The Indian Nuclear Test in a Global Perspective

IF 0.7 Q3 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Strategic Analysis Pub Date : 2023-03-04 DOI:10.1080/09700161.2023.2203076
K. Subrahmanyam
{"title":"The Indian Nuclear Test in a Global Perspective","authors":"K. Subrahmanyam","doi":"10.1080/09700161.2023.2203076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"T he Pokhran test carried out by the Indian Atomic Energy Commission on 18 May 1974, by and large, evoked predictable reactions. Those countries that had come to accept the conventional wisdom on the issue of nuclear proliferation expressed regrets ranging from mild to profound. Some Third World countries expressed satisfaction but Pakistan reacted very strongly. The Indian Government’s declaration that the test was part of a series to exploit nuclear explosive technology and that India did not intend to manufacture nuclear weapons was accepted by many governments, while others expressed varying kinds of reservations about it. Within the country, we were proud of the achievements of our scientific and technological community and angry at what we considered to be double standards of those who muted their protests about the tests of the five nuclear weapon powers but came out loud against the safe and well-contained test at Pokhran. Since then, the declaration that this country does not intend to manufacture weapons has been repeated in many forums, both inside and outside the country. At the same time, India’s right to conduct peaceful underground explosions for developing technology has been reasserted and it has been pointed out that this country did not break any treaty but had reserved the right to carry out these explosions since 1967, when it had protested against the prohibition of such peaceful explosions under the Non-Proliferation Treaty. This was one of the reasons why India abstained from that treaty. It has been highlighted that in the matter of development of nuclear energy, India had a long and independent tradition and had taken a long-range view about the future developments in the constructive uses of nuclear energy. As early as 12 March 1944, Dr Homi Jehangir Bhabha, in a letter written to the Sir Dorabji Tata Trust proposing the setting up of an institute for fundamental research, prophesied: ‘When nuclear energy has been successfully applied for power production, in say, a couple of decades from now, India will not have to look abroad for its experts but will find them ready at hand’. India was among the first eight countries where an Atomic Energy Commission was set up. In the first Atoms for Peace Conference in Geneva, Dr Bhabha predicted the coming in of fusion power in the next two to three decades. In Asia, India set up its first research reactor, Apsara, in 1956 ahead of China and Japan. Similarly, the first plutonium separation facility outside the nuclear weapons States was also established in India entirely through indigenous efforts. India also formulated a long-term three-stage strategy for the development of nuclear","PeriodicalId":45012,"journal":{"name":"Strategic Analysis","volume":"47 1","pages":"186 - 201"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Strategic Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09700161.2023.2203076","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

T he Pokhran test carried out by the Indian Atomic Energy Commission on 18 May 1974, by and large, evoked predictable reactions. Those countries that had come to accept the conventional wisdom on the issue of nuclear proliferation expressed regrets ranging from mild to profound. Some Third World countries expressed satisfaction but Pakistan reacted very strongly. The Indian Government’s declaration that the test was part of a series to exploit nuclear explosive technology and that India did not intend to manufacture nuclear weapons was accepted by many governments, while others expressed varying kinds of reservations about it. Within the country, we were proud of the achievements of our scientific and technological community and angry at what we considered to be double standards of those who muted their protests about the tests of the five nuclear weapon powers but came out loud against the safe and well-contained test at Pokhran. Since then, the declaration that this country does not intend to manufacture weapons has been repeated in many forums, both inside and outside the country. At the same time, India’s right to conduct peaceful underground explosions for developing technology has been reasserted and it has been pointed out that this country did not break any treaty but had reserved the right to carry out these explosions since 1967, when it had protested against the prohibition of such peaceful explosions under the Non-Proliferation Treaty. This was one of the reasons why India abstained from that treaty. It has been highlighted that in the matter of development of nuclear energy, India had a long and independent tradition and had taken a long-range view about the future developments in the constructive uses of nuclear energy. As early as 12 March 1944, Dr Homi Jehangir Bhabha, in a letter written to the Sir Dorabji Tata Trust proposing the setting up of an institute for fundamental research, prophesied: ‘When nuclear energy has been successfully applied for power production, in say, a couple of decades from now, India will not have to look abroad for its experts but will find them ready at hand’. India was among the first eight countries where an Atomic Energy Commission was set up. In the first Atoms for Peace Conference in Geneva, Dr Bhabha predicted the coming in of fusion power in the next two to three decades. In Asia, India set up its first research reactor, Apsara, in 1956 ahead of China and Japan. Similarly, the first plutonium separation facility outside the nuclear weapons States was also established in India entirely through indigenous efforts. India also formulated a long-term three-stage strategy for the development of nuclear
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全球视野下的印度核试验
印度原子能委员会于1974年5月18日进行的波克兰试验大体上引起了可预见的反应。那些已经接受关于核扩散问题的传统智慧的国家表示了从轻微到深刻的遗憾。一些第三世界国家表示满意,但巴基斯坦的反应非常强烈。印度政府宣布,这次试验是利用核爆炸技术的一系列试验的一部分,印度不打算制造核武器,这一声明得到许多政府的接受,而另一些政府则对此表示不同的保留意见。在国内,我们为我国科学和技术界的成就感到自豪,并对我们认为是双重标准的人感到愤怒,他们对五个核武器大国的试验不表示抗议,但却大声反对在波赫兰进行安全和密封良好的试验。自那时以来,该国不打算制造武器的声明在该国国内外的许多论坛上一再重复。与此同时,印度为发展技术进行和平地下爆炸的权利得到了重申,并指出,印度没有违反任何条约,而是自1967年以来保留了进行这些爆炸的权利,当时印度曾抗议《不扩散条约》禁止这种和平爆炸。这是印度对该条约投弃权票的原因之一。有人强调指出,在发展核能问题上,印度具有悠久和独立的传统,并对建设性利用核能的未来发展持长远的看法。早在1944年3月12日,霍米·贾汗吉尔·巴巴博士就在给多拉吉·塔塔爵士信托基金的一封信中,提议建立一个基础研究机构,他预言说:“当核能成功地应用于发电时,比如说,几十年后,印度将不必向国外寻找专家,而是会发现他们随时都在手边。”印度是最早成立原子能委员会的八个国家之一。在日内瓦举行的第一届原子和平会议上,Bhabha博士预测核聚变将在未来二三十年内出现。在亚洲,印度于1956年先于中国和日本建立了第一个研究反应堆Apsara。同样,核武器国家以外的第一个钚分离设施也是完全通过本国努力在印度建立的。印度还制定了核发展的长期三阶段战略
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Strategic Analysis
Strategic Analysis INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
82
期刊最新文献
Comprehending NJ 9842 and the Region Beyond Iran as a Regional Power: More Constraints Than Flexibility Maoist Insurgency, State and People: Overlooked Issues and Unaddressed Grievances The South Asia-East Asia Linkage Process: Approached from the Perspective of President Joe Biden’s Administration The Enduring Partition and the Insider-Outsider Debate
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1