The typology of external splits

IF 1.9 1区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Language Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI:10.1353/lan.2023.0007
G. Corbett
{"title":"The typology of external splits","authors":"G. Corbett","doi":"10.1353/lan.2023.0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:The lexicon divides into parts of speech (or lexical categories), and there are cross-cutting regularities (features). These two dimensions of analysis take us a long way, but several phenomena elude us. For these the term 'split' is used extensively ('case split', 'split agreement', and more), but in confusingly different ways. Yet there is a unifying notion here. I show that a split is an additional partition, whether in the part-of-speech inventory or in the feature system. On this base an elegant typology can be constructed, using minimal machinery. The typology starts from four external relations (government, agreement, selection, and anti-government), and it specifies four types of split within each (sixteen possibilities in all). This typology (i) highlights less familiar splits, from diverse languages, and fits them into the larger picture; (ii) introduces a new relation, anti-government, and documents it; (iii) elucidates the complexities of multiple splits; and (iv) clarifies what exactly is split, which leads to a sharpening of our analyses and applies across different traditions.","PeriodicalId":17956,"journal":{"name":"Language","volume":"99 1","pages":"108 - 153"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2023.0007","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:The lexicon divides into parts of speech (or lexical categories), and there are cross-cutting regularities (features). These two dimensions of analysis take us a long way, but several phenomena elude us. For these the term 'split' is used extensively ('case split', 'split agreement', and more), but in confusingly different ways. Yet there is a unifying notion here. I show that a split is an additional partition, whether in the part-of-speech inventory or in the feature system. On this base an elegant typology can be constructed, using minimal machinery. The typology starts from four external relations (government, agreement, selection, and anti-government), and it specifies four types of split within each (sixteen possibilities in all). This typology (i) highlights less familiar splits, from diverse languages, and fits them into the larger picture; (ii) introduces a new relation, anti-government, and documents it; (iii) elucidates the complexities of multiple splits; and (iv) clarifies what exactly is split, which leads to a sharpening of our analyses and applies across different traditions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
外部分裂的类型
摘要:词典分为词类(或词类),并具有交叉的规律(特征)。这两个维度的分析让我们走了很长一段路,但有几个现象让我们无法理解。对于这些术语,“分裂”被广泛使用(“案例分裂”,“分裂协议”等等),但方式不同,令人困惑。然而,这里有一个统一的概念。我展示了分割是一个额外的分区,无论是在词性目录中还是在特征系统中。在此基础上,可以使用最少的机械构造出优雅的类型学。该类型学从四个外部关系(政府、协议、选择和反政府)开始,并在每个关系中指定了四种分裂类型(总共16种可能性)。这种类型学(i)突出了来自不同语言的不太熟悉的分裂,并将它们纳入更大的图景;(二)引入一种新的反政府关系,并予以记录;(iii)阐明多重分裂的复杂性;(4)澄清了究竟什么是分裂,这导致我们的分析更加尖锐,并适用于不同的传统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Language
Language Multiple-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
48
期刊介绍: Language, the official journal for the Linguistic Society of America, is published quarterly and contains articles, short reports, book reviews and book notices on all aspects of linguistics, focussing on the area of theoretical linguistics. Edited by Greg Carlson, Language serves a readership of over 5,000 and has been the primary literary vehicle for the Society since 1924.
期刊最新文献
Listener beliefs and perceptual learning: Differences between device and human guises Assessing the inferential strength of epistemic must Linguist is as linguist does: A comparative study on the employment and income of graduates from linguistics programs in Canada The interpretation and grammatical representation of animacy English contracted negation revisited: Evidence from varieties of Scots
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1