Artificial intelligence applied to lawyers’ appraisals

Susana Almeida Lopes, Marta Aranha Conceição, João Francisco Santos, Madalena Duarte Ferreira, José Sintra, João Almeida Lopes
{"title":"Artificial intelligence applied to lawyers’ appraisals","authors":"Susana Almeida Lopes, Marta Aranha Conceição, João Francisco Santos, Madalena Duarte Ferreira, José Sintra, João Almeida Lopes","doi":"10.1080/09695958.2023.2215442","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This pilot study presents an innovative artificial intelligence (AI) model to predict lawyers’ appraisal ratings in a law firm. Methodology development was based on an 11-years database comprising multiple descriptors from 229 lawyers. The AI model builds upon law firms’ tournament, simulating lawyers’ career competition to predict performance rankings. Within a one-year lag, the accuracy of the model was approximately 88%. With two- and three-year lag times, the predictions show only a minor drop in performance. Benefits of this in-silico strategy involve decreasing the frequency of appraisals linked with considerable time and resource savings. By highlighting the most relevant performance predictors in the firm, practitioners may identify bias in appraisals and realign talent management with business strategy. This longitudinal study aims to pilot predictive research for AI models in talent management in law firms. Future research may lead to predictive models supporting talent strategies and practices.","PeriodicalId":43893,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of the Legal Profession","volume":"30 1","pages":"179 - 188"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of the Legal Profession","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09695958.2023.2215442","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT This pilot study presents an innovative artificial intelligence (AI) model to predict lawyers’ appraisal ratings in a law firm. Methodology development was based on an 11-years database comprising multiple descriptors from 229 lawyers. The AI model builds upon law firms’ tournament, simulating lawyers’ career competition to predict performance rankings. Within a one-year lag, the accuracy of the model was approximately 88%. With two- and three-year lag times, the predictions show only a minor drop in performance. Benefits of this in-silico strategy involve decreasing the frequency of appraisals linked with considerable time and resource savings. By highlighting the most relevant performance predictors in the firm, practitioners may identify bias in appraisals and realign talent management with business strategy. This longitudinal study aims to pilot predictive research for AI models in talent management in law firms. Future research may lead to predictive models supporting talent strategies and practices.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人工智能在律师鉴定中的应用
摘要本试点研究提出了一种创新的人工智能(AI)模型来预测律师事务所的律师评估评级。方法的开发是基于一个11年的数据库,该数据库包含229名律师的多个描述符。人工智能模型建立在律师事务所锦标赛的基础上,模拟律师的职业竞争来预测绩效排名。在一年的滞后时间内,该模型的准确率约为88%。在滞后两年和三年的情况下,预测显示业绩只会略有下降。这种电子策略的好处包括减少评估频率,同时节省大量时间和资源。通过强调公司中最相关的绩效预测因素,从业者可以识别评估中的偏见,并将人才管理与商业战略重新调整。这项纵向研究旨在为律师事务所人才管理中的人工智能模型进行预测性研究。未来的研究可能会产生支持人才战略和实践的预测模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
期刊最新文献
Silent boundaries: exploring the limits of legal confidentiality in Poland New professional spaces and trajectories: tracing the evolution of legal professionals – introduction to special issue The authority of the elders or the colonisers? Customary law and culture – which legal skills? Assessing law students in a GenAI world to create knowledgeable future lawyers Navigating the legal landscape: large language models and the hesitancy of legal professionals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1