Citizenship by Investment - Latest Development in the European Union

IF 0.4 Q4 POLITICAL SCIENCE Politicke Vedy Pub Date : 2023-01-10 DOI:10.24040/politickevedy.2022.25.4.69-108
Lucia Bocková, R. Kucharčík
{"title":"Citizenship by Investment - Latest Development in the European Union","authors":"Lucia Bocková, R. Kucharčík","doi":"10.24040/politickevedy.2022.25.4.69-108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper covers citizenship by investment (CBI) schemes in the European Union (EU) context which allow to acquire nationality of the EU member state through targeted investments. We were verifying whether the negative attitude of the EU towards the CBI schemes of member states and the ongoing war in Ukraine threaten their very existence. In order to achieve the objective, we analysed the rules on the acquisition of citizenship by naturalization as well as the relationship between nationality of the EU member states, which is still their exclusive competence and the EU citizenship status. Subsequently, we compared CBI schemes of three EU member states (Bulgaria, Cyprus, Malta). The results show that the EU has put pressure on member states to cancel their CBI programs because of the complex relationship between the national citizenship on the one hand and the EU citizenship and related rights enforceable across the whole EU on the other hand. This EU pressure has been further intensified following the war in Ukraine. The reason is that Russian nationals made up a significant number of CBI applicants and also because some Russian or Belarusian nationals who are supporting the war in Ukraine might have acquired EU citizenship under CBI schemes. Of the three countries we analysed, only Malta currently has a valid CBI program. Bulgaria and Cyprus abolished their CBI programs. This development indicates that the EU has gradually succeeded in eliminating the existence of CBI in the EU member states. However, it is not yet clear whether this practice of member states is contrary to the EU law. We assume that the Court of Justice of the EU will resolve this question in the ongoing infringement procedure initiated by the European Commission against Malta.","PeriodicalId":42158,"journal":{"name":"Politicke Vedy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Politicke Vedy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24040/politickevedy.2022.25.4.69-108","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper covers citizenship by investment (CBI) schemes in the European Union (EU) context which allow to acquire nationality of the EU member state through targeted investments. We were verifying whether the negative attitude of the EU towards the CBI schemes of member states and the ongoing war in Ukraine threaten their very existence. In order to achieve the objective, we analysed the rules on the acquisition of citizenship by naturalization as well as the relationship between nationality of the EU member states, which is still their exclusive competence and the EU citizenship status. Subsequently, we compared CBI schemes of three EU member states (Bulgaria, Cyprus, Malta). The results show that the EU has put pressure on member states to cancel their CBI programs because of the complex relationship between the national citizenship on the one hand and the EU citizenship and related rights enforceable across the whole EU on the other hand. This EU pressure has been further intensified following the war in Ukraine. The reason is that Russian nationals made up a significant number of CBI applicants and also because some Russian or Belarusian nationals who are supporting the war in Ukraine might have acquired EU citizenship under CBI schemes. Of the three countries we analysed, only Malta currently has a valid CBI program. Bulgaria and Cyprus abolished their CBI programs. This development indicates that the EU has gradually succeeded in eliminating the existence of CBI in the EU member states. However, it is not yet clear whether this practice of member states is contrary to the EU law. We assume that the Court of Justice of the EU will resolve this question in the ongoing infringement procedure initiated by the European Commission against Malta.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
投资入籍-欧盟的最新发展
本文涵盖了欧盟(EU)背景下的投资公民身份(CBI)计划,该计划允许通过定向投资获得欧盟成员国的国籍。我们正在核实欧盟对成员国CBI计划的消极态度以及正在进行的乌克兰战争是否威胁到它们的存在。为了实现这一目标,我们分析了入籍获得公民身份的规则,以及欧盟成员国的国籍(仍然是其专属权限)与欧盟公民身份之间的关系。随后,我们比较了三个欧盟成员国(保加利亚、塞浦路斯、马耳他)的CBI计划。结果表明,由于国家公民身份与欧盟公民身份以及在整个欧盟范围内可执行的相关权利之间的复杂关系,欧盟向成员国施加了取消其CBI计划的压力。乌克兰战争后,欧盟的这种压力进一步加剧。原因是俄罗斯国民在CBI申请者中占了很大一部分,也因为一些支持乌克兰战争的俄罗斯或白俄罗斯国民可能已经根据CBI计划获得了欧盟公民身份。在我们分析的三个国家中,只有马耳他目前有有效的CBI计划。保加利亚和塞浦路斯废除了CBI项目。这一事态发展表明,欧盟已逐步成功地消除了CBI在欧盟成员国中的存在。然而,目前尚不清楚成员国的这种做法是否违反欧盟法律。我们认为,欧盟法院将在欧盟委员会对马耳他提起的正在进行的侵权诉讼中解决这一问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Politicke Vedy
Politicke Vedy POLITICAL SCIENCE-
自引率
50.00%
发文量
44
期刊最新文献
Humanitarian Interventions after 1945: Multilateralism, Success Rate and the Impact of the Intervention on the Democratization Process of the Impacted States International Conference on Human Rights: “HUMAN FORUM 2022 Spreading the Standards and Values of the European Union beyond the Borders of the European Integration Area Book Review: Difficult Women: A History of Feminism in 11 Fights The Paradoxes of Preferential Voting and the Possibility of Strengthening the Electoral Vote in the Slovak Republic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1