Assisting and Empowering Women Facing Natural Disasters: Drawing From Security Council Resolution 1325

Payal Shah
{"title":"Assisting and Empowering Women Facing Natural Disasters: Drawing From Security Council Resolution 1325","authors":"Payal Shah","doi":"10.7916/CJGL.V15I3.2529","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the wake of the tsunami that hit the coastal communities of the Indian Ocean, images of women were splashed over the media's reports of the catastrophe. But while sympathy for women has garnered a great deal of aid, \"[b]eyond the camera lens in the follow-up policies ... there is a trend for women to be rendered almost invisible.\" (1) Reports by women's groups streaming in from all over the region reflect the same message--women were among the hardest hit by the tsunami, and women continue to be the most marginalized in relief efforts. (2) While the relative lack of women-specific initiatives in the tsunami effort arguably could be attributed to the cultural norms of the region and the particular nature of the disaster there, a broader look at disasters worldwide shows that women's needs and abilities are systemically ignored in rehabilitation and restoration efforts. (3) Although this trend has been recognized by international organizations ranging from the United Nations (U.N.) General Assembly, (4) the U.N. Population Fund (UNFPA), (5) the Committee for the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW Committee), (6) the U.N. Office for International Strategy for Disaster Reduction (ISDR), (7) the International Labor Organization (ILO), (8) and the European Union (EU), (9) there is yet to be a binding global initiative that explicitly calls for gender-mainstreaming in disaster prevention and reconstruction efforts. As a result, when the time comes for nations to respond quickly and efficiently to disasters, the lessons learned in gender-sensitivity are lost in the tumult once again. While gender issues are sidelined in disaster contexts, however, this is not the case in other crisis situations. In 2000, the U.N. Security Council unanimously passed Resolution 1325 (1325), which \"stress[es] the importance of [women's] equal participation and full involvement in all efforts for the maintenance and promotion of peace and security\" (10) and \"[r]ecogniz[es] the urgent need to mainstream a gender perspective into peacekeeping operation.\" (11) The resolution calls for increased representation of women at all decision-making levels in conflict prevention, management, and resolution; attention to the specific protection of the needs of women in conflict, including refugees; increased support for women peace-builders; refusal to allow impunity for crimes against women, including gender-based violence; and combination of a gender perspective in U.N. operations, post-conflict processes, and Reporting and Security Council Missions. (12) Through the resolution, women must be integrated in reconstruction efforts, and local women's initiatives in maintaining peace and security must be supported by the U.N. and government officials. (13) Some aid groups have drawn on 1325 in their calls for a gendered perspective in disaster relief post-tsunami, but explicit support for this connection has not yet been articulated. This Article draws a connection between the interests protected by 1325 and those that would be protected by a similarly binding resolution for women in disaster situations, and argues for the realization of such an international agreement. Part II of this Article urges women's rights activists to acknowledge the capacity and the desirability of a binding Security Council resolution for gender-mainstreaming and female participation in disaster prevention and aid work. Further, this section argues for the recognition of disasters as a \"threat to the peace\" that can be reduced through the symbolic and legal powers of a Security Council resolution. Part III then establishes why the Security Council itself should seek such a resolution, based on the centrality of disaster relief in ensuring the success of core Security Council goals, such as resolving conflict and fostering sustainable development. Part V shows how gender-mainstreaming in natural disasters would further the goals of the Security Council; indeed, failing to pursue gender-mainstreaming would actually undermine the Security Council's objectives, particularly those relating to 1325. …","PeriodicalId":84468,"journal":{"name":"Columbia journal of gender and law","volume":"15 1","pages":"711"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Columbia journal of gender and law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7916/CJGL.V15I3.2529","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In the wake of the tsunami that hit the coastal communities of the Indian Ocean, images of women were splashed over the media's reports of the catastrophe. But while sympathy for women has garnered a great deal of aid, "[b]eyond the camera lens in the follow-up policies ... there is a trend for women to be rendered almost invisible." (1) Reports by women's groups streaming in from all over the region reflect the same message--women were among the hardest hit by the tsunami, and women continue to be the most marginalized in relief efforts. (2) While the relative lack of women-specific initiatives in the tsunami effort arguably could be attributed to the cultural norms of the region and the particular nature of the disaster there, a broader look at disasters worldwide shows that women's needs and abilities are systemically ignored in rehabilitation and restoration efforts. (3) Although this trend has been recognized by international organizations ranging from the United Nations (U.N.) General Assembly, (4) the U.N. Population Fund (UNFPA), (5) the Committee for the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW Committee), (6) the U.N. Office for International Strategy for Disaster Reduction (ISDR), (7) the International Labor Organization (ILO), (8) and the European Union (EU), (9) there is yet to be a binding global initiative that explicitly calls for gender-mainstreaming in disaster prevention and reconstruction efforts. As a result, when the time comes for nations to respond quickly and efficiently to disasters, the lessons learned in gender-sensitivity are lost in the tumult once again. While gender issues are sidelined in disaster contexts, however, this is not the case in other crisis situations. In 2000, the U.N. Security Council unanimously passed Resolution 1325 (1325), which "stress[es] the importance of [women's] equal participation and full involvement in all efforts for the maintenance and promotion of peace and security" (10) and "[r]ecogniz[es] the urgent need to mainstream a gender perspective into peacekeeping operation." (11) The resolution calls for increased representation of women at all decision-making levels in conflict prevention, management, and resolution; attention to the specific protection of the needs of women in conflict, including refugees; increased support for women peace-builders; refusal to allow impunity for crimes against women, including gender-based violence; and combination of a gender perspective in U.N. operations, post-conflict processes, and Reporting and Security Council Missions. (12) Through the resolution, women must be integrated in reconstruction efforts, and local women's initiatives in maintaining peace and security must be supported by the U.N. and government officials. (13) Some aid groups have drawn on 1325 in their calls for a gendered perspective in disaster relief post-tsunami, but explicit support for this connection has not yet been articulated. This Article draws a connection between the interests protected by 1325 and those that would be protected by a similarly binding resolution for women in disaster situations, and argues for the realization of such an international agreement. Part II of this Article urges women's rights activists to acknowledge the capacity and the desirability of a binding Security Council resolution for gender-mainstreaming and female participation in disaster prevention and aid work. Further, this section argues for the recognition of disasters as a "threat to the peace" that can be reduced through the symbolic and legal powers of a Security Council resolution. Part III then establishes why the Security Council itself should seek such a resolution, based on the centrality of disaster relief in ensuring the success of core Security Council goals, such as resolving conflict and fostering sustainable development. Part V shows how gender-mainstreaming in natural disasters would further the goals of the Security Council; indeed, failing to pursue gender-mainstreaming would actually undermine the Security Council's objectives, particularly those relating to 1325. …
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
援助面临自然灾害的妇女并赋予其权力:从安全理事会第1325号决议汲取经验
海啸袭击印度洋沿海社区后,媒体对这场灾难的报道充斥着妇女的照片。但是,尽管对妇女的同情已经获得了大量援助,“在后续政策中,除了镜头之外……还有一种趋势是,妇女几乎被忽视了。”(1)来自该地区各地的妇女团体的报告反映了同样的信息——妇女是受海啸影响最严重的群体之一,而妇女在救援工作中仍然是最边缘化的群体。(2) 虽然海啸工作中相对缺乏针对妇女的主动行动可以说是由于该地区的文化规范和那里灾难的特殊性质,但从更广泛的角度来看,世界各地的灾难表明,在恢复和恢复工作中,妇女的需求和能力被系统性地忽视了。(3) 尽管联合国大会、联合国人口基金、消除对妇女歧视委员会、联合国国际减灾战略办公室、国际劳工组织,(8)和欧洲联盟(欧盟),(9)尚未制定一项具有约束力的全球倡议,明确呼吁将性别观点纳入防灾和重建工作的主流。因此,当各国对灾难做出快速有效反应的时候,在性别敏感方面吸取的教训再次在动荡中消失。然而,尽管性别问题在灾难情况下被搁置一边,但在其他危机情况下却并非如此。2000年,联合国安理会一致通过了第1325(1325)号决议,其中“强调[妇女]平等参与和充分参与维护和促进和平与安全的一切努力的重要性”(10),并“认识到迫切需要将性别观点纳入维和行动的主流。”(11)该决议要求增加妇女在预防、管理和解决冲突的所有决策层的代表性;注意具体保护冲突中妇女的需要,包括难民的需要;增加对妇女和平建设者的支持;拒绝允许侵害妇女罪行,包括基于性别的暴力行为不受惩罚;将性别观点纳入联合国行动、冲突后进程以及报告和安理会特派团。(12) 通过该决议,妇女必须参与重建工作,当地妇女维护和平与安全的举措必须得到联合国和政府官员的支持。(13) 一些援助团体呼吁在海啸后的救灾工作中从性别角度看待1325号决议,但尚未明确表示支持这一联系。本条将第1325(2000)号决议所保护的利益与一项对处于灾害中的妇女具有类似约束力的决议所保护利益联系起来,并主张实现这一国际协议。本条第二部分敦促妇女权利活动家承认安全理事会关于将性别观点纳入主流和妇女参与防灾和援助工作的具有约束力的决议的能力和可取性。此外,本节主张承认灾害是“对和平的威胁”,可以通过安全理事会决议的象征性和法律权力来减少这种威胁。然后,第三部分阐述了为什么安全理事会本身应该寻求这样一项决议,其基础是救灾在确保安全理事会核心目标(如解决冲突和促进可持续发展)取得成功方面的中心地位。第五部分说明将性别观点纳入自然灾害主流将如何推动安全理事会的目标;事实上,不将性别观点纳入主流实际上会破坏安全理事会的目标,特别是与1325有关的目标…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Day 2 Panel 3: Self-Care as Self-Preservation: Understanding Vicarious Trauma & Enhancing Support for Providers Justice For Survivors of Intimate Partner Violence Conference Report Day 2 Panel 2: Promoting Equity From the Bench: Judicial Selection, Oversight, and Training Day 1 Lunchtime Speaker: Stephanie McGraw CEO W.A.R.M - We All Really Matter Day 1 Panel 2: How Bias Manifests in New York State's Family Law System
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1