Soil weed seedbank under different cropping systems of middle Indo-Gangetic Plains

IF 2.3 3区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY Plant, Soil and Environment Pub Date : 2022-11-28 DOI:10.17221/162/2022-pse
Prashant Sharma, M. Singh, K. Verma, S. K. Prasad
{"title":"Soil weed seedbank under different cropping systems of middle Indo-Gangetic Plains","authors":"Prashant Sharma, M. Singh, K. Verma, S. K. Prasad","doi":"10.17221/162/2022-pse","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Trees on agricultural fields can have a positive or negative impact on weed seedbank (WSB) due to diverse environmental and soil characteristics. Therefore, soil samples were drawn in six cropping systems [two agroforest systems (AFS): guava, mango; three horticulture systems (HCS): guava, mango, Indian gooseberry; and annual crop system (ACS)] at two landscape positions (lowland and upland) and two soil depths (0–15 cm and 15–30 cm) using factorial randomised block design each replicated three times. Results showed that guava-AFS had the highest WSB of different categories in general and individual weed species in particular, except for Eragrostis pilosa and Dactyloctenium aegyptium. Simultaneously, guava-AFS also showed the maximum Shannon-Weaver, species richness and Simpson index and was low in Whittaker statistics (βW). The species evenness varied non-significantly with the cropping systems. Similarly, the landscape position had no discernible effect on any weed diversity indices; however lowland landscape position was dominated by Cyperus spp. and E. pilosa, while the upland by Phyllanthus niruri. Furthermore, with the exception of βW, the WSB and diversity indices were found to be higher on the topsoil (0–15 cm). Our study establishes that the AFS system in the semi-arid sub-tropics has a more diverse WSB indicating a healthy system, as opposed to HCS, which has a dominance of certain weed species, opening the door for more severe infestation of invasive weed species.","PeriodicalId":20155,"journal":{"name":"Plant, Soil and Environment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plant, Soil and Environment","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17221/162/2022-pse","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Trees on agricultural fields can have a positive or negative impact on weed seedbank (WSB) due to diverse environmental and soil characteristics. Therefore, soil samples were drawn in six cropping systems [two agroforest systems (AFS): guava, mango; three horticulture systems (HCS): guava, mango, Indian gooseberry; and annual crop system (ACS)] at two landscape positions (lowland and upland) and two soil depths (0–15 cm and 15–30 cm) using factorial randomised block design each replicated three times. Results showed that guava-AFS had the highest WSB of different categories in general and individual weed species in particular, except for Eragrostis pilosa and Dactyloctenium aegyptium. Simultaneously, guava-AFS also showed the maximum Shannon-Weaver, species richness and Simpson index and was low in Whittaker statistics (βW). The species evenness varied non-significantly with the cropping systems. Similarly, the landscape position had no discernible effect on any weed diversity indices; however lowland landscape position was dominated by Cyperus spp. and E. pilosa, while the upland by Phyllanthus niruri. Furthermore, with the exception of βW, the WSB and diversity indices were found to be higher on the topsoil (0–15 cm). Our study establishes that the AFS system in the semi-arid sub-tropics has a more diverse WSB indicating a healthy system, as opposed to HCS, which has a dominance of certain weed species, opening the door for more severe infestation of invasive weed species.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印度-恒河平原中部不同种植制度下的土壤杂草种子库
由于不同的环境和土壤特征,农田树木对杂草种子库的影响可能是积极的,也可能是消极的。因此,在6种种植系统[两种农林复合系统(AFS):番石榴、芒果;三大园艺体系(HCS):番石榴、芒果、印度醋栗;在两个景观位置(低地和高地)和两个土壤深度(0-15厘米和15-30厘米)使用因子随机区组设计,每个重复三次。结果表明,番石榴- afs在不同种类杂草的WSB中总体最高,个别杂草的WSB最高,除油葵(Eragrostis pilosa)和埃及Dactyloctenium aegyptium外。同时,番石榴的Shannon-Weaver、物种丰富度和Simpson指数最高,Whittaker统计值(βW)较低。树种均匀度随种植制度变化不显著。同样,景观位置对杂草多样性指数的影响也不明显;低地景观位置以莎草(Cyperus spp.)和金针叶草(E. pilosa)为主,而高地景观位置以千叶草(Phyllanthus niruri)为主。此外,除βW外,表层土壤(0 ~ 15 cm) WSB和多样性指数均较高。我们的研究表明,在半干旱的亚热带地区,AFS系统具有更多样化的WSB,这表明该系统是一个健康的系统,而HCS则具有某些杂草的优势,这为入侵杂草的更严重侵袭打开了大门。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Plant, Soil and Environment
Plant, Soil and Environment Agronomy, Soil Science-农艺学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
61
审稿时长
2.4 months
期刊介绍: Experimental biology, agronomy, natural resources, and the environment; plant development, growth and productivity, breeding and seed production, growing of crops and their quality, soil care, conservation and productivity; agriculture and environment interactions from the perspective of sustainable development. Articles are published in English.
期刊最新文献
Effects of dose nitrogen on yield and global warming potential in a typical rice-wheat rotation system in China Effect of the combination of nitrapyrin and gamma-aminobutyric acid on soil nitrogen transformation characteristics and rice yield Rhizosphere and non-rhizosphere soil organic carbon and its labile fractions in alpine desertified grassland affected by vegetation restoration Mitigation of arsenic toxicity in rice grain through soil-water-plant continuum The influence of timing and planting proportion on the intraspecific competitiveness ability of drunken horse grass (Achnatherum inebrians (Hance) Keng) by fungal endophyte infection
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1