population Medicine Popul. Med. 2023;5(June):17 https://doi.org/10.18332/popmed/168620 2 basis6. Based on Demographic and Health Survey data collected between 2008 and 2013, from 30 lowand middle-income countries (LMICs), daily SHS exposure accounted for a more significant population-attributable fraction of stillbirths than active smoking, which was 14% in Indonesia. This number is the highest among the other 30 LMICs7. Indonesia has compiled various regulations governing public protection from the dangers of exposure to cigarette smoke. One of them is the adoption of no-smoking zones in various public places and workplaces, especially in schools and hospitals. However, the World Health Organization (WHO) notes that regulations regarding smoke-free areas in public areas in Indonesia are still relatively low compared to other South-East Asian countries, and in accordance with the geographical distribution as well as socioeconomic disparity, in urban settings, the wealthier and more educated population were more likely to adopt a smoke-free policy8. Given the implications for child mortality, a significant reduction in the prevalence of LBW is necessary to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals, and there is a similar need to strengthen the implementation of the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) of the WHO in all countries9. Only a few robust studies examined a clear association between exposure to SHS inside the house and birth outcomes, especially in Indonesia10,11. This study contributes to filling the knowledge gap in SHS exposure inside the house and low birth weight in Indonesia by using the evidence of large-scale population-based data and taking into account SHS frequency and LBW, neither of which have been presented in previous studies. This study assesses the prevalence, level, and frequency of SHS exposure inside the house and their associations with birth outcomes. METHODS Data sources We used data from the latest 2017 Indonesia Demographic and Health Survey (IDHS) survey, a nationally representative, large-scale, and repeated cross-sectional household survey collecting population, health, and nutrition data. All evermarried women aged 15–49 years who had given birth in the last five years before the survey in sampled households are eligible for an interview using a standard self-reported questionnaire12. Women were chosen to give birth during the last five years before the survey to prevent bias in memory recall from mothers. The total sample size in the study was 19935. Respondents in the 2017 IDHS read a written informed consent statement before each interview. The statement also included voluntary participation, refusal to answer questions or termination of participation at any time, and confidentiality of identity and information. Measurement Two main independent variables were the exposure to SHS inside the house and the frequency of SHS exposure. The information about SHS inside the house is obtained from two types of 2017 IDHS questionnaires: the household questionnaire and the women’s questionnaire. The information regarding SHS exposure at home was derived from the question at the household questionnaire: ‘How often does anyone smoke inside your house? (daily, weekly, monthly, less than monthly, never)?’. To ascertain whether the mother in the household smoked or not, we linked smoking data from the household questionnaire to the women’s questionnaire through their unique identifier codes. In the women’s questionnaire, there are two questions related to smoking habits: 1) ‘Do you currently smoke?’ (every day, sometimes, not at all); 2) ‘In the past, have you ever smoked?’. (every day, sometimes, not at all.) All household members and mothers who answered ‘never’ or ‘not at all’ were included in the ‘non-exposed’ SHS group. Meanwhile, the SHS ‘exposed’ group consists of: 1) household members who do not smoke, but the mother smokes; 2) household members who smoke, but the mother does not smoke; and 3) all household members and mothers who answered ‘daily, weekly, monthly, less than monthly, every day, sometimes’. Then, a binary variable (not exposed vs exposed) was created to measure exposure to SHS inside the house, where one or more adults smoke commercial cigarettes, cigars (including kretek cigarettes or unfiltered cigarettes of Indonesian origin), and other country-specific smoking products (including pipes, cigars, shisha, chewing tobacco, and chewing betel nut with tobacco). The information regarding SHS exposure frequency at home was derived from the question on the household questionnaire in the 2017 IDHS: ‘How often does anyone smoke inside your house?’ (daily, weekly, monthly, less than monthly, never). SHS frequency was then classified as: not exposed, less than once a month, monthly, weekly, and daily. Two outcome variables related to the self-reported birth outcomes are LBW and birth weight. We treated LBW (<2500 g; compared to ≥2500 g) as a categorical variable. Birth weight (g) was treated as a continuous variable. Potential covariates Demographic and socioeconomic characteristics included maternal age, age at first birth, marital status, maternal education level, family size, mother’s occupation, husband’s education level, residence (urban or rural), parity, birth interval, birth order, wealth index, cooking fuel, and kitchen location. The wealth index is a composite measure of a household’s cumulative living standard or ownership of selected assets. The resulting combined wealth index has a mean of zero and a standard deviation of one. Once it is obtained, national-level wealth quintiles are obtained by assigning the household score to each de jure household member, ranking each person in the population by their score, and then dividing the ranking into five equal parts, from quintile one (lowest=poorest) to quintile five (highest=wealthiest), each having approximately 20% Research Paper | Population Medicine Popul. Med. 2023;5(June):17 https://doi.org/10.18332/popmed/168620 3 of the population. Cooking fuel consists of electricity or gas, kerosene, coal or lignite, charcoal, and wood or straw (including grass, shrubs, and plant residues). Clean cooking fuels include electricity or gas, while pollutant cooking fuels include kerosene, coal or lignite, charcoal, and wood or straw (including grass, shrubs, and plant residues). Statistical analysis The data were analyzed using SPSS version 25. The proportions and chi-squared tested the differences between SHS exposure and demographic and socioeconomic characteristics inside the house. Logistic regression analyses measured the relative odds of associations between SHS exposure and frequency inside the house and LBW. The general linear model assessed the relationships between SHS exposure and frequency inside the house and birth weight. All multivariable models were used to control for covariates. Backward elimination as the variable selection procedure retained critical confounding variables, resulting in a slightly richer model. The overall model was also evaluated using the goodness-of-fit test and the likelihood ratio test. RESULTS The characteristics of the participants are presented in Table 1. In all, 78.4% of the mothers were exposed to SHS in the household, with 7.2% of those with LBW being exposed to SHS. Compared with non-SHS exposure mothers, mothers exposed to SHS were aged 15–24 years, had their first birth before 20 years of age, were married, had a lower education, were non-workers, lived in a rural area, had grand multiparas, had pollution from cooking fuel, and cooked in a separate building. All the indicators were statistically significant at p<0.05, except for the husband’s occupation and birth interval, which were not different in exposure to SHS. Table 2 shows that the mean birth weight was significantly associated with SHS exposure inside the house. After adjusting for the covariates, mothers exposed to SHS had children with a mean birth weight of 71.6 g (p<0.01) lower than that of mothers who were not exposed to SHS. Compared to non-SHS exposure, mothers who were exposed to SHS showed a 1.16-fold increase in the odds of having LBW children (AOR=1.16; 95% CI: 1.02–1.33, p<0.05). For SHS exposure frequency, mothers exposed to SHS daily had children with a mean birth weight of 63.4 g (p<0.01) lower than that of mothers who were not exposed to SHS. Compared to non-SHS exposure, mothers who were exposed to SHS weekly and daily showed an increase in the odds of having LBW children (AOR=1.33; 95% CI: 1.03–1.71, p<0.05 and AOR=1.18; 95% CI: 1.01–1.38, p<0
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印尼室内二手烟暴露与低出生体重:来自人口和健康调查的证据
引言不吸烟妇女在怀孕期间接触二手烟与婴儿的死亡率和发病风险有关。然而,人们对家里的SHS和新生儿的低出生体重知之甚少。本研究旨在评估家庭内SHS暴露的患病率、水平和频率,并调查它们与低出生体重的关系。方法我们使用了2017年印度尼西亚人口与健康调查(IDHS),这是一项具有全国代表性的大规模调查。对在研究前五年内分娩的15-49岁女性及其丈夫进行了访谈(n=19935)。两个因变量包括低出生体重(LBW)和出生体重。结果78.4%的母亲在家中接触过SHS,其中7.2%的母亲有LBW儿童。与未接触SHS的母亲相比,接触SHS母亲更年轻,在20岁前第一次分娩,已婚,受教育程度较低,非工人,居住在农村地区,是多胞胎,有烹饪燃料污染,在单独的建筑中烹饪,并且分娩低出生体重的风险更高(AOR=1.16;95%置信区间:1.02-1.33)。结论在家中接触SHS与LBW显著相关。鉴于吸烟率很高,需要制定相关政策并促进健康。研究论文|人口医学民粹主义。Med.2023;5(6月):17https://doi.org/10.18332/popmed/1686202基础6。根据2008年至2013年间从30个中低收入国家收集的人口与健康调查数据,与印度尼西亚14%的主动吸烟相比,每天接触SHS在死产中所占的人口比例更大。这一数字是其他30个LMICs7中最高的。印度尼西亚制定了各种条例,管理公众免受香烟烟雾危害。其中之一是在各种公共场所和工作场所设立禁烟区,特别是在学校和医院。然而,世界卫生组织(世界卫生组织)指出,与其他东南亚国家相比,印度尼西亚公共区域无烟区的规定仍然相对较低,根据地理分布和社会经济差异,在城市环境中,富裕和受教育程度更高的人口更有可能采取无烟政策8。考虑到对儿童死亡率的影响,显著降低LBW的流行率对于实现可持续发展目标是必要的,同样需要加强世界卫生组织《烟草控制框架公约》9在所有国家的执行。只有少数强有力的研究检验了室内暴露于SHS与出生结果之间的明确联系,尤其是在印度尼西亚10,11。这项研究利用大规模人群数据的证据,并考虑到SHS频率和LBW,有助于填补印度尼西亚家庭内SHS暴露和低出生体重方面的知识空白,这两项研究在以前的研究中都没有提出。本研究评估了家庭内SHS暴露的患病率、水平和频率及其与出生结果的关系。方法数据来源我们使用了最新的2017年印度尼西亚人口与健康调查(IDHS)的数据,这是一项具有全国代表性的大规模重复横断面家庭调查,收集人口、健康和营养数据。所有15-49岁的已婚女性,如果在调查前五年内在抽样家庭中生育,都有资格使用标准的自我报告问卷进行访谈12。在调查前的最后五年里,女性被选择分娩,以防止母亲在记忆回忆方面存在偏见。该研究的总样本量为19935。2017年IDHS的受访者在每次访谈前阅读书面知情同意书。声明还包括自愿参与、拒绝回答问题或随时终止参与以及身份和信息保密。测量两个主要自变量是室内SHS暴露和SHS暴露频率。关于室内SHS的信息来自两种类型的2017年IDHS问卷:家庭问卷和女性问卷。关于在家中接触SHS的信息来源于家庭问卷中的问题:“有人多久在你家里吸烟一次?”?(每日、每周、每月、少于每月、从不)?'。为了确定家庭中的母亲是否吸烟,我们通过其唯一的识别码将家庭问卷中的吸烟数据与女性问卷联系起来。 在女性问卷中,有两个问题与吸烟习惯有关:1)“你现在吸烟吗?”(每天,有时,一点也不);2) “过去,你抽过烟吗?”。(每天,有时,一点也不。)所有回答“从不”或“根本不”的家庭成员和母亲都被纳入“未接触”SHS组。同时,SHS“暴露”组包括:1)不吸烟的家庭成员,但母亲吸烟;2) 家庭成员吸烟,但母亲不吸烟;3)所有回答“每天、每周、每月、不到每月、每天、有时”的家庭成员和母亲。然后,创建了一个二元变量(未暴露与暴露),以测量一个或多个成年人在室内吸烟的SHS暴露情况,其中一个或更多成年人吸烟商业香烟、雪茄(包括kretek香烟或印度尼西亚原产的未过滤香烟)和其他特定国家的吸烟产品(包括烟斗、雪茄、水烟、咀嚼烟草和用烟草咀嚼槟榔)。关于SHS在家暴露频率的信息来源于2017年IDHS中的家庭问卷问题:“有人多久在你家里吸烟一次?”(每日、每周、每月、少于每月、从不)。SHS频率被分类为:未暴露、每月少于一次、每月、每周和每天。与自我报告的出生结果相关的两个结果变量是LBW和出生体重。我们将LBW(<2500 g;与≥2500 g相比)作为一个分类变量。出生体重(g)被视为一个连续变量。潜在协变量人口统计学和社会经济特征包括产妇年龄、初产年龄、婚姻状况、产妇教育水平、家庭规模、母亲的职业、丈夫的教育水平、居住地(城市或农村)、产次、出生间隔、出生顺序、财富指数、烹饪燃料和厨房位置。财富指数是衡量一个家庭的累计生活水平或所选资产所有权的综合指标。由此产生的综合财富指数的平均值为零,标准差为一。一旦获得,国家级的财富五分位数是通过将家庭分数分配给每个法律上的家庭成员,根据他们的分数对人口中的每个人进行排名,然后将排名分为五个相等的部分,从一分位数(最低=最穷)到五分位数(最高=最富有),每个部分都有大约20%的研究论文|人口医学民粹主义。Med.2023;5(6月):17https://doi.org/10.18332/popmed/168620人口的3。烹饪燃料包括电力或天然气、煤油、煤或褐煤、木炭、木材或稻草(包括草、灌木和植物残渣)。清洁烹饪燃料包括电力或天然气,而污染烹饪燃料包括煤油、煤或褐煤、木炭、木材或稻草(包括草、灌木和植物残渣)。统计分析数据采用SPSS 25版软件进行分析。比例和卡方检验了SHS暴露与室内人口和社会经济特征之间的差异。Logistic回归分析测量了SHS暴露与室内频率和LBW之间关联的相对几率。一般线性模型评估了SHS暴露与室内频率和出生体重之间的关系。所有多变量模型都用于控制协变量。作为变量选择程序的后向消除保留了关键的混杂变量,从而形成了一个稍微丰富的模型。还使用拟合优度检验和似然比检验对整个模型进行了评估。结果参与者的特征如表1所示。总的来说,78.4%的母亲在家庭中接触过SHS,其中7.2%的LBW母亲接触过SHS。与非SHS暴露母亲相比,接触SHS的母亲年龄在15-24岁之间,在20岁前第一次分娩,已婚,受教育程度较低,非工人,居住在农村地区,有多胎,烹饪燃料污染,在单独的建筑中烹饪。除丈夫的职业和出生间隔外,所有指标均具有统计学意义(p<0.05),这两项指标在接触SHS时没有差异。表2显示,平均出生体重与室内SHS暴露显著相关。校正协变量后,接触SHS的母亲的孩子平均出生体重比未接触SHS母亲的孩子低71.6克(p<0.01)。与非SHS暴露相比,暴露于SHS的母亲生LBW孩子的几率增加了1.16倍(AOR=1.16;95%CI:1.02–1.33,p<0.05)。就SHS暴露频率而言,每天暴露于SHS的母亲生下的孩子的平均出生体重比未暴露于SHS.的母亲低63.4 g(p<0.01)。 与非SHS暴露相比,每周和每天暴露于SHS的母亲生LBW孩子的几率增加(AOR=1.33;95%可信区间:1.03-1.71,p<0.05;AOR=1.18;95%置信区间:1.01-1.38,p<0.01
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Population Medicine
Population Medicine Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
It’s (not) rocket science: public health communication experience as expressed by participants to an international workshop Cholesterol medication adherence and its determinants in community dwelling older adults in India: Evidence from the Longitudinal Ageing Study in India (2017– 2018) Prevalence and factors associated with diabetes, hypertension, and ischemic heart disease and/or stroke multimorbidity in Morocco: Results of a national STEPS survey in 2017 Determinants of nonprescription medicine and first-aid knowledge among primary school health teachers in Phayao Province, Northern Thailand Promoting peace and preparedness: Looking ahead to the 3rd Global Public Health Week
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1